Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Sun's Gravitational Effects on Earth
diggerdowner
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 10 (181674)
01-29-2005 2:09 PM


AdminNosy editing in the "official" opening post.
I was wondering if anyone considers the Sun's Gravitational effects
on Earth Movements, in the prehistoric scheme of things?
DD
By AdminNosy:
I believe DD is calling tectonic plate motions "earth movements" here. I'd like to see the topic restricted to the effects of the sun's gravity.
The issue of biogeography due to tectonics should be reserved for another thread after the effects of the sun's gravity has been exhausted. I do not expect this to be a long thread.
Original opening post:

Why Orbits/Rings?
Does this force move Continents? If we have a 'slippery' crust,
can Continents 'drift' toward the Equator? We still need Tectonics, don't we? How do we date the movements? -if Rock rides along?
Animals get isolated, and 'raft' along too. -even before there were Oceans? Consider the TAPIR. Did ancient Horses and Camels 'ride' over to Asia from the Americas?
DD
(ps-Noah dealt with the KNOWN World.)
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 01-31-2005 13:30 AM
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 01-31-2005 13:31 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminNosy, posted 01-29-2005 3:07 PM diggerdowner has replied
 Message 5 by diggerdowner, posted 01-31-2005 1:52 PM diggerdowner has not replied
 Message 7 by happy_atheist, posted 02-01-2005 8:12 AM diggerdowner has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 10 (181682)
01-29-2005 3:07 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by diggerdowner
01-29-2005 2:09 PM


Somewhat Untidy
I'm afraid that opening post (OP ) is a jumble.
You haven't tied the title to any of it very clearly.
OP's should be focussed on one topic or they rapidly all over the place. There are at least 3 topics mixed up in this. Please pick one.
You need to develop your opening post a little and give some reasons behind what you are presenting/asking.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by diggerdowner, posted 01-29-2005 2:09 PM diggerdowner has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by diggerdowner, posted 01-31-2005 12:50 PM AdminNosy has not replied

  
diggerdowner
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 10 (182069)
01-31-2005 12:50 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminNosy
01-29-2005 3:07 PM


Somewhat...
Thanks,
I do that a lot.
I was wondering if anyone considers the Sun's Gravitational effects
on Earth Movements, in the prehistoric scheme of things?
DD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminNosy, posted 01-29-2005 3:07 PM AdminNosy has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 4 of 10 (182074)
01-31-2005 1:31 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
diggerdowner
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 10 (182080)
01-31-2005 1:52 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by diggerdowner
01-29-2005 2:09 PM


terminology, editing...
Admin,
I've recently read that the Sun effects "Tectonics," Planetary Orbits, etc.
I don't get the forum-forum formalities necessary here.
Thanks for your time.
DD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by diggerdowner, posted 01-29-2005 2:09 PM diggerdowner has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by AdminNosy, posted 01-31-2005 3:07 PM diggerdowner has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 6 of 10 (182087)
01-31-2005 3:07 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by diggerdowner
01-31-2005 1:52 PM


Re: terminology, editing...
Admin,
I've recently read that the Sun effects "Tectonics," Planetary Orbits, etc.
I don't get the forum-forum formalities necessary here.
Thanks for your time.
DD
I don't "get" any of that post. Could you explain in much more detail?
If you "read" something it is a good idea to post a reference to it if it is on the web and a reference to name author etc. if not.
Of course the sun affects planetry orbits -- no sun == no orbit.
I'd expect there might be a tidal effect from the sun on tectonics but would guess (off the top of my head) that it is small.
What is the forum-forum formalities you are mentioning?
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 01-31-2005 15:07 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by diggerdowner, posted 01-31-2005 1:52 PM diggerdowner has not replied

  
happy_atheist
Member (Idle past 4934 days)
Posts: 326
Joined: 08-21-2004


Message 7 of 10 (182243)
02-01-2005 8:12 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by diggerdowner
01-29-2005 2:09 PM


Ok, before I reply I'll just take a stab at what the actual question is. If I'm wrong then my reply will likely be irrelevant and can be ignored.
I think what is being asked is "How much influence does the suns gravitation have on plate tectonics".
My answer is I imagine it has next to no influence. We're trapped in the suns gravitational field, but I doubt we recieve much stress from it because we move through it so slowly. The moon alters things much more than the sun does. It slows our rotation noticeably, it alters the shape of our planet noticeably, and in the same way it very noticeably shapes our tides. If plate tectonics is affected by gravity (and I have no idea if it is or not), then we should probably look to the moon as the culprit. The sun of course will have it's influence, albeit less noticeable. It will just weaken or strengthen the effect of the moon depending on the relative alignments.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by diggerdowner, posted 01-29-2005 2:09 PM diggerdowner has not replied

  
benllinliu
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 10 (201956)
04-24-2005 9:34 PM


As I consider, the topic seems not relate to geology and great flood.

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by AdminJar, posted 04-24-2005 9:37 PM benllinliu has not replied

  
AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 10 (201957)
04-24-2005 9:37 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by benllinliu
04-24-2005 9:34 PM


Welcome
Glad you found your way home. We look forward to learning from you. At the end of this post you'll find links to somethings that might make your stay here more enjoyable.

New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by benllinliu, posted 04-24-2005 9:34 PM benllinliu has not replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4013 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 10 of 10 (202063)
04-25-2005 3:29 AM


CMEs
In Email correspondence with a vulcanologist, he mentioned a hypothesis he was working on involving carnal mass ejections (yes, I`m aware it should be coronal). He thought the CMEs could act as a trigger for major earthquakes. Not the same as plate tectonics, but I thought I`d put it in the pot.No graphs yet correlating the two, but I`ll post it when it arrives.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024