Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Some Historical Facts:
Tal
Member (Idle past 5706 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 196 of 209 (224393)
07-18-2005 10:35 AM
Reply to: Message 195 by crashfrog
07-17-2005 3:59 PM


The UN did not adopt it, thus, our military action is indisputably illegal.
Illegal under what law? What UN law prevents one country from conducting military operations in another country?

I helped scare an old person-I stopped someone from keeping more of their money-So what if people want to have say in the places they live and the cars that they drive-I gave money to an environmental group that helped keep us dependant on foreign oil-I help the enemies of democracy get stronger by telling them laws don’t matter-What if one day I need an abortion-Sex with an intern, everybody does it-I help teach kids around America that America is always wrong
Do you know what your DNC stands for?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by crashfrog, posted 07-17-2005 3:59 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 203 by crashfrog, posted 07-18-2005 7:49 PM Tal has replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 197 of 209 (224451)
07-18-2005 4:49 PM
Reply to: Message 194 by jar
07-15-2005 6:13 PM


Re: Ah, more information on training Terrorists.
It looks like the prime suspect for the London bomb maker got his basic training at NC State with advanced level training at Leeds. More clear evidence that the US and England are centers for terrorist training.
You equate chemical engineering with terrorists training? Maybe we should try your terrorist diplomacy on the NC State adminstrators.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by jar, posted 07-15-2005 6:13 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by jar, posted 07-18-2005 5:19 PM Monk has replied
 Message 199 by Meeb, posted 07-18-2005 5:19 PM Monk has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 198 of 209 (224454)
07-18-2005 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 197 by Monk
07-18-2005 4:49 PM


Re: Ah, more information on training Terrorists.
You equate chemical engineering with terrorists training?
Well, if you'd like to start a thread on that I'll be glad to respond but that is not what I said.
Maybe we should try your terrorist diplomacy on the NC State adminstrators.
Well, if you'd like to start a thread on that I'll be glad to respond but that is not what I said.
I'll be glad to discuss just how stupid the present anti-terrorism effort is and has been. But for know, how about either you or Tal trying to address the absolute errors and misstatments in the OP? Once we clear those up we can move on to other errors.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by Monk, posted 07-18-2005 4:49 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 200 by Monk, posted 07-18-2005 6:02 PM jar has replied

  
Meeb
Inactive Member


Message 199 of 209 (224455)
07-18-2005 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 197 by Monk
07-18-2005 4:49 PM


Re: Ah, more information on training Terrorists.
You equate chemical engineering with terrorists training?
I can create poisonbombs out of magnesium, copper, paint and gunpowder from small firecrackers. Learned it by accident in the 8th grade.
The diffrence lies in the question of how are you going to use this knowledge?
Me, I'll just settle with lighting a magnesium tape from time to time to amaze people.
This message has been edited by Meeb, Tue, 19-Jul-2005 12:22 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by Monk, posted 07-18-2005 4:49 PM Monk has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 200 of 209 (224465)
07-18-2005 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 198 by jar
07-18-2005 5:19 PM


Re: Ah, more information on training Terrorists.
Well, if you'd like to start a thread on that I'll be glad to respond but that is not what I said.
You must like this phrase since you repeated it twice in the last post. Of course, I never said anything of the sort. I was responding to your posts and I wasn't quoting you. I was commenting on the content. You seem to be the one who wants to start a new thread, having said it twice, not me. So stop talking about it and go do it.
I'll be glad to discuss just how stupid the present anti-terrorism effort is and has been. But for know, how about either you or Tal trying to address the absolute errors and misstatments in the OP? Once we clear those up we can move on to other errors.
Yes, you've made it clear in other threads that you consider all sorts of issues to be stupid. Now don't rush the response and ask me where you said an issue was stupid and if I'd like to start a thread about it. Let's just say your opposition to a wide variety of topics is obvious from your posting history.
As far as the Op, hasn't it been discussed at length in this thread? We are nearing 200 posts. If you still feel there are errors that need to be cleared up in addition to the ones you believe have already been posted and addressed, then be specific. But the discussion will continue with or without your input, so we don't need to wait until you "clear them up" before moving on. (I know, I know, you didn't say "clear them up", you said "clear those up" and we don't need to start a thread about it.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by jar, posted 07-18-2005 5:19 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by jar, posted 07-18-2005 6:43 PM Monk has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 201 of 209 (224473)
07-18-2005 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 200 by Monk
07-18-2005 6:02 PM


Clear up the falsehoods.
Okay, let's clear up the falsehoods.
FDR...led us into World War II.
True or False?
Truman...finished that war and started one in Korea
True or False.
John F. Kennedy. ..started the Vietnam conflict in 1962.
True or False?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by Monk, posted 07-18-2005 6:02 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 202 by arachnophilia, posted 07-18-2005 7:30 PM jar has not replied
 Message 206 by Monk, posted 07-19-2005 7:13 PM jar has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1373 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 202 of 209 (224487)
07-18-2005 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 201 by jar
07-18-2005 6:43 PM


Re: Clear up the falsehoods.
yes, i agree. let's check the facts. but you got considerably further into the op than i did.
1. There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq during the month of January.....
true or false? the answer's in my message #12 of this thread. tal/monk/et al have not responded to it.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by jar, posted 07-18-2005 6:43 PM jar has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 203 of 209 (224493)
07-18-2005 7:49 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by Tal
07-18-2005 10:35 AM


What UN law prevents one country from conducting military operations in another country?
Article 2, Number 4 of the UN Charter.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by Tal, posted 07-18-2005 10:35 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by Tal, posted 07-19-2005 8:59 AM crashfrog has replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5706 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 204 of 209 (224577)
07-19-2005 8:59 AM
Reply to: Message 203 by crashfrog
07-18-2005 7:49 PM


4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
So the 14 other resolutions that Saddam broke don't count?
How does this apply to Operation Just Cause when we invaded Panama?
How does this apply to Operation Desert Fox when Clinton launched over 300 Cruise Missles at Iraq?
Guess the UN needs to declare sanctions against the US huh?
Why don't they?
This message has been edited by Tal, 07-19-2005 09:00 AM

I helped scare an old person-I stopped someone from keeping more of their money-So what if people want to have say in the places they live and the cars that they drive-I gave money to an environmental group that helped keep us dependant on foreign oil-I help the enemies of democracy get stronger by telling them laws don’t matter-What if one day I need an abortion-Sex with an intern, everybody does it-I help teach kids around America that America is always wrong
Do you know what your DNC stands for?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by crashfrog, posted 07-18-2005 7:49 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by jar, posted 07-19-2005 11:34 AM Tal has not replied
 Message 209 by crashfrog, posted 07-19-2005 7:40 PM Tal has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 205 of 209 (224610)
07-19-2005 11:34 AM
Reply to: Message 204 by Tal
07-19-2005 8:59 AM


How does this apply to Operation Just Cause when we invaded Panama?
Glad that you brought that up bubba.
Although we need to deal with the other falisies in your OP, once we have gotten you to correct them we can begin looking at that fiasco as well as Grenada, Lybia and some of the other actions of the Regan-Bush era.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by Tal, posted 07-19-2005 8:59 AM Tal has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 206 of 209 (224701)
07-19-2005 7:13 PM
Reply to: Message 201 by jar
07-18-2005 6:43 PM


Okay, let's clear up the falsehoods.
Before I answer, I’d like to make a point, if anyone cares. Tal can elaborate on this since it was his OP., but I believe his point was to show that there are numerous examples where the US has initiated unilateral military action against other countries. The case in Iraq was hardly unique.
Tal writes:
FDR...led us into World War II.
Technically, FDR did lead us into WWII because he was President at the time. As president, we entered the war with FDR leading us, so the answer to your question is yes, FDR led us into the war. But FDR and the US did not initiate pre-emptive military action against Germany, which is the point. He probably should have, but pressure to stay out of the war since it was none of our business, held sway especially after WWI. In Message 3 your comment was Germany declared war on the US. That’s true, their pact with Japan didn’t require them to, but they did so anyway, so I wouldn’t consider this an example of unilateral military action on the part of the US.
Tal writes:
Truman...finished that war and started one in Korea
And your previous response:
Jar writes:
North Korea invaded a US ally and the US was part of a UN Police Action.
But it’s still true that North Korea did not attack us. They invaded an ally sure, but they didn’t attack the US. Many of our allies have been invaded over the years without prompt reciprocal action on the part of the US. Many of our European allies were engaged in WWII in 1940, more than one year before the US was attacked by Japan, yet we didn’t consider the actions by Germany to be attacks on the US.
Tal writes:
John F. Kennedy. ..started the Vietnam conflict in 1962..
And your previous response:
Jar writes:
JFK didn't start the Vietnam involvement, that began under Eisenhower when we supported the French in French Indochina.
I see two words here with different meanings. Tal said started the Vietnam conflict, and you say start the Vietnam involvement. These are two entirely different things. The tensions were simmering under Eisenhower in the 1950’s, with our financial support of French action, but significant quantities of troops were not committed, we didn’t invade.
From Wikipedia , Many consider the 29 year war in Vietnam to be in two parts. The first part French and the second part American. So in a way both statements are correct. JFK didn’t start our involvement in Vietnam, but he did dramatically expand the conflict. By the time Kennedy was assassinated, he had increased the number of U.S. military personal that trained and fought with South Vietnamese troops, from 700 to 15,000. Tal might argue that expanding troop involvement by more than 20 times might constitute starting the conflict. I’m not sure.
It seems there was a gradual increase of military personnel, money, etc., punctuated by bursts of increased military buildups like the 1960-1962 time frame. I don’t know if there is one single date that we can say, It started on this date.
Here is what JFK said about Vietnam on February 7, 1962
quote:
There is a war going on in South Viet Nam. I think that last week there were over 500 killings, assassinations, bombings, and the casualties are high. As I said last week, it is a subterranean war, a guerrilla war, of increasing ferocity. The United States, since the end of the Geneva Accord setting up the South Vietnamese government as an independent government, has been assisting Viet Nam economically to maintain its independence and viability, and also has sent training groups out there, which have been expanded in recent weeks, as the attacks on the government and on the people of South Viet Nam have increased. Source

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by jar, posted 07-18-2005 6:43 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by jar, posted 07-19-2005 7:29 PM Monk has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 207 of 209 (224707)
07-19-2005 7:29 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by Monk
07-19-2005 7:13 PM


WoW.
Your response really saddens and frightens me.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by Monk, posted 07-19-2005 7:13 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by Monk, posted 07-19-2005 7:35 PM jar has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 208 of 209 (224711)
07-19-2005 7:35 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by jar
07-19-2005 7:29 PM


Your response really saddens and frightens me.
Seems like everything frightens and saddens you. It also seems everything is stupid in your book.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by jar, posted 07-19-2005 7:29 PM jar has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 209 of 209 (224714)
07-19-2005 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 204 by Tal
07-19-2005 8:59 AM


So the 14 other resolutions that Saddam broke don't count?
In that none of them specify military action in the even of non-compliance, no, they don't count.
Guess the UN needs to declare sanctions against the US huh?
Well, in point of fact, they would be unable to, since the US holds a veto on the Security Council. Which you would have known if you had bothered to inform yourself about the issue before shooting your mouth off.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by Tal, posted 07-19-2005 8:59 AM Tal has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024