Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The fate of Ms. Schiavo
satrekker
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 82 (196156)
04-02-2005 1:52 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by NosyNed
03-29-2005 9:22 PM


Re: Moral right
Yes, the judiciary did a fine job in this particular case. How dare those brain dead, right-wing, religious zealots try and impose their morality on this situation? Claiming to err on the side of life in the face of so much unbiased testimony and overwhelming scientific evidence as to Mrs. Schiavo's condition is absurd! What were they thinking? Why they weren't, and they don't! They believe in God!
Let's look under a few rocks shall we?
Toronto News
Page not found | National Review
Of course all of this was widely reported by the majority press in the interest of discovering the truth. After all, that's what everybody was really after wasn't it - the truth?
Morally and intellectually bankrupt. (
This message has been edited by satrekker, 04-02-2005 02:14 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by NosyNed, posted 03-29-2005 9:22 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by RAZD, posted 04-02-2005 9:28 AM satrekker has replied
 Message 72 by nator, posted 04-03-2005 9:00 AM satrekker has not replied

  
satrekker
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 82 (196224)
04-02-2005 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by RAZD
04-02-2005 9:28 AM


Re: Moral right
sarcasm and argument from incredulity aside, you have presented no evidence that terri was not in fact so brain dead that massive parts had dissolved into spinal fluid.
Argument from ignorance aside...
yes the truth, and the truth is that indeed terri was not only brain dead but brain {{{{gone}}}}.
What exactly is your evidence of this "truth?"
I can just imagine the response to somebody displaying an artifact that purportedly "proved" the assertion that men and dinosaurs lived together several thousand years ago, yet only let his hand picked experts examine, test and give testimony as to the authenticity and significance of the artifact AND excluded other known contrary testimony. There definitely wouldn't be any "doubt" in his assertion (sarcasm intended).
Doubt as to medical condition was only part of the argument presented by those wanting to err on the side of life.
This message has been edited by satrekker, 04-02-2005 01:14 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by RAZD, posted 04-02-2005 9:28 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by crashfrog, posted 04-02-2005 3:55 PM satrekker has not replied
 Message 69 by RAZD, posted 04-02-2005 4:03 PM satrekker has not replied
 Message 70 by Rrhain, posted 04-02-2005 8:27 PM satrekker has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024