Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 3/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   SAB
Brian
Member (Idle past 4978 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 3 of 8 (20822)
10-25-2002 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Wordswordsman
10-20-2002 7:17 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Wordswordsman:
quote:
Originally posted by halcyonwaters:
When I first began studying the Bible, one of the resources I used was Skeptic's Annotated Bible / Quran / Book of Mormon -- with his pointing out supposed contradictions and absurdities, I found it enjoyable to go try and research for an answer.
Well... time has passed, and I thought it to be a fun project to create a rebuttal for the whole website. I just thought I'd check if anyone knows if this has been done before?
If anyone has interest in helping out, that would make things go a bit faster I take the Bible at face-value though, and that's how I intend to go about this project.
David

For many years books and websites have come out doing just that. Actually, it is possible to paste any one of those absurdities into a search engine and find sometimes hundreds of good arguments already made, ready to copy/paste. I dount there is one supposed contradiction claim not known and successfully argued as false. But if you would like to pursue, it could be fun, though time consuming.

** Only successfully argued if you bury your head in the sand.
One observation I have made after countless debates with bible inerrantists in chatrooms, forums and e-mail discussions, is that these inerrantists have never studied the bible in a formal setting. I have studied under world famous bible scholars and not a single one would entertain an inerrant bible, it simply wasnt written to be an accurate record of anything, be it science, geography or history. It was written for a specific religous purpose, to tell of God's relationship with his chosen people, the authors, whoever they may be, were not interested in recording accurate history and to think they were shows an ignorance of bible studies.
My advice to people that uphold an inerrant bible is to go to a local college and pass an 'introduction to the bible' course, if available, then try and complete a theology degree at a recognised university.
Once this is done, you will see why a position of inerrancy is ludicrous.
A final observation, the desparate attempts of people to uphold bible inerrancy only weakens the respect non believers have for the bible, you try to make it something that it wasnt meant to be. If you are so sure of your faith focus on matthew ch.25 and follow Jesus' teachings, feed a tramp instead of making a fool of yourselves and your religion in forums such as this one.
------------------
Remembering events that never happened is a dangerous thing!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Wordswordsman, posted 10-20-2002 7:17 PM Wordswordsman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Mister Pamboli, posted 10-26-2002 12:05 AM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4978 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 5 of 8 (20872)
10-26-2002 6:31 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Mister Pamboli
10-26-2002 12:05 AM


Hi MP
I stuided with Murray Macbeath (sadly dead now), John Drane, Keith Whitelam and Alastair Hunter
------------------
Remembering events that never happened is a dangerous thing!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Mister Pamboli, posted 10-26-2002 12:05 AM Mister Pamboli has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Mister Pamboli, posted 10-26-2002 12:21 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4978 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 7 of 8 (20883)
10-26-2002 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Mister Pamboli
10-26-2002 12:21 PM


I was at Stirling and still at Glasgow.
J. Drane was still at Stirling when I was there, he was my honours advisor.
Keith is at Sheffield now. Keith is a real gentleman, he has done me some big favours and I am still in contact quite regularly with him.
Alastair is much the same, nothing is too much trouble for him.
Murray was a gem as well, he was my course advisor in 1994.
Anyway, its nice to meet you and im sure we can share some knowledge in this forum.
Bria
------------------
Remembering events that never happened is a dangerous thing!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Mister Pamboli, posted 10-26-2002 12:21 PM Mister Pamboli has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Mister Pamboli, posted 10-26-2002 3:27 PM Brian has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024