This is getting *very* crazy then.
If a label can not be used to indicate a secular intent of the difference between the biblical theologian and the philosophical theologian the so-called "lemon" test IS a lime, and in full color too. It seems to me that if Croizat was Creationism and his "authority" issued such warnings about "darwin" etc then it could not be claimed to convey a "religious message". The modern synthesis and the FAILURE to advance population thinking at a meme's expense by purging post WWII eugenic attachments THROUGH the use of the distinction of phenotype and genotype WITHOUT a role for man's destruction of the same environment (by former war or current environmental degradation) into the relation of selection and niche construction (or the effect of say asteriods ruling both man's destruction and nature's change) prevents the secularity ITSELF from arising out of warnings well spelled in.