So, I think to be more accurate you should use 'hebrew' or 'Israelite'.
Yup, Hebrew's would be a better term, I agree.
Secondly, and what I think is a more seriously problem is that the Bible never states that the Hebrews built any pyramids, they were only employed in the building of the store cities of Pithom and Rameses (exodus 1.11).
So can you tell me what makes you think that they were employed in building pyramids?
Archaeologist, but No Egyptologist am I!
I have long had a bias against "armchair archaeology" and Egyptology and it's come back to nip me in the bum!
After posting and reading responses I have gone and looked up some stuff online. It seems that this assumption on my part is incorrect. The Pyramids (the famous ones anyway) don't appear to have been built on the back of Hebrew labor. My bad.
My point in the thread however was this -- there is physical evidence of the work the Hebrews did while enslaved by Egypt. Therefore there are parts of the Bible which do in fact have a great deal of external evidence for being factual, while other parts do not.