I see that the GD is pretty much over with at this point. In my opinion, while the discussion was interesting, the topic was too general. Debating the entire Grand Canyon as a whole is impossible.
Heck, you couldn't do a Ph.D. on the Grand Canyon!
Maybe in the future, geologic topics should be much much narrower in scope - if possible. Perhaps discussing a single Formation or Group within the Grand Canyon. Or why a certain rock shows evidence for deposition/formation under specific conditions.
YECism gets a hand in geology only when Creationists are able to generalize. When you get down to specifics, YECism loses.
This message has been edited by roxrkool, 04-12-2005 11:57 PM