|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Why Darwinism is wrong | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Jianyi Zhang Inactive Member |
I have read them, and indeed addressed most of them. The problem is that none of them actually consititute anything remotely resembling positive evidence for your theory.
My interpretation is that you lack ability to understand them. Jianyi Zhang
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
TheNewGuy03 Inactive Member |
What does one do to have a sufficient understanding of evolution? Become an evolutionist...?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Jianyi Zhang Inactive Member |
You have shown neither evidence to substantiate this nor even a sufficient grasp of evolutionary theory to begin to argue it.
I am not interested to convert any Neo-Darwinians to somebody else.If you do not think they are the evidences, I do not mind. As long as it is the truth, it will prevail, just a matter of time. I do not think you at the level to understand it. I just give up. Jianyi Zhang
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Wounded King Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: |
Then why not address my rebuttals to show my lack of understanding instead of simply presenting the same 'evidence' over and over again as if it is self confirming?
TTFN, WK
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Wounded King Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: |
No, they have to show some familiarity with modern evolutionary theory and ideally be able to refer cogently to the contemporary scientific literature.
Jianyi has done neither of these things. He is attacking a strawman formulation of modern evolutionary theory and relying on 'evidences' which give no support at all to his claims, many of which he clearly fails to understand, i.e. the origin of mitochondria. TTFN, WK
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
TheNewGuy03 Inactive Member |
What is the origin of mitochondria?
Αγάπη,Το Παιδί
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2198 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
Please give me some citations for your published work.
Who was your PhD advisor?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Who was your PhD advisor? Dr. Zhiang is an M.D.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: |
How do you know it is the same person?
Also JZ said they have a degree in biology and an MD does not constitute any particular strengths in biology (other than more relative to a degree in physics say). This message has been edited by NosyNed, 05-10-2005 06:51 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Jianyi Zhang Inactive Member |
What does one do to have a sufficient understanding of evolution? Become an evolutionist...?
I have the anwere, become a Neo-Darwinist. Jianyi Zhang
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Wounded King Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: |
Jianyi's website gives a brief resume-
The author, Jianyi Zhang, received his medical degree from Peking Medical College (currently, Peking University Health Science Center), China in 1982, and obtained his doctorate in molecular biology and master’s degree in preventive medicine in USA. Currently, he practices as a private physician in USA. TTFN, WK
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Wounded King Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: |
This has already been covered briefly in post no. 26.
I can give you a more detailed review of the current literature if you like but I think it would be off topic for this thread. If you are interested you might start a thrad specifically on endosymbiosis. TTFN, WK
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2198 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
Why are you not providing any citations to your publications?
I would very much like to read them. Who was your Biology PhD advisor? I am starting to think you maybe made a mistake when you said you have a PhD in Biology.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Wounded King Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: |
He could have a PhD and no publications, it isn't unheard of, especially as he is a practicing physician for whom academic publications are not neccessarily a priority.
I have to say I think this is an unneccessary line of enquiry. I certainly wouldn't want to give out details like that online about myself. Surely whether he has a PhD or not is totally irrelevant to the quality, or lack thereof, of his argument. If his PhD is the only support for his argument then you know exactly how much weight you should lend to it. TTFN, WK
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
EZscience Member (Idle past 5182 days) Posts: 961 From: A wheatfield in Kansas Joined: |
I agree. Publications count for something.
Just being a doctor, MD or otherwise, doesn't mean much. There are a lot of PhD's that aren't worth the paper they are written on.Unfortunately, I have witnessed quite a few of them successfully defended at major land grant universities in my own discipline. An argument should rest on its own merits, not on the qualifications of the debater.Otherwise the debate just becomes a pissing contest. Edited to add title. This message has been edited by EZscience, 05-11-2005 08:44 AM
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024