Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,468 Year: 3,725/9,624 Month: 596/974 Week: 209/276 Day: 49/34 Hour: 0/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A chance to be a pro-science activist!
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 35 of 57 (194170)
03-24-2005 5:52 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by commike37
03-24-2005 3:28 PM


This is more serious than the other threads so I'm not going to be sarcastic with you here...
I'm a 4.0 junior at my high school who is taking 4 AP exams this year, and I've also attended the 2004 Missouri Scholars Academy, which is offered each summer to the 330 most academically talented sophomores in the state. I have a capability to think for myself, so don't accuse me of being deceived by a propaganda machine.
Congratulations on your abilities. This does show some merit. However you need to keep in mind that brilliance does not make one less susceptible nor impervious to propaganda. Propaganda attacks emotions or other reactionary elements and allows us to skip by logic and evidence.
Brilliant people have been suckered right down through the ages, and I know three people personally who were brilliant and yet somehow got suckered by ID theory.
I am not saying that you were a sucker, or that anyone that believes in it must be a sucker. Personally I do believe that those who are not, have simply not fully explored ID, including its metaphysical expectations regarding how science needs to operate in the future.
There are possibilities for ID to have some utility, and I even opened a thread a long time ago to explore that issue. Guess what? No ID theorists showed up and instead a bunch of us evos batted around some ideas. This did not bode well for ID confidence in their own theory.
I also opened a thread (which CK pointed to) asking for ID theorists to present any new research developed by anyone within ID. It has also remained silent as a tomb.
I realize Ned and Jar have set up a new thread, but if you specifically have info on research (nothing pre 2000) which ID theorists have conducted, I hope you will show up in that thread.
I am open to the possibility that ID can do something, but I have yet to see anything actually done. I am also disturbed by some of its proponents who appear to be demanding modern science be revoked in order that ID's preliminary theories can be called scientific findings. That does tend to lend an impression that ID is not actually a science, or has not gotten anywhere scientifically.
However I am open to discussion and look forward to something interesting from an actual ID theorists (many so far have resorted to creationism).

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by commike37, posted 03-24-2005 3:28 PM commike37 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by joshua221, posted 03-25-2005 10:56 AM Silent H has replied
 Message 43 by Phat, posted 03-26-2005 1:55 AM Silent H has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 40 of 57 (194434)
03-25-2005 12:18 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by joshua221
03-25-2005 10:56 AM


This "machine" seems to be sucking people into evolution, look at the majority of public schools.
I've been to public schools. What machine?
Are you seriously suggesting that a science teacher telling students that the current best scientific model of species diversity is the ToE is some wort of lie? Propaganda?
If the ToE is not the best current model, what is?
On the flip side, what I was talking about, is some very smart people who ended up embracing ID theory as "truth", based on false information which prayed upon their emotions and desires and made them miss some very massive holes in logic and evidence.
I don't like this mentality that is given off of evolution, I don't want to be just another pawn in the animal kingdom for nature's wrath. I know of no real evidence scientifically for ID. That doesn't bother me.
If this is not the perfect example I am talking about, I don't know how it can get much clearer.
Science is not about how things should be, or you want them to be, or even what you think will end up being the underlying metaphysical "truth". Science is about building models of natural phenomena using the most accurate (encompassing) descriptions of how evidence fits together.
If you son't want to be a pawn in the animal kingdom, don't be one. That doesn't mean you have to reject that the best model we have is the ToE.
Personally I'd rather be a pawn in the animal kingdom, than a pawn for a bunch of ignorant rich guys trying to take my money by telling me comfortable lies.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by joshua221, posted 03-25-2005 10:56 AM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by joshua221, posted 03-25-2005 7:29 PM Silent H has replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 44 of 57 (194603)
03-26-2005 4:16 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by joshua221
03-25-2005 7:29 PM


I also realize that people accept it as truth without question. In any situation this really isn't good.
You are correct. Everyone should question their beliefs and models.
A better model would be one that does not give humans ideas of survival, working against, and trying to get on top of one another. Lives of competition.
Ahem... Moses commited genocide, the Jews commited genocide, the Xians commited genocide, the Muslims have to some extent attempted genocidal purges. The current "culture war" is a concept developed by and propagated by fundementalist Xians, because as they put it the Xian worldview is in danger (in competition with others) and Xians must fight to stay on top of other beliefs.
The ToE doesn't say anything about social "darwinism" which is made be people quite ignorant of what the ToE is about. Most of evolution appears to be driven by environmental changes, or entities moving into new environments, not how best to kill and dominate each other. It just so happens that the ranks of better adapted creatures will thrive.
One might note that the rabbit's introduction to Australia swamped it with rabbits. They weren't the killer rabbits from Monty Python's Holy Grail, they just had a wide open niche.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by joshua221, posted 03-25-2005 7:29 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Phat, posted 03-26-2005 4:32 AM Silent H has replied
 Message 50 by joshua221, posted 03-30-2005 11:33 AM Silent H has replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 46 of 57 (194615)
03-26-2005 5:07 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Phat
03-26-2005 4:32 AM


Re: Paradox
I just don't want an atheist state. I fear it. I don't know why.
Because it would be oppressive, and worse than that... boring as hell.
Diversity of opinion and belief is important. We need crackpots and at least a little bit of delusional and outside the box thinking, just as much as the rigid stick to logic and evidence (and assume that is all there is) types.
The key is to make sure there is a government which allows many diverse and conflicting belief systems to live in harmony.
That is why a secular government is the best system developed so far. The Romans and Greeks allowed for many, but still an imposition of their own beliefs on top of others. It can work, but its still messy. The founding fathers were quite brilliant in instituting secular gov't.
Many mistake secularism in gov't for atheism. It is more like agnosticism or simply "I won't touch that with a ten foot pole"-ism.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Phat, posted 03-26-2005 4:32 AM Phat has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 52 of 57 (195470)
03-30-2005 2:30 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by joshua221
03-30-2005 11:33 AM


Humans are corrupt.
Isolating religious groups from this competition really doesn't mean much to me, people will always have this, unless they can somehow can seperate from this world of materialistic competition. That is our need.
Ahem... thank you for proving what I just said. Evolutionary theory does not say humans are in a state of materialistic competition that cannot be overcome, Xians do.
Although I suppose I'd point out there was no materialistic reason the genocides of Moses, and later Xians and Muslims. Neither is there a materialistic competitive reason for the current "culture war" the fundamentalist Xians have begun and continue to propagate. All of that was ideological non materialistic competition.
The genocide commited at Canaan was material and ideologically driven.
I respect it as a science, but when applied to humans it becomes very ugly... Man doesn't have to be a part of this mess.
I honestly don't know what this means. What does it mean to apply the ToE to humans?
Look again at Genesis and the fall and the aftermath of the fall... that's a mess humans need to be a part of?

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by joshua221, posted 03-30-2005 11:33 AM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by joshua221, posted 04-04-2005 8:41 PM Silent H has replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 57 of 57 (197179)
04-06-2005 4:18 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by joshua221
04-04-2005 8:41 PM


Ideologically I see, but material? How?
Uhhhhh... You are responding after a break so maybe you forgot what our little back and forth was about.
If you follow the thread back up you will find that it was my point that ideology was the driving force of Xian and Jewish "bible-based" genocides. You responded by saying they had a material basis like other genocides, mainly competition for resources/power/survival. My reply was suggesting that in addition to any material motives (which you were suggesting) Canaan most certainly was ideologically driven.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by joshua221, posted 04-04-2005 8:41 PM joshua221 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024