The lack of empirical evidence for the theory of evolution, according to Faith.

Genetic Analysis of Coordinate Flagellar and Type III Regulatory Circuits in Pathogenic Bacteria is the most note-worthy piece of research coming out of the conference, but otherwise, information is scarce, as there doesn't appear to be a website for this conference. Referring to those eight Baylor biologists, though, I would like to see their specific objections to the conference, if possible. Anyone can say that ID is pseudo-science, but I hope that these scientists could provide a good, scientific line of reasoning as to why this conference is merely pseudo-science.

Message 133You seem to have forgotten about the need for some additions to the school curiculum. Since that should be easy enough perhaps you can get a moment to supply them?

hey I didn't challenge the conference's credibility, I just asked where the results were published so I could peruse them. Does it matter whether I'm a scientist or not? In fact I am (though not "highly rated" )Anyway its worth treating ISI impact factors with some caution. You can get a good rating if one hundred people completely debunk your work, because that will amount to one hundred citations...