Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Omniscience of Divine Being.
StormWolfx2x
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 95 (206585)
05-09-2005 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Hangdawg13
05-09-2005 1:54 PM


The more I think about it, the more I disagree with this.
Why must a "choice" be possessed by only one being for it to be meaningful? This is what I was explaining with the marriage illustration.
Because the the choice was made (during creation) by god and god alone, it must have been because the you didn't exist when god set everything into motion.
If I were to put you into position for you to make a choice and knowingly put you into that situation while knowing what choice you would make, then you didn't really make that choice, I did.
its the same thing with my book analogy.
what you said is
No, because a book character does not "think".
and im saying that if god created everything and has infinate foresight, then we do not really "think" either. We are just playing out the story the author(god) wrote.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Hangdawg13, posted 05-09-2005 1:54 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Hangdawg13, posted 05-09-2005 11:20 PM StormWolfx2x has replied
 Message 55 by Phat, posted 05-11-2005 3:11 AM StormWolfx2x has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5013 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 47 of 95 (206591)
05-09-2005 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by joshua221
01-11-2005 8:06 PM


Hi prophex,
excellent question, as usual.
I suggest you read Max Weber's "Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism".
Best wishes,
Mick

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by joshua221, posted 01-11-2005 8:06 PM joshua221 has not replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 778 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 48 of 95 (206628)
05-09-2005 11:20 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by StormWolfx2x
05-09-2005 6:48 PM


Because the the choice was made (during creation) by god and god alone, it must have been because the you didn't exist when god set everything into motion.
Even though God chose for me to choose a certain choice before I did, I still have to choose in order that God's choice and mine may become reality. The choice is not the power to change the future; it is power to become part of the future. Therefore my choice cannot be made irrelevant by God's preceding choice because my choice is just as essential to the reality as God's; and not only is it essential, but it is desired by God, which gives it value.
...sigh... I'm starting to see some truth in the 4th truth: No truth. The more we try and put truth into words the farther away from it we get. I started out with a perefectly clear idea in my head and the more I try and define it, the more distorted it gets.
and im saying that if god created everything and has infinate foresight, then we do not really "think" either. We are just playing out the story the author(god) wrote.
But you believe that you think right? You have to in order to respond. And what will be will be, and what won't won't. Future is becoming past and past is history, which is a big story. So you think yet you ARE undeniably a part of a story whether God wrote it or not. Does this make your experience of volition valueless? Who determines value? If you do not believe in God, then YOU do, so it is up to you. If you believe in God then everything has some kind of value including our choices.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by StormWolfx2x, posted 05-09-2005 6:48 PM StormWolfx2x has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by StormWolfx2x, posted 05-10-2005 5:04 AM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5935 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 49 of 95 (206652)
05-10-2005 1:59 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by Hangdawg13
05-09-2005 2:30 PM


Hangdawg13
The action to proceed was of my own freewill, but the action of hitting the kid was not because I didn't know that I would or desire to hit him.
Then you had no freewill in the consequence of that act even though you chose to act or not.And if god had knowledge of the tragedy to occur then how could the road travelled have been a choice?
For god to be able to have knowledge of a future event neans that you cannot have chosen another path because were you to take another choice that would not have led to the tragedy then it becomes apparent that god cannot have had foreknowledge of the tragedy that your first choice would have effected in the first place.
This is a contradictory paradox.If god has the knowledge of the future event you must follow the path to that event or it cannot have occured for god to obtain knowledge of it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Hangdawg13, posted 05-09-2005 2:30 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Hangdawg13, posted 05-10-2005 11:27 PM sidelined has replied

  
StormWolfx2x
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 95 (206673)
05-10-2005 5:04 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Hangdawg13
05-09-2005 11:20 PM


from Merriam-Webster online dictionary
Main Entry: free will
Function: noun
1 : voluntary choice or decision
2 : freedom of humans to make choices that are not determined by prior causes or by divine intervention
Even though God chose for me to choose a certain choice before I did, I still have to choose in order that God's choice and mine may become reality.
If god chose for you than you did not make a choice, you only had the illusion that you did, to say that you had a choice would mean that it would be possible to choose something other than gods will, which would not be possible if god was all powerfull.
The choice is not the power to change the future; it is power to become part of the future
Under an all powerfull god we don't have the power to become part of the future, we have the requirement. Under your explination we have no more power in our choices than do characters in a book.
The more we try and put truth into words the farther away from it we get. I started out with a perefectly clear idea in my head and the more I try and define it, the more distorted it gets.
Don't jump to conclusions, im in the exact same position I was in msg 26, my statement there is truth,
your getting farther away from you original idea of truth because that idea was simply flawed.
But you believe that you think right? You have to in order to respond. And what will be will be, and what won't won't. Future is becoming past and past is history, which is a big story. So you think yet you ARE undeniably a part of a story whether God wrote it or not. Does this make your experience of volition valueless? Who determines value? If you do not believe in God, then YOU do, so it is up to you. If you believe in God then everything has some kind of value including our choices.
1. thinking does not equal choice, in order to respond (if god is all powerfull and all knowing) all that needs to happen is what he wanted to happen, which includes me feeling and doing exactly what he wanted me to do.
also I belive in free will and I don't belive in god, what your saying is that you do belive in an all powerful all knowing god and you are changing the definition of free will in order to make it fit that belief
2.
And what will be will be, and what won't won't. Future is becoming past and past is history, which is a big story. So you think yet you ARE undeniably a part of a story whether God wrote it or not.
and im saying that god cannot know what will be, and have the power to change it without freewill being an illusion. I believe that god has neither power (because he doesn't exist), that is a belief , but saying that god cannot be both all powerful, and all knowing with free will existing as more than an illusion, is a truth.
3.
Does this make your experience of volition valueless?
whether or not I perceive something as valueble is irrelevent. see below for why
Who determines value? If you do not believe in God, then YOU do, so it is up to you. If you believe in God then everything has some kind of value including our choices.
belife is irrelevent. existance is.
If god does not exist, then I determine value based on free will.
If god does exist, then he determines value and I only think I determine value.
refer to msg 26
everything you said falls into option 1.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Hangdawg13, posted 05-09-2005 11:20 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Hangdawg13, posted 05-10-2005 11:56 PM StormWolfx2x has not replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 778 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 51 of 95 (206897)
05-10-2005 11:27 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by sidelined
05-10-2005 1:59 AM


Then you had no freewill in the consequence of that act even though you chose to act or not.
You can't have freewill in a consequence, only an action. At the time you act you may be mistaken about the consequences, but nevertheless you wanted to act and you acted and that is a freewill choice.
And if god had knowledge of the tragedy to occur then how could the road travelled have been a choice?
Because you wanted to act and you acted.
If god has the knowledge of the future event you must follow the path to that event or it cannot have occured for god to obtain knowledge of it.
Right.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by sidelined, posted 05-10-2005 1:59 AM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by sidelined, posted 05-10-2005 11:55 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5935 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 52 of 95 (206900)
05-10-2005 11:55 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Hangdawg13
05-10-2005 11:27 PM


Hangdawg13
Because you wanted to act and you acted.
But you had no choice in either the action or want to act because the path was already assigned.
sidelined writes:
If god has the knowledge of the future event you must follow the path to that event or it cannot have occured for god to obtain knowledge of it.
Hangdawg13 writes:
Right.
Right?!! You are agreeing that you cannot have freewill? OK then what are we argueing about now?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Hangdawg13, posted 05-10-2005 11:27 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Hangdawg13, posted 05-11-2005 12:23 AM sidelined has replied
 Message 56 by Phat, posted 05-11-2005 3:20 AM sidelined has not replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 778 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 53 of 95 (206901)
05-10-2005 11:56 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by StormWolfx2x
05-10-2005 5:04 AM


Thanks for your reply; you don't have to shout. I understand your argument perfectly. I've heard it many times before and I accept it as a possibility. I am only suggesting that there might not be two and only two possibilities for how omniscience and freewill could work.
You have stated that one case or the other MUST be true; and both of these cases have an exceedingly anthropomorphic view of God. I simply don't believe that. What makes sense isn't always true, and what is true doesn't always make sense. Furthermore I wouldn't ever say I know what MUST be true about this since I have no way of comprehending the viewpoint of God.
1. thinking does not equal choice, in order to respond (if god is all powerfull and all knowing) all that needs to happen is what he wanted to happen, which includes me feeling and doing exactly what he wanted me to do.
But how does that annihilate the fact that you also felt and did exactly what you wanted to do?
what your saying is that you do belive in an all powerful all knowing god and you are changing the definition of free will in order to make it fit that belief
And I believe your idea of freewill is flawed to begin with. You can follow one path and one path only: the path that you will choose.
From Dictionary.com:
Freewill: Done of one's own accord; voluntary.
My usage of freewill fits this definition.
What is your definition of freewill?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by StormWolfx2x, posted 05-10-2005 5:04 AM StormWolfx2x has not replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 778 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 54 of 95 (206902)
05-11-2005 12:23 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by sidelined
05-10-2005 11:55 PM


Alright... this isn't getting anywhere.
I understand your argument perfectly; you needn't repeat yourself anymore.
So suppose freewill is just an illusion. Suppose the universe is an illusion, and we are really in a matrix inside a computer as big as the universe. Is there a difference between a perfect illusion and reality?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by sidelined, posted 05-10-2005 11:55 PM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Phat, posted 05-11-2005 3:37 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied
 Message 65 by sidelined, posted 05-11-2005 6:45 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18343
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 55 of 95 (206910)
05-11-2005 3:11 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by StormWolfx2x
05-09-2005 6:48 PM


Stormwolfx2x writes:
and im saying that if god created everything and has infinate foresight, then we do not really "think" either. We are just playing out the story the author(god) wrote.
OK...for the sake of argument, lets say that you and I and everyone else are characters in this book.
From "outside the book" it is evident that we have no freewill. From inside the story, where you and I are right now...anything that we do is something that we are involved in...decisionwise. By trying to look at life from the standpoint of the "author", we are vainly trying to be "as gods, knowing good and evil."
We are NOT the author, however. No other lifeform that we know of is "outside...above and beyond..." this book.
Thus...my character is urging your character to decide wisely which path(s) to take while your character is telling my character that whatever the author wrote is whats gonna happen anyway...thus don't even trip! Right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by StormWolfx2x, posted 05-09-2005 6:48 PM StormWolfx2x has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18343
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 56 of 95 (206911)
05-11-2005 3:20 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by sidelined
05-10-2005 11:55 PM


sidelined writes:
...But you had no choice in either the action or want to act because the path was already assigned.
In essence, your choice is to either agree with the path that you appear to be on, or disagree with that path. If you take another path, that becomes your choice.
You are saying that since the outcome of all paths is foreknown, you never get to decide in the matter, right?
In other words, you...as a character in the overall living drama...want to have a say in not only following the paths...the roles...or the outcomes...you want to actually have a hand in creating these scenarios. It would be as if a character in a play wanted to wing it without a script, right?
In fact....this character not only wants to Ad-Lib in the play...this character wants to co-write the play that he is in!
All I can say is: Am I remembering my lines??
Lets assume that your scenario is plausible.
Dawg13 writes:
So suppose freewill is just an illusion. Suppose the universe is an illusion, and we are really in a matrix inside a computer as big as the universe. Is there a difference between a perfect illusion and reality?
illusion \i-lu-zhen\ n [ME, fr. MF, fr. LL illusio, fr. L, action of mocking, fr. illudere to mock at, fr. ludere to play, mock] 1 : a mistaken idea : misconception 2 : a misleading visual image; also : hallucination
So Dawg is asking you if there is any difference between his "misleading concept" of an author/director of the play that we are in and the assumption that we are dancers and co-authors without a script...winging it as we go along as perfectly as possible!
How would we ever know? Dawg and I are acting within our character by trusting an inner unction that we believe to be God. You are also trusting an inner unction that you believe to be your conscious mind.
From our standpoint, all of us are exercising our freewill to act. It does not matter if God knows the future. It only matters that we know our present!
From your standpoint, the dance is unfolding. Each day is unrehersed.
All of us are living in the present moment.
Is there any difference, sidelined?
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 05-11-2005 01:31 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by sidelined, posted 05-10-2005 11:55 PM sidelined has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18343
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 57 of 95 (206913)
05-11-2005 3:37 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by Hangdawg13
05-11-2005 12:23 AM


Dawg13 writes:
Alright... this isn't getting anywhere.
Sure it is! It is now a new day. The time that you first wrote these words is past. The time that you are reading my quote is here. The time that is to come is being decided as I type.....(for me)
The Past is History.
The Future is a mystery.
All that we have is the Present.
Consider this "present" as a gift...from the One who gave us life.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Hangdawg13, posted 05-11-2005 12:23 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18343
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 58 of 95 (206916)
05-11-2005 3:50 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by joshua221
01-11-2005 8:06 PM


Back On Topic...
Lets look at Prophex's original topic again...shall we?
Prophex writes:
In my global history class a topic about Calvin the famous catholic church reformer after Luther was brought up. He is most known for his teaching of predestination.
In the class, chatter rose about him actually being right. Well I needed to see if what the man preached was in his source, the bible. I found a good two verses that agree with the theory pretty much.
Romans 8:30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.
Ephesians 1:11 - In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will..
Well, so far on my journey, I have thought that God knows what you do before you do it. But a few ideas and doubts are raised.
Is it really "free" will? Because if he knows than it sounds like a game and we are puppets being played out.
This to my understanding cannot be true, because of how we Choose our destiny, how every action that we make effects someone else, effects the world around us, in whatever way.
I have come to accept the idea that God knows the final result, where we end up by what actions we do. But he lets us choose it by what we do. I think I have adopted this philosophy from a movie I recently saw called "Waking Life", dream is destiny where a famous professor talked of this same subject for about 10 minutes.
But when you think about it, the truth about the world we live in is tangled and hard to see through all of the chaos.
So is the world being "played out"?
But because of my belief in a creator certain things come into place, matters of faith, and tradition seem to be trivial. I think the issue of a divine being not only existing but why we are here sort of, the meaning of life maybe is the most important issue.
When I look at the world I see a world straight out of "1984", and "The Lord of Flies", a world of confusion, corruption, and with no meaning.
I agree that it can be confusing and often corrupted. Why does it have no meaning? Have you been talking to yourself again? Remember the superb optimism that our friend "prophecy exclaimed" had? He never got that optimism from himself.
It becomes apparent that there is a Being, and rejecting (Him) blocks the spiritual journey. When I got past that a long time ago, I never questioned Calvin's main idea, never knew it was his. But now I am seeing tiny flaws.
The Protestant Reformation focused on people's mistakes. Luther saw these and reformed the Church. I begin to believe that there are many paths to enlightenment, the one I am taking as a Christian is something that needs great thought I am finding out.
Cool! So don't even trip while you are on the path unless you be trippin over that Rock of Revelation which flesh and blood cannot describe!
Is there anyone who can help me with this issue, try to answer the question of God's Omniscience existing, and Predestination. Are we Robots? What do you think?
Last time I checked, I did not find any screws loose! Looks like flesh and blood to me! How about you?
I am struggling as you can see, if anyone can shed some light on this please go ahead.
Did you say light? Illumination? Understanding? Robots are limited by the light. The only light they have is the one installed within them. Living souls are illuminated by the light that shines in the darkness. Only the darkness cannot comprehend this light...for He shines where shadows no longer exist!
Had any good track meets, lately?
Hanging out with friends?
Were you happy?
Did it all have any meaning?
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 05-11-2005 02:07 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by joshua221, posted 01-11-2005 8:06 PM joshua221 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by coffee_addict, posted 05-11-2005 3:55 AM Phat has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 504 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 59 of 95 (206917)
05-11-2005 3:55 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Phat
05-11-2005 3:50 AM


Re: Back On Topic...
Shouldn't you be in bed right now?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Phat, posted 05-11-2005 3:50 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Phat, posted 05-11-2005 4:03 AM coffee_addict has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18343
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 60 of 95 (206918)
05-11-2005 4:03 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by coffee_addict
05-11-2005 3:55 AM


Re: Back On Topic...
I went to bed early...and I slept so well that I woke up and had to come play on the computer. It is 2:02 a.m. in Denver. What time is it where you are at?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by coffee_addict, posted 05-11-2005 3:55 AM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by coffee_addict, posted 05-11-2005 4:09 AM Phat has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024