This is more of a complaint than a new topic.
Absolute garbage!
You wanted to have a moan about bias without having to comform to the constraints of scientific examination. You've stated your position: that it is abusive to dismiss ID off hand. I (and many others) have stated that it is fair to dismiss ID as 'scientific nothing' as long as it has
never been shown to be scientific!!!
Time to step up to the plate and defend ID in the scientific forums.
And I thought I mentioned this earlier at "FAQ: Does intelligent design make predictions? Is it testable?"
No! You did not address the issue at all. You quoted something that
claimed that ID was testable. State the hypothesis. State the predictions! Produce the tests! More importantly: produce this in a scientific forum so the claims can be examined
like any other scientific claim
You continue the mocking attituted with the "LOL, ROTF, LMAO etc."
OK! Here's the deal: Accept that you have to produce evidence of scientific method if you want to have something accepted as scientific and I'll stop taking the mickey. If you want to stop the 'insulting' attitude to ID then show us why we are wrong to dismiss it as pseudo-scientific clap-trap. I'll ask you again - put your money where your mouth is!
What you have presented is NOT evidence!!!
Please present how ID is a proper scientific theory. Which specific theory within ID has
a) Proposed a testable hypothesis
b) Make an untested prediction
c) Tested that prediction
I don't like you think you can simply claim that all of this evidence is invalid with a blanket statement.
It's not a blanket statement, it is the way that science works. Don't agree with that? There are forums within this site to discuss it. Feel free to participate!
™ Version 4.2