Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 87 (8927 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-24-2019 3:49 AM
29 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), Tangle (4 members, 25 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Jedothek
Post Volume:
Total: 860,354 Year: 15,390/19,786 Month: 2,113/3,058 Week: 487/404 Day: 2/89 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1
2
Author Topic:   July 2005, Post of the Month
bobbins
Member (Idle past 1845 days)
Posts: 122
From: Manchester, England
Joined: 06-23-2005


Message 16 of 22 (223999)
07-15-2005 7:09 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Asgara
07-14-2005 11:49 PM


Re: UK look at US budget
As a previously nominated Mancunian so aptly said,

I'm right chuffed!

That's thank you over here.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Asgara, posted 07-14-2005 11:49 PM Asgara has not yet responded

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 209 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 17 of 22 (225798)
07-23-2005 8:04 PM


mick, for his "leftist" views
name: mick
forum: cofee house
thread: far left - us/uk definition
post#: 60.

Message 60

i had jokingly remarked that "facts are leftist" in response to ring-wing notion that many news agencies that simply report the news without spin are "leftist." mick clearly defines the difference between tabloids and reputable newspapers, in the usage of commentary, and explains the status of the us media.

the irony, i'm sure, is that mick will get accused of a left bias for simply reporting the facts.


אָרַח

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by bobbins, posted 07-24-2005 8:04 PM arachnophilia has not yet responded
 Message 19 by bobbins, posted 07-24-2005 9:30 PM arachnophilia has not yet responded

bobbins
Member (Idle past 1845 days)
Posts: 122
From: Manchester, England
Joined: 06-23-2005


Message 18 of 22 (226037)
07-24-2005 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by arachnophilia
07-23-2005 8:04 PM


Re: mick, for his "leftist" views
and he did!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by arachnophilia, posted 07-23-2005 8:04 PM arachnophilia has not yet responded

  
bobbins
Member (Idle past 1845 days)
Posts: 122
From: Manchester, England
Joined: 06-23-2005


Message 19 of 22 (226049)
07-24-2005 9:30 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by arachnophilia
07-23-2005 8:04 PM


Re: mick, for his "leftist" views
I second the nomination - he said exactly what I should have said a week ago, and a whole lot clearer than I could have done.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by arachnophilia, posted 07-23-2005 8:04 PM arachnophilia has not yet responded

  
Faith
Member
Posts: 32715
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 20 of 22 (226114)
07-25-2005 5:22 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by AdminAsgara
07-02-2005 7:36 PM


Sorry, I absolutely HAVE to object to the nomination of mick for POTM, if EvC cares at all about its standards, as explained here:

Concerning Mick's POTM nomination


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by AdminAsgara, posted 07-02-2005 7:36 PM AdminAsgara has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by CK, posted 07-25-2005 5:26 AM Faith has not yet responded

  
CK
Member (Idle past 2359 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 21 of 22 (226115)
07-25-2005 5:26 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Faith
07-25-2005 5:22 AM


I've checked the post in question and it seems fine to me. I may pinch it to use in other places.

This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 25-Jul-2005 05:28 AM


This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Faith, posted 07-25-2005 5:22 AM Faith has not yet responded

Chiroptera
Member
Posts: 6770
From: Oklahoma
Joined: 09-28-2003
Member Rating: 5.6


Message 22 of 22 (227837)
07-30-2005 2:53 PM


sidelined and checking up on those scientists
Name: sidelined
Forum: Is It Science?
Thread: All Evolutionary scientists have been Evolutionary Indoctrinated
Post #: 48

A nice post making a very good point. How can we trust that the scientists are telling us the truth? The answer is that if you have reason to distrust them, then educate yourself enough so you have the expertise to evaluate their claims. Very nice point.


Prev1
2
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019