Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,873 Year: 4,130/9,624 Month: 1,001/974 Week: 328/286 Day: 49/40 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evidence for the Slowing Down of Light
Mike Holland
Member (Idle past 511 days)
Posts: 179
From: Sydney, NSW,Auistralia
Joined: 08-30-2002


Message 13 of 14 (19713)
10-12-2002 10:02 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Tranquility Base
08-11-2002 9:02 PM


What is your game, TB?
Humphrey's theories have been pulled to bits elsewhere, and quantized redshifts as evidence for Earth being the centre of the universe is the topic of another discussion, where it too has been criticized.
Now here you are, expounding these silly theories again as if none of the perevious discussion had ever occurred!
Looking for a new audience who you can hoodwink? First reply to the (dead) discussion about quantized redshifts.
Mike H.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Tranquility Base, posted 08-11-2002 9:02 PM Tranquility Base has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Mike Holland, posted 10-13-2002 10:25 PM Mike Holland has not replied

  
Mike Holland
Member (Idle past 511 days)
Posts: 179
From: Sydney, NSW,Auistralia
Joined: 08-30-2002


Message 14 of 14 (19809)
10-13-2002 10:25 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Mike Holland
10-12-2002 10:02 AM


Sorry, TB, but my previous reply was too personal and aggressive. I must remember to keep a tone of friendly banter.
But if you want to bring up the subject of Humphreys theory, and quantized redshifts, then you should refer to the existing discussions, so that we don't have to repeat eveything here.
Mike.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Mike Holland, posted 10-12-2002 10:02 AM Mike Holland has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024