The lack of empirical evidence for the theory of evolution, according to Faith.

If you really reject the idea that empirical evidence can support a theory you are rejecting science. So that claim can be laid to rest.As for the IDEAcentre FAQ it leads this section by claiming a significant amount of published work supporting ID: However the fact is that even if these results were presented at an ID conference how many have been published to the wider world ? More than 2 years later, how many can you even name, let alone where the work has been published ? If this research even exists, it has not been published in scientific journals or even - excepting Dembski's failed attempt at the flagellum - in ID sources. So how can it count against a claim that ID has not produced original research published in scientific journals ?

So name just one "terrific" point you have made that has not been rebutted.Or are you just upset that your arguments have been defeated, because uninformed guesses and opinions can't cut it in a forum like this ?