Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,390 Year: 3,647/9,624 Month: 518/974 Week: 131/276 Day: 5/23 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Darwin right again
Itzpapalotl
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 2 (22339)
11-12-2002 8:15 AM


One of Darwins many interests was carnivorous plants and in his writings on the subject he proposed that the waterwheel plant Aldrovanda vesiculosa: Aldrovanda vesiculosa project (pics.) was the closes relative of the venus flytrap. Now genetic studies have revealed that the waterwheel is the closest living relative of the flytrap.
"Evolutionary studies have shown that carnivory arose independently within several lineages of flowering plants. However, it has been unclear whether snap-traps evolved twice or only once, because the aquatic waterwheel plant (Aldrovanda vesiculosa) has been poorly studied. Using DNA sequences from four genes, Cameron et al. show that Aldrovanda is sister to Venus’ flytrap (Dionaea muscipula), and that this pair is sister to the sundews (Drosera). These results indicate that snap-traps are derived from adhesive flypaper-traps and share a common ancestry, despite the fact that this fast action mechanism is used by both a terrestrial and an aquatic species."
Kenneth M. Cameron, Kenneth J. Wurdack, and Richard W. Jobson. Molecular evidence for the common origin of snap-traps among carnivorous plants. American Journal of Botany (in press)
There is a press release on the research here: Page not found » New York Botanical Garden
This shows yet again what a great scientist Charles Darwin was.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Brad McFall, posted 11-12-2002 12:28 PM Itzpapalotl has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5053 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 2 of 2 (22358)
11-12-2002 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Itzpapalotl
11-12-2002 8:15 AM


It is nice to seem some interest in the way these kinds "dot" the ground. If only one was able to pick up on them as Croizat put them into print in "Principia Botanica". My guess is that "the capusle" will not show support for Darwin but this preference is based more on motivation than attidue. I do not know plants as well as animals and I have very little "feel" for any other kingdom.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Itzpapalotl, posted 11-12-2002 8:15 AM Itzpapalotl has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024