No Problem to Solve Big Bang

I hope that you will find this interestingI have made a very simple discovery that everybody has seen but nobody noticed. From that discovery I have derived The Unified Theory of Physics that solves most of the questions and paradoxes and anomalies in the modern physics. My unifying theory implies indirect but objective critics of the modern physics.
Now I am preparing papers for ESOF conference.I August I hope that I can update my web-site with more and new interesting explanations about Poud-Rebka's misinterpretation of their measurings. I have found a spectral analyze reference that proves my calculations and my derivations.
I will then also show explanations of the mistake to compare Lyman-redshift and Balmer-redshift as the same z-value. It is the redshift fraction's value that counts.I will then give a more complete explanation to the Pioneers' anomalous acceleration. It is a funny and simple solution.
I have participated and lectured at five international conferences, and at the NPA's conference 2000, where Tom van Flandern told me that I would hurt the science and the colleagues if I succeeded to publish my theory. It was a fine compliment, but his understatement was right, no science journal dares to let me publish it.Ingvar, Sweden
The Unified Theory of Physics

This is not even close to acceptable in its present form.We are not interested in hearing about who has endorsed you, or about what conferences you attend, or plans for your web site. Sweeping claims that you have solved physics or that well known and well understood experiments like that of Pound and Rebka have been misinterpreted all these years until now, need a lot more than bland assertion.I am going to reject this proposal outright in its present form.In accord with the requirements of this forum, you should pick one topic, and deal with it substantively.For example, you could propose an explanation for the anomalous acceleration of Pioneer 10; or you could propose a new interpretation of the gravitational redshift observed by Pound and Rebka.Your post should present a self-contained substantive contribution on a clearly defined and limited topic. A post may include links and references for more information; but it would be possible to read and understand the main structure of the argument from the post alone.The best way to get a credible new topic is to start over from scratch. Remember; focus on a topic, and forget about the conferences, the endorsements, and the plans for the future. Paranoia about science and insulting pejoratives will mean you are likely to be subject to harsh scrutiny. You will be much better to avoid insults at the mainstream and just present your idea. If you go the road of personal attack over substance, you'll find you won't be able to publish here either.Focus on your own ideas, and present something substantive, even if highly non-standard, then write it as a post and try again.Make the topic title meaningful, and a reference to your idea. Nothing in your post was about the Big Bang. If you want to talk about the Pound and Rebka experiment; make that your title. If it is Pioneer 10 anomalous acceleration, put that in the title.Cheers -- SylasThis message has been edited by AdminSylas, 06-25-2005 11:50 PM

Hi Ingvar,I temporarily reopened this topic so I could add a couple of my own brief comments.You posted a very similar message at Message 22 about a month ago and there was no response. I'd like to echo Sylas's suggestions. If you decide to attempt another thread proposal, focus on a single topic, and introduce it clearly and succinctly. Don't make grandious claims, and don't engage in extraneous diversions about conferences and lectures.But my biggest concern is that in poking about on the web I find that you don't actually participate in discussions. You almost always post just a single message similar to the one here with a link to your website. This is strong evidence that you're interested in promotion, not discussion.For this reason I will not permit the approval of any thread proposal from you until you've demonstrated the ability to contribute productively to other ongoing discussions here at EvC Forum.

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Director