Bones of Contentions.

First - a quick question. Why should I take the guy seriously?I did a quick google and there is nothing in his background that suggests any evidence of academic rigor or expertise around the TOE. why should I take the time to listen to him and not just stick him in the crackfile with the rest of the creationist "professors".

But that's my point - A masters is nothing (in terms of the sciences). Surely the relative merits of qualifications cannot be that different between here and there?You have to have a filtering process otherwise, you would be overwhelm with refuting every piece of rubbish that came along. That guy doesn't have the minimum level for me to even read his stuff.A discussion of this will take us off the path - let's leave it at that?This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 24-Jul-2005 06:40 AMThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 24-Jul-2005 06:40 AM