Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Budget Deficit Forecast cut by 100 Billion
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 16 of 43 (223682)
07-13-2005 9:24 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Tal
07-13-2005 1:18 PM


How about that, Bush's tax cuts are working.
I don't see that. I see an article that says that the budget overrun is going to be less than originally projected.
I never heard of a CEO or a company that would hire someone or build a factory simply because they had a little extra cash. Companies hire people and create jobs when its profitable to do so. Does Bush's tax cuts suddenly make it profitable to do that? I don't understand how it would but I invite any of you to explain it to me.
No Bush-bashing, no partisanship, just a discussion of economics. Try, when you respond to me, to keep in mind that I voted for Bush.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Tal, posted 07-13-2005 1:18 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Tal, posted 07-14-2005 2:35 PM crashfrog has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 43 (223684)
07-13-2005 9:42 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Monk
07-13-2005 9:14 PM


Hi, Monk.
I guess I read a little more into the OP than just the $100 billion was good news.
Anyway, I may have joked around with you some before, but I've never meant anything as a personal insult. As long as everything is cool.
I suppose I should have written something a bit more substantial in my reply to the OP.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Monk, posted 07-13-2005 9:14 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 07-13-2005 10:01 PM Chiroptera has not replied
 Message 19 by Monk, posted 07-13-2005 10:11 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 414 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 18 of 43 (223685)
07-13-2005 10:01 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Chiroptera
07-13-2005 9:42 PM


Yeah.
It's a classic Good News/Bad News joke.
The Good News is that the Bad News is only 3/4 right.
This message has been edited by jar, 07-13-2005 10:23 PM

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Chiroptera, posted 07-13-2005 9:42 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Dead Parrot, posted 07-13-2005 11:21 PM jar has not replied
 Message 24 by Tal, posted 07-14-2005 2:42 PM jar has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3944 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 19 of 43 (223686)
07-13-2005 10:11 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Chiroptera
07-13-2005 9:42 PM


I guess I read a little more into the OP than just the $100 billion was good news.
True, there's more there. My point without getting into specifics, is that good news is good news regardless of the cause. Sometimes that gets overlooked in the grind to condemn Bush.
Anyway, I may have joked around with you some before, but I've never meant anything as a personal insult. As long as everything is cool.
Cool

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Chiroptera, posted 07-13-2005 9:42 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Dead Parrot
Member (Idle past 3365 days)
Posts: 151
From: Wellington, NZ
Joined: 04-13-2005


Message 20 of 43 (223689)
07-13-2005 11:21 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by jar
07-13-2005 10:01 PM


Good news...
Yeah, I'd like to hear the reasoning as to how being $1,000 more in debt for every man, woman and child counts as "good news": I want to try it out on my bank next time I go $100 overdrawn.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 07-13-2005 10:01 PM jar has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5839 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 21 of 43 (223698)
07-14-2005 4:40 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Monk
07-13-2005 4:31 PM


That's somewhat close to a concession and is good as it ever gets in support of conservative viewpoints on this forum.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but up till Bush got in the White House a "conservative viewpoint" was that deficits were bad, and less of a deficit is still a deficit?
Call me when the 400 billion projected deficit gets closer to 1 billion, or let's say -1 million. Then we can talk about what "conservative" is.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Monk, posted 07-13-2005 4:31 PM Monk has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5839 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 22 of 43 (223699)
07-14-2005 4:52 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Monk
07-13-2005 9:14 PM


Your concession, which you qualified, is that the $100 Billion is good news. That's all. Stop there. It's good news.
So when a plane crash involving your entire family is projected to yield no survivors, and it turns out one member has managed to pull through as a quadraplegic near vegetable, you think: "good news"?
No offense at all at the sarcasm, Holmes keeps me busy with that.
In this recent post on the Rove-Wilson affair I refrained from almost complete sarcasm (I think complete but I'm not sure).
This second post has a little bit of sarcasm, but certainly not too much.
I am giving a little plug for my total and complete public depantsing of Monk. I didn't even have to use witty rejoinders, just documented proof of his errancy using a source he pretended to be knowledgable of, in order to smear an innocent man. The first post is more serious and necessary to read than the second, if you must choose between the two.
This message has been edited by holmes, 07-14-2005 04:56 AM

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Monk, posted 07-13-2005 9:14 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Monk, posted 07-14-2005 3:18 PM Silent H has replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5697 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 23 of 43 (223769)
07-14-2005 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by crashfrog
07-13-2005 9:24 PM


Does Bush's tax cuts suddenly make it profitable to do that? I don't understand how it would but I invite any of you to explain it to me.
The historical record couldn't be clearer. The Kennedy tax-rate reductions that triggered the prosperity of the 1960s and produced a windfall of government revenues indeed ended up helping balance the budget in 1964-65. Federal revenues doubled in the 1980s as a result of the Reagan tax-rate cuts. Today the evidence continues to mount that the Bush tax-rate reductions of 2003 also got the economy moving again and are leading to increased federal revenues.
The most compelling evidence comes from the latest Congressional Budget Office monthly report, which shows the totals for the first eight months of fiscal 2005 and tells us most of the story for the whole year. The most notable figure in the CBO report is that corporate income tax receipts are up a stunning 47.5 percent this year. Individual income taxes are also up sharply this year, leaping 20.5 percent over last year.
Bush's tax rate reductions, like JFK's supply-side tax cuts, have successfully reduced the deficit, despite Congress's continuing lack of spending discipline. While outlays have jumped by $110 billion so far this year, revenues have far outpaced them, rising by $183 billion and thus closing the budget deficit by $73 billion.
link
In short, tax cuts spur economic growth and all ships rise with the tide which puts more revenue in the Govt's treasury.
This message has been edited by Tal, 07-14-2005 02:39 PM

I helped scare an old person-I stopped someone from keeping more of their money-So what if people want to have say in the places they live and the cars that they drive-I gave money to an environmental group that helped keep us dependant on foreign oil-I help the enemies of democracy get stronger by telling them laws don’t matter-What if one day I need an abortion-Sex with an intern, everybody does it-I help teach kids around America that America is always wrong
Do you know what your DNC stands for?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by crashfrog, posted 07-13-2005 9:24 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by crashfrog, posted 07-14-2005 6:13 PM Tal has not replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5697 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 24 of 43 (223772)
07-14-2005 2:42 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by jar
07-13-2005 10:01 PM


Or the Good News is that the problem is 1/4 solved. I think that's huge considering 911.

I helped scare an old person-I stopped someone from keeping more of their money-So what if people want to have say in the places they live and the cars that they drive-I gave money to an environmental group that helped keep us dependant on foreign oil-I help the enemies of democracy get stronger by telling them laws don’t matter-What if one day I need an abortion-Sex with an intern, everybody does it-I help teach kids around America that America is always wrong
Do you know what your DNC stands for?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 07-13-2005 10:01 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Jazzns, posted 07-14-2005 3:04 PM Tal has not replied
 Message 29 by Chiroptera, posted 07-14-2005 4:59 PM Tal has not replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3931 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 25 of 43 (223784)
07-14-2005 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Tal
07-14-2005 2:42 PM


The problem created by whom? Which administration caused it to begin with? What party currently controls spending in our nation?

Organizations worth supporting:
Electronic Frontier Foundation | Defending your rights in the digital world (Protect Privacy and Security)
Home | American Civil Liberties Union (Protect Civil Rights)
AAUP (Protect Higher Learning)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Tal, posted 07-14-2005 2:42 PM Tal has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3944 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 26 of 43 (223785)
07-14-2005 3:18 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Silent H
07-14-2005 4:52 AM


Holmes at it again
Holmes writes:
So when a plane crash involving your entire family is projected to yield no survivors, and it turns out one member has managed to pull through as a quadraplegic near vegetable, you think: "good news"?
No, that's not good news, it's bad news. There is no shortage of bad news. For the "cup is half empty" crowd, there is no such thing as good news. (Except a Hilary win in '08)
Holmes writes:
I am giving a little plug for my total and complete public depantsing of Monk. I didn't even have to use witty rejoinders, just documented proof of his errancy using a source he pretended to be knowledgable of, in order to smear an innocent man. The first post is more serious and necessary to read than the second, if you must choose between the two.
At it again eh Holmes? You just can't resist tooting your own horn. You just can't help but advertise yourself. Why don't you let readers decide for themselves?
Giving yourself a little plug? Ha, that's an understatement. You can't help it, it feeds your insecurity. Sad
But your tactics have been exposed here
You were also treated to your very own special can of Whoopass here
Followed by, The Public Flagellation of Holmes here

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Silent H, posted 07-14-2005 4:52 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by CK, posted 07-14-2005 3:24 PM Monk has replied
 Message 30 by Silent H, posted 07-14-2005 5:19 PM Monk has replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4148 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 27 of 43 (223786)
07-14-2005 3:24 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Monk
07-14-2005 3:18 PM


Re: Holmes at it again
come on! you were hammered out of the park. why don't you actually read the report and try and mount some form of comeback?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Monk, posted 07-14-2005 3:18 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Monk, posted 07-14-2005 3:54 PM CK has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3944 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 28 of 43 (223794)
07-14-2005 3:54 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by CK
07-14-2005 3:24 PM


Re: Holmes at it again
come on! you were hammered out of the park. why don't you actually read the report and try and mount some form of comeback?
To Holmes followers, anything he does seems glorious. Why don't you post something of substance instead of a two sentence reply in support of your fearless leader.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by CK, posted 07-14-2005 3:24 PM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Dead Parrot, posted 07-14-2005 5:58 PM Monk has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 43 (223799)
07-14-2005 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Tal
07-14-2005 2:42 PM


Actually, a lot less than 1/4. Besides the deficit we still need an educational system that educates, we need housing for those in substandard housing (or even homeless), we need medical care available to those without insurance, we need a decent income for those unemployed and underemployed. A balanced budget doesn't even begin to address the disparity in wealth and living standards that exist in this country.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Tal, posted 07-14-2005 2:42 PM Tal has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5839 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 30 of 43 (223801)
07-14-2005 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Monk
07-14-2005 3:18 PM


Re: Holmes at it again
Except a Hilary win in '08
Why do you keep mentioning this when talking to me? I admit I liked her a while back, but once she fully entered the political arena, and certainly moe recently I have not liked her much at all. I am actually not wanting to see her run in 2008 (I am sick of families dominating govt positions anyway), and the reps could field someone I'd like more than her.
By the way, there has been good news. I was happy that we knocked the Taliban out of power, and still hope something can be made out of the mess that is Iraq.
But I'm not about to view lesser bad news as tantamount to good news.
Giving yourself a little plug? Ha, that's an understatement. You can't help it, it feeds your insecurity. Sad
Okay, it's a big plug. This actually doesn't have to do with my insecurity though. I am sort of proud of what I did, and I would like to make sure people know it is there and so increase the likelihood of people seeing it. Sometimes I get noticed for stuff I wasn't really excited by myself, while things I liked get no notice.
And this also was an attempt to cover my bases to make sure you would see it and respond. Honestly there is simply no way around the mistake you made, and I am hoping to see you finally admit an error, and more importantly than that address what the truth of the situation means regarding Rove and Bush.
Go ahead and plug your counter posts. I really don't mind at all. More importantly though, plug your original post as well as my response (#77) and let people decide who came off better.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Monk, posted 07-14-2005 3:18 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Monk, posted 07-14-2005 5:33 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024