EvC Forum: Nothing

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Nothing

joz

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 12 of 31 (23297)
11-19-2002 8:07 PM

Reply to: Message 11 by forgiven
11-19-2002 6:42 PM

quote:
Originally posted by forgiven:
^^^ whew... i doubt if this'll ever make sense to me, it seems so anti-intuitive... even if i think of the singularity occupying a non-point in non-time, containing all that is, i can't understand how once it explodes (or whatever) that non-point fails to become a *real* point of reference for all time

Because the non point contained every point in the protouniverse and can`t therefore be a point in the universe?

[This message has been edited by joz, 11-19-2002]

This message is a reply to:
	Message 11 by forgiven, posted 11-19-2002 6:42 PM		forgiven has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 13 by Mike Holland, posted 11-20-2002 6:48 AM		joz has not replied

joz

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 19 of 31 (23437)
11-20-2002 10:45 PM

Reply to: Message 18 by forgiven
11-20-2002 4:56 PM

quote:
Originally posted by forgiven:
sigh, here i thought i had an original thought... alas, it's never been thus, never will be

Sorry to bear the bad news bud but its worse than that your concept of innate ideas over on the "Knowledge" thread reads pretty similarly to Descartes....

Nice to see you and John playing nice with each other BTW, isn`t it far more productive...

This message is a reply to:
	Message 18 by forgiven, posted 11-20-2002 4:56 PM		forgiven has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 20 by forgiven, posted 11-20-2002 11:10 PM		joz has replied

joz

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 21 of 31 (23453)
11-21-2002 12:05 AM

Reply to: Message 20 by forgiven
11-20-2002 11:10 PM

quote:
Originally posted by forgiven:
oh well, mack... i guess i'll sit back and await your original thoughts... and yes, john and i seem to have gotten off on the wrong foot... this is more productive, for both i hope

Don`t hold your breath I readily acknowledge that most of what I`m putting forward against innate ideas is a(n) (inferior? probably) reworking of Locke....

This message is a reply to:
	Message 20 by forgiven, posted 11-20-2002 11:10 PM		forgiven has not replied

joz

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 23 of 31 (23471)
11-21-2002 8:03 AM

Reply to: Message 22 by John
11-21-2002 12:25 AM

quote:
Originally posted by John:
Craig?

William Lane Craig....

(I assume from the context)....

This message is a reply to:
	Message 22 by John, posted 11-21-2002 12:25 AM		John has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 24 by John, posted 11-21-2002 8:45 AM		joz has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

8 online now:	Aussie, candle2, dwise1, Percy (Admin), Rahvin, Tangle, Taq, xongsmith
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,843 Year: 4,100/9,624 Month: 971/974 Week: 298/286 Day: 19/40 Hour: 0/3