|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Creaton Waves and Morphogenetic Fields | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quetzal Member (Idle past 5872 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: |
In a recent thread, Peter Borger revealed some of his theory concerning creatons/anti-creatons and morphogenetic fields. From what I can gather, the interaction of creaton particles with this field are what cause the de novo creation of new genes, speciation, subspecies variation, mass extinction, etc. Peter proposes that "waves" of creatons interact with living organisms once every 26 my.
I have opened this thread in the interests of getting further insights from Peter on the exact mechanisms, timing, action, and evidence for creatons, creaton waves, and morphogentic fields. Hopefully Peter will be able to use his theory to expound upon their effect in such areas as biogeography, mass extinction, population dynamics, speciation, etc, using concrete examples from nature. Take it away, Peter B....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brad McFall Member (Idle past 5033 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: |
Does he distinguish an "undulation" from any 'steady motion' that would be more than mere "hand waving" if one was to be able to so, in time, 'extract' the kinematics. Seems this distinction would be necessary before a general DYnamics was supposed. I tend to doubt "morphogenetic fields" myself and prefer the idea of network space now that Wolfram has left the building. When Cornell kicked me out I went to this new facility that was not there when I was at that school and asked for someone who could stand on their legs and tell me what OFFICES had my files. SO that I could give the info to a laywer for a suit but instead once the meeting was arranged an UNDERCOVER cop from downtown escorted be back to CTB. Instead I saw Stephen Wolfram standing there.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6475 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: ************************************ Bump
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6475 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: *****************Bumpity bump
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6475 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: ******************************** Well, this is clearly unanswerable as the proponent of the hypothesis let it slide Bump yet again
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
John Inactive Member |
quote: Ya know.... I couldn't tell you how many times I read about 'creatons' before I realized that he was serious. ------------------http://www.hells-handmaiden.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6475 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by John:
[B] quote: Ya know.... I couldn't tell you how many times I read about 'creatons' before I realized that he was serious.++++++++++++++++ Maybe he meant croutons and he was just hungry
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6475 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: ************************* And it is still unanswered...why am I not surprised?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6475 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: Bumpity bumpity.....and I am the one not answering posts Peter?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brad McFall Member (Idle past 5033 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: |
No this may be an alternative to morph fields however but relies on some notion of Particle Physics that may not be true.Think it is cheaper thang going to Harvard.
Stephen Wolfram on page 824 of ANEWKIND OF Science;2002: attempted to print IN FACT "almost no other" that can only be @ fact if this was wrote to motivate TO fact (getting across (outer totalistic code 204)) and not FROM the same on indexing genome vs genetic material with, "And as one might expect from the intuition in this book, even systems like the one below with remarkably simple rules can still manage to show self- reproduction-despite the fact that they bear almost no other resemblence to ordinary living systems." It seems hard for me to believe that it is only an inability to read and one writing teacher (Will Provine) produces such a senetence as authority but please re-read. When "Wolfram"'self-reproduction' appears in the difference of Mendel's A/a OR a/A in the pollen/sperm or egg ~ no matter the "evolution of dominance (provine Etc.) ~ the EVEN (number of chromosome repetitive DNA...)seperating chromosome art parts of 3:1 truth in the body being transformed physically duing this odd process of the square root (possible? in some day-lily triploid clones) in A x (non-universal group theory)Aa x a at least for A/a=a/A as per Mendel that acquires Hemerocalis taxogeny by activity when not a law of growth, any other orthoselection etc.becasue of triploid gametes with a EVEN NUMBER OF SETS morphogenically may express using Wolfram's "204" code histogenically for instance if, let us say, "the pattern" is some reciprocally figured trait into (or out of?) Mendel's double (hybrid +- parent) signification signed "A" or "a" that is torqued onw way with respect to the fan from which a second spiral is associated with vascular metrics to flower-bud position{s} and by projection a distance of reciprocal trait seperates the A, a between but not among any symbolic computation 'not "among "(would be "spatial evolution else (while?~?)) of A/a (perverted or not) as Mendel asked the reader to adjudicate, then by radial statistics; one:: may with computer support categorize Flower Biometry such that different "patterns" (what Day-Lily enthusiasts look for in a plant (flower) or strictly Mendel's stem length ) could input become once again, against Mayr gaining Croizat etc to the generation experiment wihout the double by using a perversion of Pascal's triangle gearing up for Galton's difference of organic and molecular units in Cantor Domain etc that may not be the Chinese equivalent even if within Gladyshev's notion of Macrothermodynamics etc etc/ etc...eTc. Other possibilites do exist, I guess. It seems prelimiarily that this is possible for squamates,day-lilys and echinoderms so why I was prevented data acess at Cornell remains a mystery.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6475 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
BM:
Other possibilites do exist, I guess. It seems prelimiarily that this is possible for squamates,day-lilys and echinoderms so why I was prevented data acess at Cornell remains a mystery. M: You were prevented from accessing data at Cornell? Did they give a reason why? Unless it was unpublished raw data, most researchers are required to provide data and materials upon request. cheers,M
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr_Tazimus_maximus Member (Idle past 3217 days) Posts: 402 From: Gaithersburg, MD, USA Joined: |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mammuthus:
quote: Actually I thought that he meant "cretins" at first and that he was being facetious. I have been trying to keep up with the pile of dren from Peter, Ahmad and others recently generated on this board but I currently lack the time due to problems within my company. If they are resolved and the company survives I will try to focus more on the flaws within the biochemistry of Peter and others statements. Till then , good luck and happy hunting. ------------------"Chance favors the prepared mind." L. Pasteur Taz
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6475 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dr_Tazimus_maximus:
[B][QUOTE]Originally posted by Mammuthus: quote: Actually I thought that he meant "cretins" at first and that he was being facetious. I have been trying to keep up with the pile of dren from Peter, Ahmad and others recently generated on this board but I currently lack the time due to problems within my company. If they are resolved and the company survives I will try to focus more on the flaws within the biochemistry of Peter and others statements. Till then , good luck and happy hunting. [/B][/QUOTE] ***************** Good luck with the company Taz...I hope you can join us here again soon. Best wishes,M
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quetzal Member (Idle past 5872 days) Posts: 3228 Joined: |
Best of luck Taz. However, unless you can come back soon, I'm really afraid there won't be much left to chew on. Ya know, mammoths ate lots and lots...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6475 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
quote: ********************** They also produced loads of feces ...but all the mammoths combined could not have produced as big a heap of crap as the morphogenetic/creaton particle/multipurpose genome hypothesis
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024