Please, no replies, this is off-topic. --Admin
If the motivation is related, as suggested, to my comments, then I feel it is right and proper to address that here, and maybe elsewhere where my name and character have been repeatedly falsely maligned and misrepresented by some evolutionists here.
The simple fact is I have repeatedly brought up erroneous use of materials and claims, often overstatements, produced by evolutionists in arguing for ToE in educational materials such as textbooks, web-sites, TV shows, popular magazines like National Geographic.
Starting a thread on peer-reviewed papers in this area thus appears to seek to dodge the point entirely, and ignore the principal means by which evolutionists convince the public and students of their ideas.
Since that seems to be what this thread is about, I will refrain from posting on this thread, except to reiterate that it is a false claim and insinuation, imo, to suggest I would need to reference peer-reviewed literature to back up my claims, and in general, I consider evolutionist's claims as put forth to students and the public to be more relevant in terms of the effect of overstatements convincing the public the data says one thing when, in fact, it does not.
This message has been edited by Admin, 08-10-2005 06:17 PM
™ Version 4.2
