|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,767 Year: 4,024/9,624 Month: 895/974 Week: 222/286 Day: 29/109 Hour: 2/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: UK general election (May 5th) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ooook! Member (Idle past 5841 days) Posts: 340 From: London, UK Joined: |
Alright, here goes...by popular demand (well two people)
As there were a number of threads up and running around the time the US was electing a President, I thought I'd start one on the UK General Election which is just around the corner. I don't really know how to focus this but I suppose we could start off on a general note, and then spin off into new threads if one or two specific issues get people's goat. I suppose it could also be a place for people to ask questions about how it all works over here - I'm sure they'll be someone around who can help Here are a few questions to start the ball rolling: What do you think the outcome will be? Are there any differences between the two main parties? How does the political process differ from that in the US? Does that make it better or worse? Will the result have any significant effect on US/world politics? Do you think the Liberal Democrats will have much of an impact this time? Who are the Liberal Democrats? Ooops, a fair few questions there! Plenty to hopefully get your teeth into. From a personal point of view I think it'll either end as a small Labour majority, or a hung parliament. The other alternative doesn't bear thinking about!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
contracycle Inactive Member |
I'd be much happier to see an applecart-upsetting Lib Dem win.
I do not know what the outcome is going to be, and think there is a serious risk of the fraud issue dominating the outcome. I don't know if the Lib Dems will make much impact, but they stand to. As the only (parliamentary )party with both the principle and the courage to oppose the war, I'd be happy if they thrashed the warmonger parties to within an inch of their lives. Tariq Ali lives in my constituency, and called for a Lib Dem vote to punish the warmonger candidate, in this case Barbara Roche. Its a Lib/Lab race only. Nonetheless I am more likely to vote for Respect, if I vote at all. There is no difference between Labour and the Conservatives bar style. Both are parties of war and privatisation. The Candidates Find Common Ground Full employment, slave labor, and schemesAn unemployed workforce, the capitalist's dream But lets keep Britain working--either way we must keep Britain working Conventional weapons to kill people nicelyNuclear weapons to keep the peace But weapons definitely--either way we must defend ourselves Nationalization, with one big bossNo, privatization, with lots of little bosses But someone in control, of course, either way there must be someone giving orders (Chorus)A toast to democracy The prison guard of this society Sides in the voting game Disappear into the same machine The same machine A toastTo US bases and nuclear weapons To stopping pickets pulling down fences To the British troops in Northern Ireland To the wonderful victory in the Falklands To the plastic bullet and the riot police To the UDM, to the TUC To isolating gays and to law and to order To richer bosses, to poorer workers (Repeat chorus) To longer hours and to less payTo the courts for those who get in our way To the beating of people who step out of line To the use of troops to break a strike To the expulsion of extremists and political witch hunts To repatriation, to benefit cuts To peaceful settlements, and to no-strike agreements To authority, to power, to GOVERNMENT! One, two, threeTo the annual rise in the MP's wage To vested interests, to privilege To the party who wins the next election By definition a victory to capitalism
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18335 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Contra, this topic started off quite neatly! Ooook brought up a solid topic and you came onstage right on cue with a grand response!
Britain has to worry about its private interests, however. Remember when Maggie Thatcher came to Aspen Colorado and shortly thereafter, the U.S. pledged to protect Kuwait? Kuwait=80% of U.K. oil at that time. So guys, what are the major issues in THIS round of UK elections?Check this out, contra. Are you a liberal democrat in the UK? UK Elect: What If Forecast 2 - What if the Liberal Democrat vote surged This message has been edited by Phatboy, 04-12-2005 04:06 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tusko Member (Idle past 127 days) Posts: 615 From: London, UK Joined: |
I don't have a very strong grasp of political issues. I just have warm squishy feelings, which isn't really much of a way to govern your vote, I know. So what follows is a little blind man's buff around my primary concerns.
Perhaps its because I am from a relatively priviliged background, and so don't see life at the sharp end, but I really don't see what the trouble is with immigration. I don't understand at all why most people in this country want immigration tightened up. Its a total mystery to me. The Tory's "opposing immigration isn't racist" posters make me feel VERY uneasy. Every time I see one of their bloody posters I want to spraypaint "Not even close, Mike!" on the bottom. Maybe its because I earn peanuts, but I'm all for increased taxation, if the results are going to be seen. It the back of my mind, there's always the feeling that a vote for Labour will be on some level an endorsement of the invasion of Iraq. That Lancet report, even if out by 50,000 civilian deaths (and I don't see why it necessarily would be), is utterly jaw-dropping. I won't allow myself to be seen to endorse something not totally disimilar to a decimation, even tacitly. Charley K just had a baby! Aww! I was reading in the Observer on Sunday that so many labour voters are disenchanted that there could be the outside chance of an upset. If Michael Howard becomes prime minister, I'm going to cry. But that isn't going to stop me voting for the Lib Dems most probably. I'd like to see them strengthening their hand this election but who knows? I don't believe that they are really that much of an alternative to the other two. I agree with the Orangutang - its most likely to be a drastically cut Labour majority, isn't it?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18335 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Tusko writes: The problem is that it is us who get the increased tax. The upper 5% needs to foot more of the bill.
Maybe its because I earn peanuts, but I'm all for increased taxation, if the results are going to be seen.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
contracycle Inactive Member |
No, I'm not a LibDem for several reasons, not least of which is that I am a member of a communist party. Secondly, I regard the Liberal movement as a sort of walking dinosaur that has already been superceded by the labour movement. Thats a long story though; the upshot is that the lack of commitment by liberals to actual Labour issues prevents me from supporting them. The only way in which I would consider doing so is in the form of tactical voting, and I am flirting with the idea because I think UK politics could stand to be shaken up by a third party.
The major issues depend on who you talk to - the major parties do not agree on what the central issue is. Labour have their "reform agenda", but this is such a dubious and charged idea that its hard to discuss without covering a lot of ground. Their essential offering is economic competence. The Tories have a fairly reacitonary agenda based on tax cuts and immigration controls. They are accused, rightly IMO, of playing to a racist audience in this regard; their tax proposals are controversial and disputed violently by Labour and the LibDems. The LibDems central issue is of course The War. Their secondary issues are a local income tax to replace council tax and a stop to the Private Finance Initiative by which the government is flogging off our assets. These are all good issues and tempt me to vote for them. Respect is a minor party headed by George Galloway, and which he recently described as "the ghost of Labour past". He is standing directly against the photogenic Oona King (related to ML King as I recall). But Respect is very young and is unlikely to have much impact overall. There are also some Muslim parties standing in opposition to the war and the demonisation of Islam. So, as you can see, which issues you think are major depends already on your predelictions. Labour are inclined to see opposition to PFI as a non-issue in our "post-ideological" age, but I can confidently say from my own knocker-hanging that it gets a lot of discussion on the doorstep. Similarly, there are now many reports that Blair is widely percieved to be damaged goods, and that Labour would probably do better if they ditched him in favour of Brown. Howard is making a much better showing than was expected, to be honest. I fear Blair actually has a genuinely ambitious man on his hands, and one who has nothing to lose. As a Newsnight reporter remarked, Howards whole life has been building up to his chance to run for PM, and you can bet he's going to make the most of it. I now fear there is a real chance the Tories will be returned to power.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tusko Member (Idle past 127 days) Posts: 615 From: London, UK Joined: |
Yes, I think I agree with you there. Redistribution makes me feel all warm and squishy. I can't help it.
I don't know, maybe I would want to hang on to more of my hard earned (?) wealth if I was in the top 5% of earners; however, the likelyhood of me having to make that decision are pretty small, so I'm not going to start losing sleep over it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
contracycle Inactive Member |
quote: The immigration "debate" is a nonsense; the UK population is actually falling. As John Snow covered last night on Channel 4 news, of 133,000 east europeans who entered the country last year, all of 23 are on benefits. But a public pole revelaed an aggregate estimate that 57,000 would be on benefits, in the public mind. The is a PERCEPTION of an immigration problem, but in fact there is no problem. IMO, this is entirely due to the Tories playing the race card, but phrasing it as an "immigration" debate rather than a racial purity debate, which is what it really is. As if to prove the point, the Guardian reports today already spotting on of the Tory posters on which someone had written "Paki's out" - this election issue is definitely pandering to racism.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tusko Member (Idle past 127 days) Posts: 615 From: London, UK Joined: |
I agree - that's what the whole immigration thing looks like to me too (also, isn't Channel 4 news fun?)... but the scary thing is that SO MANY people think its an issue. I don't think that it is just a few diehard racists. To me it looks as though it is also appealing to traditionally more moderate people... and certainly the Tories are banking on the fact that it will run with more cuddly moderate types.
I'm wondering why that is? I hope it isn't the confused expression of some kind of latent islamophobia... which I suppose it could be. But I guess that racism is pretty deeply ingrained in our culture and goes back a little further than early/mid September 2001. Talking of crazy, foaming racists, there hasn't been very much talk about the BNP this election. I wonder where they have got to? Perhaps the media have made a decision en masse not to give coverage. If that is the case, that makes me a little uneasy, personally. Or maybe the Tories have squeezed them by nicking their "caring - even to wogs" clothes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wounded King Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: |
I fear that a Lib Dem victory is beyond hope. So we have to hope for a Labour win with enough of a reduced majority to rein in Tony's ego.
I was going to say I would only vote for Labour in this election if the only other likelihood in my constituency was a Tory victory, but having looked at the results for my constituency at the last election it looks like I won't have that choice to make. I have to choose between the Scottish National Party or the Tories, sheesh. I guess I'll be voting SNP, what a world. TTFN, WK
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ooook! Member (Idle past 5841 days) Posts: 340 From: London, UK Joined: |
Hi Contra,
Somehow I thought I'd see you in this thread .There's one or two things that interest me in the exchange you've been having with Tusko. The first is to voice an agreement on the "immigration" issue, and to underline what I see as the worrying Jingoism in the Tory campaign. It might just be me, but a chill ran down my spine when I heard cuddly Mr Howard talk of speaking for the "ignored majority" the other day. It is the kind of inaccurate, misleading phrase that I normally hear spewing from Mr Griffin's lips, and it made me shout at the telly - Grrr! As an addition to your comments about the white poster campaigns, there was something in the Indy a while back when one of the offending posters was unveiled right opposite a school in a very multicultural area declaring to the world IT'S NOT RACIST TO IMPOSE LIMITS ON IMMIGRATION. By the end of the first day it was up someone had helpfully painted over the "NOT". The other thing that you probably won't agree with me on is that the Labour party should be campaigning on more than a economic stability platform. The changes they have brought about are broadly based on redistribution and an increased role for the public sector and I think they should be proud of that. Compare this to the Tory policy of "small government" and it's consequences and I think you have a real choice. As someone else put it in the Indy "Do you want a country like Texas...or Sweden" Oh dear did I just write that - sorry to all you Texans out there, but I like my national health service Nice brief summary of the issues BTW.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mick Member (Idle past 5012 days) Posts: 913 Joined: |
all i want to see is the queen's head on a stick, but none of the parties are offering that. Is it too much to ask?
added in edit: okay, before anybody jumps on me, I know that the royal family doesn't have that much political power, its just a symbol, etc. etc. But if the monarchy is a symbol, then i want it represent something I believe in (i.e. upper class heads on sticks). If we really have to have a monarchy, then I think we should at least be allowed the occasional guillotining or something as payback. This message has been edited by mick, 04-12-2005 12:25 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
contracycle Inactive Member |
The royals are spreading like boils, it does your head in
We have no choice, we're invoiced for the weddings It's like a soap, a Dallas or a Dynasty We live in hope to put them out their misery Fire the freaky family, we're tired of the cheekAs you holiday your life away our futures look bleak As your castle's burning down you want the people to pay for it Ask us to defend you, we've got nothing to say for it The family, the family, the family horribilusThe family, the family... Kicking at the gates like we think we're on the guest listWe're told to wait - too late, we're getting restless The crowd is swelling as they're smelling the thrill There's dancing in the rubble and there's trouble at the mill There's warning of the storming, news of the resistanceThe peasants are revolting, advancing from the distance There's panic and there's anarchy and breaking the rules They're making fake money and they're taking the jewels What will it be? Funky! (x4) All without a fuss, the coup has been victoriousThe banners wave, proclaiming annus glorious What will it be? Funky! (x4) courtesy Pop Will Eat Itself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mick Member (Idle past 5012 days) Posts: 913 Joined: |
It's very telling that I didn't notice the word "funky" in labour's manifesto...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4153 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
quote: Labour to win with sizable majority.
quote: Not really but the Labour party seems to more together in public and a large percentage of the population will not bring themselves to vote Tories under any circumstances.
quote: Beats the shit out of me.
quote: more of the same.
quote: No - I think they will end up with about the same number of seats as last time.
quote: The party who seem to think that a penny on income tax will solve all problems.Oh and it's the one where the leader is either drunk or drying out depending on the time of year. This message has been edited by General Krull, 14-Apr-2005 05:20 PM
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024