|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: molecular genetic evidence for a multipurpose genome | |||||||||||||||||||
derwood Member (Idle past 1896 days) Posts: 1457 Joined: |
quote: So, I guess you can't supply any laboratory observations supporting YECism after all....
|
|||||||||||||||||||
derwood Member (Idle past 1896 days) Posts: 1457 Joined: |
quote: What monkenstick said... You are really out there...
|
|||||||||||||||||||
derwood Member (Idle past 1896 days) Posts: 1457 Joined: |
quote: Actually, message #10 in that thread was written by you, not me.quote: I don't email you anything. I post to a discussion board, just like you. However, Peter, there is a pesky thing called context. What you quote above came from message 26, not 10. The part you apparently forgot to read - written by YOU - to which I was replyiing: "Thus, this gene is not under selective constraint and has not been selected for during millions of years. Unless you would like to assume neutral selection. I have posted a couple of e-mails to evolutionary theorist to figure out what they exacly mean by neutral selection. None of them responded, demonstrating the current problem in NDT." That is what YOU wrote. Here is what I quoted form your source: "a comparison between fixed and polymorphic sites between the two species shows also no significant deviation from the assumption of a neutral evolution in this region. New emphasis mine. This quote is at odds with your comment that I quote above. Neutral evolutionis not neutral selection. Of course, Peter, I am not the one claiming that conserved sequence in introns falsifies the Neutral Theory. Am I?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
derwood Member (Idle past 1896 days) Posts: 1457 Joined: |
quote: Williams has conceded the point that he is not interested in science. His laughable criterion (observation in a lab) - which of course does not cover his own mythological fantasy - demonstrates this.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
derwood Member (Idle past 1896 days) Posts: 1457 Joined: |
quote: Your biased, lopsided, arbitrary, and laughably naive "criterion" is duly noted. Please Williams, tell us all about the OBSERVED - in a controlled lab setting, that is - science that supports a 10,000 year old earth and subsequent creation (and subsequent slaughter, then subsequent magical regeneration) of all creatures. Surely, you MUST be able to do this, lest yourb demand that the 'evos' show you the same for their position rings awfully shallow and hollow, no? Of course, I can see right through this, Williams. Should such an occurrance be presented, would Williams accept it and say "Oh well, guess I was wrong. Evolution via generation of new information really can happen." LOL! No - Williams already has an out. You see, were this shown to him, he would claim that is was evidence not for evolution, but for creation. Bcause after all, humans had to "design" the experiments. They had to manipulate nature. Therefore, it is proof that Goddidit. This is an old creationist trick. Randy Wysong already pre-rejected any such laboratory science in his laughable 1976 book, and creationists great and small have been using it ever since. It is a sham. But the reader willnotice that WIlliams is still ignoring the scenairto in which a gene duplication without subsequent mutation alters phenotype. The "new information" argument is already moot, and informed creationists know this. That is why creationists still use this argument - because there is no such thing as an informed creationist...
|
|||||||||||||||||||
derwood Member (Idle past 1896 days) Posts: 1457 Joined: |
quote: If biblical creation were true, we should find humans and tricertops (or any other actual dinosaur) in contemporaneous strata. Indeed, there shold be thousands of such findings. Where are they, fred?quote: Yes, we should find tons of human fossils alongside - literally, in some cases, I'm sure - all sorts of leviathans and dinosaurs. We should have all sorts of creation science 're-creating' the original kinds in a lab. With all the money that these groups haul in, you'd think that maybe the ICR grad school of something would have produced the goods by now.quote: Again, does anyone really care what a YEC electrical engineer thinks about anything but electrical engineering issues?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
derwood Member (Idle past 1896 days) Posts: 1457 Joined: |
quote: Apparently, you missed the part where Borger lets it slip that his ... 'theory' is actually not cretinism friendly.. Of course, one would have to be a complete moron to think that any of this anti-evolution claptrap has merit.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
derwood Member (Idle past 1896 days) Posts: 1457 Joined: |
quote: Mantras aside, Williams simply misrepresents the situation. His naivete in science shines brightly, and grows stronger with nearly every post.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
derwood Member (Idle past 1896 days) Posts: 1457 Joined: |
quote: Funny how Williams blows this all off with his childish mantra about 'rhetoric'.... Guess the cretin doesn't like it when his own ... 'logic'.... is thrown back in his face...
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024