|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,488 Year: 3,745/9,624 Month: 616/974 Week: 229/276 Day: 5/64 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Bones of Contentions. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
What the hell does intellegence have to do with evolution?
Do you have even a clue what evolution is or the Theory of Evolution says? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I believe that intellegence was certainly one of the factors in the survival of the critters that became hSs. I believe that one of the indicators that can be used to distinguish between homo sapiens and earlier primates in the line is relative brain size.
But... I don't believe that intellegence or brain size has anything to do with either the TOE or evolution. Lot's of critters have evolved and done just fine with no brain at all. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I don't think you will find any place in my post where I equate intellegence with relative brain size. Sorry but you'll have to point that out. I did say that relative brain size is one method that can be used to distinguish species in the human ancestral lineage.
Frankly, I would imagine that the first person who learned to chip flint to make a cutting edge was likely as intellegent as the average person today. Certainly the person who first made bread was a genius. While intellegence, adaptability has been a hallmark in the evolution of man, it is not necessary to Evolution. Virus evolve. Are they intellegent? Thus, intellegence is not a factor in evolution. Survival is. Evolution is history, it's the story of what worked. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Evolution is a history. It's simply a summary of what happened.
I don't know of anything that suggests that modern humans are more intellegent than earlier primates. Why would that even be a factor?
Natural selection supposedly propagates those billions (trillions) of allegedly beneficial random mutations that enhance survival and reproductive benefits to eventually produce human beings. Nope. Not really the way it happened.
You seem to say you do not equate intelligence with brain size - so what is the benefit that supposedly retained the mutated brains in the hominid critter gene pool? Was increased brain size simply a neutral mutation and didn’t add any intelligence? Why do you suppose larger brains would be a selected trait — increased ability to deliver lethal head butts on enemies? I don't have a clue what you're talking about there. Try again using other words and maybe I'll see what you're asking.
I humbly suggest you appear to be attempting to ignore the obvious and evade the questions that present particular problems for your beliefs. Maybe I’m reading you wrongly. Could be because I don't have a clue what you're talking about either.
That would be how many million years ago Jar? Why would you imagine that? Is their any evidence? The evidence I’m aware of suggests intelligence on par with us first appeared coincident with the oldest recorded history on Earth - only 5000 years ago (give or take). Wouldn’t you think that evidence at least a little bit odd if reasonably intellignet folks like us have really been bumming around for millions of years? Well, what do you mean by recorded history. The Venus of Willendorf dates to around 20,000 BCE or even earlier. Stone tools dating to 10-12,000 years ago have been found in the Americas. Why would I think the creator of the Venus of Willendorf was any less intellegent than anyone today? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Well,let me try to explain my position in another way. Perhaps it will become clearer.
I said that I don't believe intellegence is a necessary component of Evolution. The reason I believe that is true is that there are myriads of very successful critters that have evolved with little or no intellegence. In relation to humans, I see no evidence that todays humans are nay more intellegent than those from considerably distant in the past. But before going much further, I think we need to come up with some working definition of intellegence. For the purposes of this thread, would you agree that we are talking about that capability that can be used to imagine new solutions to problems? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Is it racist to distinguish between homo Sapiens and frogs?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
(1) Creationist Marvin Lubenow is not a "professor" properly speaking, unless he has a doctorate degree in the field he is (supposedly) teaching or "professing" and claiming otherwise is snake-oil selling. What? Say it isn't so?
Biography for Professor Lubenow Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
What common theory?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I believe there is near unanimous agreement that this relationship was at least partly responsible for the supposed evoluition from critter to man via incremental beneficial brain mutations. No? No. Where have you shown that is a common theory. I tried many pages ago to engage you in a discussion of just this issue. Perhaps this time you won't simply run away and we can move through this in a reasonable manner. First, would you agree that there are no indications that intellegence is required as a condition of evolution? Are plants intelegent? Are viruses intellegent? Are bacteria intelegent? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
John, you are a hard person to discuss anything with. I agree you're ignoring me.
Please understand I'm old and slow and so need to deal with things one small step at a time. Humor me please. You asked:
I believe there is near unanimous agreement that this relationship (brain size relation to intelligence) was at least partly responsible for the supposed evoluition from critter to man via incremental beneficial brain mutations. No? That is a direct question. I responded:
No. Where have you shown that is a common theory. That is an answer and a request for you to provide supporting material. I then asked a few follow up questions that I believe are needed before we can move further.
First, would you agree that there are no indications that intellegence is required as a condition of evolution? Are plants intelegent? Are viruses intellegent? Are bacteria intelegent? If you will support your assertions and answer my questions whe can then try to move forward towards resolution of your issue regarding intellegence and brain size. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
John.
Enjoy your stay here. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
What in the world are you talking about?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
John Ponce writes: If only RAZD was available, he could have admonished Einstein for his "willful ignorance". You weren't there but Bohr was and responded for you. LOL Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024