Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,581 Year: 2,838/9,624 Month: 683/1,588 Week: 89/229 Day: 61/28 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why would an intelligent designer design these?
gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 108 (214817)
06-06-2005 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by crashfrog
06-06-2005 5:44 PM


Your theory is just as good as mine.
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. My theory - that is, evolution, which isn't of course "my" theory in any sense that I came up with it - not only explains all the data, but it makes predictions which have been tested and found accurate. It provides a way to make sense of populations and predict how they'll respond to changes in their environment.
I'd just like to add that what I bolded in Crashfrog's post is what a THEORY should do. If it does not do these things then it is not a theory.
This is why creationism and ID are NOT THEORIES.
They don't fit natural explanations to data and they don't make predictions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by crashfrog, posted 06-06-2005 5:44 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024