Challenge to Wordswordman

What I remember is that that the stragelrs were discarded and this does not exclude me from a number of reptile species or amphbians yet now we know even beyond Gould's "bully bronto" that the whole thing about BEING a monkey's uncle was nothing more or less than the brain-washing out a few people in AI or substitute your own opinion in the threaded discussion that fails to even a Lillyput whle loop for the fiction but not non-fiction it is able to narrate. But we would need a soule if only to make a plant with species name FONTANA out of it and yet this being bacteria... the illusion..So if a HOX hoax is this notion for some smooth model of GOULD's idea then the network that would show it's existence I still do not see IN ENGLISH were we can say that THE ENTIRE FRENCH SYSTEM OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY has not been replaced for this on the web...FOR ANY OTHER DISCONTIUNITY that I S not a catastrophe set; which the French also probably have the best science on...I tend to read the reason Wright and Warmer America has not had the NW US steep postion on the total speed of internation science that GOuld could write if not right writ wit etc is that IDEAS generated bioloigcal in US were simply thought of as statements that DID NOT GET a MATH beyond CALCULUS despite the availabilty and intelligence at least to read beyond this kind of story about how biology is not a national thing as phyics internationally is and gave biology the hyperlink to use etc. Biology (as classification (taxonomy, baraminiology, phlogeny)) has not found a teaching insitution able to overcome thebioloigcally based anthropologcal different psychologies to make some economists happy yet after this war let us hope that PUGWASH was that cleaning fluid that keeps all sticks and lips in? Sorry for the last word on the subject.The BODY of an insect IS NOT THE same even in my most rigourus ANALOGICAL thought to that of vertebrate but the sentences in this thread seem to make this virus/bacteria distinction which I do not yet know to be a part of this kingdom etc/.

I am starting to get this-- I neural tube in a vetebrate indeed does give, even potentially, THE Topography of a common geography to vertebrates and invertebrates that could share a common protein expressivity, but unless one KNEW the discontinuity (BEYOND catastastrphe theory (that WOlfram is after) for any topology common to a clade big enough to hold fast to both sister groups, one still would NOT have a handle (even artifactually) on which parameters to relax in the model. THIS is not to say that discoveries in molecular biology CAN NOT (they can) be made to show more similarity in the empricial metrics tangentailly to this time involved but as to the symmetery between space and time;; etc etc we no not enough to say molecularly for the change from use of 3-D Euclidian thinking BACK to any any NON-eucldiean INTO wolfram relatively nodal thought THAT STILL Can be in line with mole bio evidence but aganist some readings of history of bio yet still in the future and hence not fact.

have not the time nor have I actually done the homework but it seems academic to me that Mayr's revolution and any gentics one wants to find universal from his growth is critically dismantled by the 2-D physics of Wolfram's for it has been my position up to now, and now would be a good time to criticze me in it, that Mayr's founder, which Croizat seems to have writ off to a colony WHICH I may have misappropriated from an Illustration of Wright's as geographic distribution as was expressed in 1-d (i think 6 times by Wright) if used to the 2-D form of Wolfram's Naturalism avoids much of the excessive new words Mayr wanted biologists to grow used to. I have never had an excuse (Figenbaum only gave the infinte point not the deviation from a Kant systematic constitution) to recuse my self from the undoubtly great? ornithologist Mayr is and was (I have no way to judge this) but without the 1-d reasoning and being less than a 2.5 display no matter the fractal dimension I think that BSC and much else Mayr did goes to the title Mayr vs Croizat Croizat vs Mayr but to specify this interms of my own redition of c/eICR vs geology
Biology vs technology
Wolfram vs Intelligent DesginWould likely impy I desist from posting scatterd and devote a whole web site. FOr which I would rather try to program univerality search indicators instead for the creation side etc.Reproduction COULD be subject to Maxwell internal FORM that became Internal Field ( in modern Physics) but no dismantling of the standard fare of c/e will approve of a move even an inch in my preferred direction unless it is shown as I think the days will bear that WOlfram is mistaken as to computational irreduciblity but my notion of haptic operation of objects is a bit broader still than needs the focus to be concentrated as reaquired for now.I just collected a fungus that has different varigations depending on whether the dead matter is upside down or not and seems to possibly be modelable with celluar automata etc.

Duplication of previous message, content deleted - Adminnemooseus[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 10-18-2002]