Why Darwinism is wrong

Well, a lot of this gets into how you classify an intermediary.But my point on whales is that if evolutionists found out that creatures appeared to be intermediaries between whales and fish, then they would say whales evolved from fish, and that land mammals evolved from whales, not that whales would be called anything but mammals.They would posit the so-called intermediaries you speak of as having descended from whales, not the other way around.This message has been edited by randman, 07-29-2005 05:55 PM

Mark, you display the typical problem of evolutionism. You want it to be science, but you are not willing to examine the assumptions by which you judge individual pieces of evidence without resorting to attacking creationism and effectively arguing that evolution must be right because you think creationism is a weaker case.You guys are not arguing science, but ideology.