Tranquility Base
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 39 of 53 (16276)
08-30-2002 1:13 AM
|
Reply to: Message 38 by edge
08-30-2002 1:05 AM
|
|
^ I read in a mainstream source that turbidite deposits make up half of the geo-column. Huge sand waves and rapid correlated paleocurrents are the norm in the Paleozoic for example. Lyell was wrong about most of the geo-column.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 38 by edge, posted 08-30-2002 1:05 AM | | edge has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 41 by edge, posted 08-30-2002 1:23 AM | | Tranquility Base has not replied | | | Message 48 by edge, posted 09-21-2002 10:56 AM | | Tranquility Base has not replied |
|
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 51 of 53 (19892)
10-14-2002 9:57 PM
|
Reply to: Message 50 by Randy
10-14-2002 10:58 AM
|
|
^ This gradual morphology up the geo-col is definetly not everywhere as you know! If the flood occurred it must have been a flood of surges and there would have been times/places of constant current )(as suggested by the paleocurrents) that could very easily have sorted shell shapes approximately just as one gets graded pebble sizes (which is suggestive of the flood too). But it was a process and it had cyclical stages.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 50 by Randy, posted 10-14-2002 10:58 AM | | Randy has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 52 by Randy, posted 10-14-2002 11:10 PM | | Tranquility Base has not replied | | | Message 53 by Peter, posted 10-17-2002 8:01 AM | | Tranquility Base has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2