Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,341 Year: 3,598/9,624 Month: 469/974 Week: 82/276 Day: 10/23 Hour: 4/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Existence of Demons (and Angels)
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 211 of 303 (201045)
04-21-2005 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 202 by nator
04-21-2005 4:21 PM


Re: Faith and Knowledge
Yes faith can be weak and it needs to be protected for that reason. It's very worth it, like something precious that can be lost. And we absolutely DO need to know how the world thinks -- NOT knowing is what exposes young Christians to a loss of faith when they hit college unprepared for the worldly attitudes there. They need to be inoculated with a heavy dose of all of it in a Christian context all through their childhood.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by nator, posted 04-21-2005 4:21 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by nator, posted 04-22-2005 9:36 AM Faith has replied

1.61803
Member (Idle past 1522 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 212 of 303 (201071)
04-22-2005 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 210 by Faith
04-21-2005 9:48 PM


Re: I am rubber and you are glue
Hi Faith,
Faith writes:
It's simply saying I am certain there is no such evidence.
"I am certain there is no such evidence." Hello??
Thats my point again.
Faith writes:
I can't even think of what conditions would apply, and I am absolutley certain that there are none.
"absoultley certain..." Again you make my point.
Faith writes:
This is not at all a statement of REFUSAL to recognize evidence as you say and others try to make it, simply certainty that it does not exist.
Again contradiction within the same utterance.
Nobody can have faith in anything/anyone without plenty of evidence for its/his realiability.
Oh I get it now, you can accept only evidence that supports your premise..Silly me.
Faith writes:
I suppose you meant to say that if I refuse to take this challange my faith is not real?
For once I'd like to see someone of such unshakeable faith back it up with more than: ""I believe because it is just so obvious the truth. I am certain that this is how it is because it could not be any other way.""" Feel good, catch phrase fluff. Avoidance denial and fear. It is very common.
I do not need to believe there is some "blessing" after death to assure me or to comfort me from my mortality. But I understand that some do. And that fine, what ever blows your hair back. Just remember though there are many who do not share your beliefs who are just as convinced that they're beliefs are the truth. So what makes them wrong and you right? What makes your personal faith and belief the end all of the truth. Arrogance and Ignorance. Arrogance in thinking that of all the faiths and beliefs yours is THE right one.
And the ignorance of willfully denying any truth that may possibly put a chink in that self rightous armor you call your faith. If that plane is going down you will be shitting your pants just like everyone else on that plane. Get over yourself.
faith writes:
PS there is nothing what so ever in the Bible that is opposed to science or the laws of nature.
Ummm wrong. Virgin birth: please show scientific evidence of how a human female can concieve and deliver without sperm. Also site how a human female ova can form a blastula and become a embryo in the absence of male genetic information. Also explain how a human can only have 23 chromosomes and live to the age of 30.
Also please explain how Noah could of possibly loaded every existing taxa of organisms in the time frame alloted by the Flood accounts.
In addition please show mathmatically how a human adult male can walk on water without breaking the surface tension of the water. Please show your calculations.
And last,,,Please tell me how 1 + 1 + 1 = 1 and not 3.
*edit mispelled...
Peace be with you.
This message has been edited by 1.61803, 04-21-2005 11:15 PM
This message has been edited by 1.61803, 04-21-2005 11:23 PM

"One is punished most for ones virtues" Fredrick Neitzche

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by Faith, posted 04-21-2005 9:48 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 4:26 AM 1.61803 has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 213 of 303 (201095)
04-22-2005 4:26 AM
Reply to: Message 212 by 1.61803
04-22-2005 12:12 AM


Now the thread has arrived at miracles.
Ummm wrong. Virgin birth: please show scientific evidence of how a human female can concieve and deliver without sperm. Also site how a human female ova can form a blastula and become a embryo in the absence of male genetic information. Also explain how a human can only have 23 chromosomes and live to the age of 30.
Well, obviously, normally one can't. That's the whole point, Jesus' birth by a virgin is not a normal event. It's a miracle, a special event, a child's being formed in the womb directly by God instead of in the usual way, so that his Father is literally God, and obviously He was given all the requisite male genetic information and numbers of chromosomes by Him directly. It has crossed my mind that His genetic information would be fascinating.
Also please explain how Noah could of possibly loaded every existing taxa of organisms in the time frame alloted by the Flood accounts.
Plants were not named. God simply preserved all the seed in other ways. Marine life took its chances in the oceans. God no doubt sent the land animals to Noah. Time frame? It took a hundred years to get the thing built. You think that's too short?
In addition please show mathmatically how a human adult male can walk on water without breaking the surface tension of the water. Please show your calculations.
He's God as well as a human adult male. I'll leave the calculations to you.
This message has been edited by Faith, 04-22-2005 03:27 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by 1.61803, posted 04-22-2005 12:12 AM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by PaulK, posted 04-22-2005 5:54 AM Faith has replied
 Message 218 by 1.61803, posted 04-22-2005 10:31 AM Faith has replied

Arkansas Banana Boy
Inactive Member


Message 214 of 303 (201101)
04-22-2005 5:44 AM
Reply to: Message 206 by Faith
04-21-2005 7:25 PM


archaeology?
A minor aside here, but I thought that you considered historical sciences as invalid, particularly if extrabiblical. It seems contradictory to seek supporting data from such a nonwitness source.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by Faith, posted 04-21-2005 7:25 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 217 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 10:29 AM Arkansas Banana Boy has replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 215 of 303 (201102)
04-22-2005 5:54 AM
Reply to: Message 213 by Faith
04-22-2005 4:26 AM


Re: Now the thread has arrived at miracles.
Well, if you want an event in the Bible that is not described as a miracle and is contrary to science, try this from Genesis 30 (NASB)
37 Then Jacob took fresh rods of poplar and almond and plane trees, and peeled white stripes in them, exposing the white which was in the rods.
38 He set the rods which he had peeled in front of the flocks in the gutters, even in the watering troughs, where the flocks came to drink; and they mated when they came to drink.
39 So the flocks mated by the rods, and the flocks brought forth striped, speckled, and spotted.
40 Jacob separated the lambs, and made the flocks face toward the striped and all the black in the flock of Laban; and he put his own herds apart, and did not put them with Laban's flock.
41 Moreover, whenever the stronger of the flock were mating, Jacob would place the rods in the sight of the flock in the gutters, so that they might mate by the rods;
42 but when the flock was feeble, he did not put them in; so the feebler were Laban's and the stronger Jacob's.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 4:26 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 11:05 AM PaulK has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 216 of 303 (201131)
04-22-2005 9:36 AM
Reply to: Message 211 by Faith
04-21-2005 10:26 PM


Re: Faith and Knowledge
quote:
Yes faith can be weak and it needs to be protected for that reason.
...protected from knowledge and learning, because the "wrong kind" of knowledge and learning (like learning about science, for example) can cause people to lose their faith, right?
quote:
It's very worth it, like something precious that can be lost. And we absolutely DO need to know how the world thinks -- NOT knowing is what exposes young Christians to a loss of faith when they hit college unprepared for the worldly attitudes there.
Right.
Being exposed to many different ideas, including science, is dangerous to your kind of religious faith, isn't it?
Well, my question remains.
Is a faith that depends upon ignorance and being sheltered from learning a wothwhile faith to have? Would your God wish you to remain ignorant of his creation?
quote:
They need to be inoculated with a heavy dose of all of it in a Christian context all through their childhood.
Do you mean they must be "innoculated" against letting in any knowledge or teaching that contradicts their dogma?
Well, that sounds like a faith that is always going to be weak and will always cause it's adherents to avoid learning and knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by Faith, posted 04-21-2005 10:26 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 219 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 11:00 AM nator has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 217 of 303 (201156)
04-22-2005 10:29 AM
Reply to: Message 214 by Arkansas Banana Boy
04-22-2005 5:44 AM


Re: archaeology?
You thought wrong. Witness evidence is simply most of what we have and it's sufficient, but other kinds of evidence help when the Bible is being attacked the way so many here attack it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by Arkansas Banana Boy, posted 04-22-2005 5:44 AM Arkansas Banana Boy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 235 by Arkansas Banana Boy, posted 04-22-2005 1:25 PM Faith has replied

1.61803
Member (Idle past 1522 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 218 of 303 (201157)
04-22-2005 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 213 by Faith
04-22-2005 4:26 AM


Re: Now the thread has arrived at miracles.
Hi Faith,
Miracles are contrary to the natural laws of the Universe.
For as long as phenomenon have occured beyond mans ability to understand it there have been "miracles" or superstition to explain the unknown. Eventually through the process of scientific methodology the unknown is revealed as part of the natural order of how reality plays out. The miracle is life itself. The miracle is how
energy/matter has become sentient. Nature is a miraculous. God or what ever the mechanism that is behind it all is far more than some mythology dating back to the ancient middle east. Humans are intelligent thinking creatures that have evolved to the point of asking what is this mechanism, how can I understand it? If we never did that we would still be throwing rocks at the moon and believing that the Earth is flat. God (if he exist) would be very disapointed indeed. Peace be with you.

"One is punished most for ones virtues" Fredrick Neitzche

This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 4:26 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 11:07 AM 1.61803 has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 219 of 303 (201171)
04-22-2005 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 216 by nator
04-22-2005 9:36 AM


Re: Faith and Knowledge
I've tried many times to show you that you are wrong, but you prefer your own opinion so I'll leave you to it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by nator, posted 04-22-2005 9:36 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by nator, posted 04-23-2005 7:43 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 220 of 303 (201174)
04-22-2005 11:05 AM
Reply to: Message 215 by PaulK
04-22-2005 5:54 AM


Re: Now the thread has arrived at miracles.
Commentaries on that passage say pretty much only that God blessed Jacob for his industriousness, one suggesting that possibly that sort of method was common in Jacob's day, but none treat it as a claim to anything scientific. The passage itself gives no clue, simply says Jacob did this and these were the results.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by PaulK, posted 04-22-2005 5:54 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by PaulK, posted 04-22-2005 11:17 AM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 221 of 303 (201175)
04-22-2005 11:07 AM
Reply to: Message 218 by 1.61803
04-22-2005 10:31 AM


Re: Now the thread has arrived at miracles.
Miracles are contrary to the natural laws of the Universe.
Of course they are. That's the definition of a miracle after all. God made the universe; God established its laws; and only God can break them, but He has done so only on a very few occasions for very specific purposes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by 1.61803, posted 04-22-2005 10:31 AM 1.61803 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 222 by Phat, posted 04-22-2005 11:14 AM Faith has replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18293
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 222 of 303 (201177)
04-22-2005 11:14 AM
Reply to: Message 221 by Faith
04-22-2005 11:07 AM


Re: Now the thread has arrived at miracles.
Miracles are contrary to the known laws of the universe.
God never breaks laws. When God acts, His action is in and of itself a law. The law of God. Laws do not exist without God. Why? Because ideas do not exist without God. Why? Because ideas are expressions of intelligence. Human wisdom is not the source of explaining a universe. Why? Because creation can only be explained by a Creator.
If human wisdom was our source, we would be creators. Creators of ideas, concepts, explanations, and words themselves.
The Bible says that in the beginning was the word. Words are spoken truth or explanations of reality. One thing that we may agree on. We as humans were not in the beginning.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 11:07 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 11:25 AM Phat has not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 223 of 303 (201178)
04-22-2005 11:17 AM
Reply to: Message 220 by Faith
04-22-2005 11:05 AM


Re: Now the thread has arrived at miracles.
And that is the problem. It is all very well to say that nothing in the Bible is opposed to science, but if every claim contrary to our scientific knowledge is assumed to be due to some sort of supernatural intervention, and exempted on that ground, then the claim is empty.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 11:05 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by Faith, posted 04-22-2005 11:29 AM PaulK has replied
 Message 226 by Phat, posted 04-22-2005 11:36 AM PaulK has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 224 of 303 (201180)
04-22-2005 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 222 by Phat
04-22-2005 11:14 AM


Re: Now the thread has arrived at miracles.
God certainly never breaks His MORAL law, but I've never heard that about His physical laws. However, some miracles are more in keeping with natural law than others. The sun standing still and the waters of a sea standing upright for the passage of some millions of people are certainly contrary to natural law. But on the other hand healing is a natural process, so when it occurs dramatically and rapidly by God's answer to prayer, against all normal expectation, it is more like a restoration of nature than a violation of natural laws.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 222 by Phat, posted 04-22-2005 11:14 AM Phat has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 225 of 303 (201182)
04-22-2005 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 223 by PaulK
04-22-2005 11:17 AM


Re: Now the thread has arrived at miracles.
But it makes sense that if something violates natural law it IS due to supernatural intervention. That's a problem only for those who don't believe in the supernatural, not for those who do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by PaulK, posted 04-22-2005 11:17 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 227 by PaulK, posted 04-22-2005 11:38 AM Faith has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024