Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Commands from God and his general level of interaction in the modern age
Phat
Member
Posts: 18292
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 46 of 56 (238208)
08-29-2005 6:42 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Faith
08-29-2005 4:14 AM


Interactions with God: Medium induced? Perhaps mediated!
Lets review some basic Merriam Webster definitions:
1)medium \me-de-em\ n, pl mediums or media \-de-e\ [L] 1 : something in a middle position; also : a middle position or degree 2 : a means of effecting or conveying something 3 : a surrounding or enveloping substance 4 : a channel or system of communication, information, or entertainment 5 : a mode of artistic expression 6 : an individual held to be a channel of communication between the earthly world and a world of spirits 7 : a condition or environment in which something may function or flourish
2)medium adj : intermediate in amount, quality, position, or degree
Based on Webster, all of us are mediums.
Remember the famous quotation of
arshall McLuhan?
media \me-de-e\ n, pl medias : medium 4
The Bible calls Jesus the Mediator between God and man. What does Webster have to say about this word? What does Strongs have to say?
mediate \me-de-at\ vb -ated; -ating 1 : to act as an intermediary; esp : to work with opposing sides in order to resolve (as a dispute) or bring about (as a settlement) 2 : to bring about, influence, or transmit (as a physical process or effect) by acting as an intermediate or controlling agent or mechanism syn intercede, intervene, interpose, interfere mediation \me-de-a-shen\ n mediator \me-de-a-ter\ n
NIV writes:
Gal 3:19-22--The law was put into effect through angels by a mediator. A mediator, however, does not represent just one party; but God is one. Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.
But the Scripture declares that the whole world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised, being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe.
Strongs calls a mediator an internunciator or (by implication) an intercessor or a reconciler.
The O.T. word, medium in the NIV, is "familiar spirit" in the KJV.
Familiar meaning recognized, to instruct or designate..(as familiar)
Based on the root :To Know.
A medium seems intent on a one way message from point A to oneself.
A mediator, by contrast, knows both parties (A) and (B) and seeks reconciliation.
Question to ponder: If "spirits" exist, how many basic kinds, alligences, or messages are there?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Faith, posted 08-29-2005 4:14 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Faith, posted 08-29-2005 10:45 PM Phat has replied

  
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 56 (238272)
08-29-2005 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by coffee_addict
08-28-2005 11:40 PM


History can't be used to generalize for people that believe in God today. I didn't take part in the Spanish Inquisition, I have killed no Indians. And I am Christian.
Christians are people, and people do these things, not because they believe in Jesus. The gospels show contrary views to a lot of Christians, especially the Christians on TV, and the Christians who exterminated people throughout history.
quote:
The thing is if you do hate you probably either doesn't realize that it is hate or that you rationalize to yourself that it is not hate.
Who would I hate? Why would I hate others? I have no motives...
(You might be banned, try to respond later, I really want to know about what you think of me as a Christian.)

porteus@gmail.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by coffee_addict, posted 08-28-2005 11:40 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Nighttrain, posted 08-29-2005 8:55 PM joshua221 has replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4012 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 48 of 56 (238396)
08-29-2005 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by joshua221
08-29-2005 11:38 AM


History
History can't be used to generalize for people that believe in God today. I didn't take part in the Spanish Inquisition, I have killed no Indians. And I am Christian.
You don`t get off the hook that easily, Prophex. Those Christ-killers through history were using the same dogma that captures you today. No essential re-writes took place in Scriptures to clean up Christianity. Religion bends the Scriptures to suit whatever suits its purpose. Another society? Teach them our superior ways and kill those who resist. Another religion? Kill them as pagans or infidels. Another Christian interpretation? Torture and kill the heretics. All in the name of love. Still going on today. As long as Christians justify their actions from the Scriptures, anything goes. When they eventually accept the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as the prime arbiter of human behavior, we might see a change, but I`m not holding my breath.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by joshua221, posted 08-29-2005 11:38 AM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by joshua221, posted 08-29-2005 9:27 PM Nighttrain has replied
 Message 53 by TheLiteralist, posted 08-30-2005 6:03 AM Nighttrain has not replied

  
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 56 (238418)
08-29-2005 9:27 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Nighttrain
08-29-2005 8:55 PM


Re: History
quote:
You don`t get off the hook that easily, Prophex.
What you fail to realize, is that for me, the hook doesn't exist.
quote:
Those Christ-killers through history were using the same dogma that captures you today. No essential re-writes took place in Scriptures to clean up Christianity.
Actually most of "those Christ-killers" interpreted what I have read to be totally different, forming it around their actions for justification.
quote:
Religion bends the Scriptures to suit whatever suits its purpose.
You personify 'religion', PEOPLE bend the meanings.
quote:
Another society? Teach them our superior ways and kill those who resist. Another religion? Kill them as pagans or infidels. Another Christian interpretation? Torture and kill the heretics. All in the name of love.
What do you think love means? I always thought it was a good thing. The people we are talking about didn't use love, or justify what they were doing with love, they used Greed, and became dehumanized. We already know our history, but you seem to target Christians, what about Nazis, or Capitalists, I mean, People do these things no matter what they believe in, thoughtout history.
What I believe in is simply beautiful, and has shown me to love, not to kill. So stop twisting Jesus.
quote:
Still going on today.
PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF CHRISTIANS KILLING IN THE NAME OF GOD TODAY
quote:
When they eventually accept the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as the prime arbiter of human behavior, we might see a change, but I`m not holding my breath.
What are you talking about?
I know there are things wrong with the Christian community, but when hasn't there been since the time of Jesus?
Heres a human rights declaration that solves everthing. Matthew 22:38
"Love your neighbor as yourself" -Jesus
This is what should be followed, screw the declaration of human rights, this covers it all.

porteus@gmail.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Nighttrain, posted 08-29-2005 8:55 PM Nighttrain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Nighttrain, posted 08-30-2005 4:14 AM joshua221 has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1462 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 50 of 56 (238447)
08-29-2005 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Phat
08-29-2005 6:42 AM


Re: Interactions with God: Medium induced? Perhaps mediated!
I have no idea what you meant to be saying in that post, Phat. I don't see how all those definitions clarify anything.
Are you claiming a Christian can be a medium?
Christ is our mediator. A medium is not a mediator. A medium in the sense Charles asked the question is what I said, somebody who communicates with demons. A "familiar spirit" is a demon, one a medium hangs out with.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Phat, posted 08-29-2005 6:42 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Phat, posted 08-29-2005 11:47 PM Faith has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18292
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 51 of 56 (238461)
08-29-2005 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Faith
08-29-2005 10:45 PM


Re: Interactions with God: Medium induced? Perhaps mediated!
You are right, and that was my point. The reason that the Jehovahs witnesses have it wrong is because they see Jesus as just a messenger...a go-between from Jehovah to humanity.(like an angel)
Remember my objective/subjective discussion? A King is an object...we are subjects. God is the King, yet it is impossible to love a great field of energy, or a cloud, or a great pillar of fire...with all of ones heart, soul, mind, and strength. Likewise, we do not even have it within us to love our neighbor as ourselves.
This is why a mediator was and is needed. A mediator who understands God because He is God, yet who understands man because He is a man.
A mere messenger angel would never be able to reconcile humanity to God. That was my point.
Notice how Hebrews calls Jesus:
NIV writes:
Heb 12:1-2
2 Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.
Now...author \o-ther\ n originator, author, fr. augere to increase 1 : one that originates or creates 2 : one that writes or composes a literary work
Jesus was more than a messanger. He was the very Creator made flesh who dwelt among us. Only then can He be a true mediator.
As for the issue of "familiar" spirits---mediums--think familial.
After the Fall, every other spirit besides the Holy One became familiar...or familial. People rejected Christ (and still do) because His Spirit is the Spirit of God...not the spirit of familiarity that pervades humanity. This is why so many can agree to reject christ while holding on to their own (familiar) human wisdom and/or other wannabe gods and devotions which also are so familiar.
In other words, ye shall be as gods....turns into the Tower of Babel scenario where the people have become as one...(familiarity) yet without a Capstone (Jesus Christ) but a pyramid with the eye of Baal
the idolatrous spirit of human wisdom.
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 08-29-2005 10:11 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Faith, posted 08-29-2005 10:45 PM Faith has not replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4012 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 52 of 56 (238494)
08-30-2005 4:14 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by joshua221
08-29-2005 9:27 PM


Re: History
PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF CHRISTIANS KILLING IN THE NAME OF GOD TODAY
We`re not talking about you, or Nazis or capitalists, we`re talking about religion in action. It`s the doctrine that enables killers to justify their actions. Whether a Jew blowing up a refugee camp, an Islamic terrorist taking out civilians on trains, or a Christian using 'smart bombs' that go astray and wipe out unarmed women and children, all can find justification. Till religionists stop pointing the finger at others and start cleaning out their own nest, they will be tarred with the same brush.
Try these sites for Christians in action. You do remember Bosnia, don`t you?
http://www.gendercide.org/case_kosovo.html
The 1995 gendercide on Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica - Gendercide
If you want a roll-call of the last 60 odd years, I sure I can dig it up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by joshua221, posted 08-29-2005 9:27 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by joshua221, posted 08-30-2005 1:37 PM Nighttrain has replied

  
TheLiteralist
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 56 (238511)
08-30-2005 6:03 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Nighttrain
08-29-2005 8:55 PM


Re: History
Nighttrain writes:
were using the same dogma that captures you today. No essential re-writes took place in Scriptures to clean up Christianity.
No. This is not true. Catholicism, for instance, spent a long time hiding the scriptures from people -- they only allowed it to be printed in Latin, as I recall (not the language of their parishoners). My mother was Catholic...when she was a child, they still conducted many services in Latin, which no one understood (except, presumeably the priest). Furthermore, quite an argument can be made that catholicism does not resemble biblical christianity in the least.
Catholicism is a political power (a kingdom of this world). God's church is a kingdom not of this world. How many world leaders (including Bush!) consult the Pope? How many world leaders consulted the apostle Peter?
(note I don't trust Bush, and I don't trust the Pope!)
Catholics do what their pope tells them to. If that command is to kill Indians in the new world, then Catholics will do it (though probably not American catholics...as they are rebellious catholics).
The Pope is not God. The Pope is not Christ. The apostle Peter was not a Pope.
Christians do what Christ tells them to do...His commandments are clearly outlined in the new testament.
--Jason
This message has been edited by TheLiteralist, 08-30-2005 06:04 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Nighttrain, posted 08-29-2005 8:55 PM Nighttrain has not replied

  
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 54 of 56 (238608)
08-30-2005 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Nuggin
08-28-2005 11:36 PM


Re: The whole point of the thread...
quote:
I would guess that if you authentically heard the voice of God, you wouldn't mistake it with schizophrenia, but the opposite is not necessarily true. That's very scary.
A command from God wouldn't be scary, gimme some evidence that God would tell me to kill people, or has before. I know in the OT there are moments, like Moses being a messenger for God's judgement, but I don't think you can find anything for me.

porteus@gmail.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Nuggin, posted 08-28-2005 11:36 PM Nuggin has not replied

  
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 56 (238610)
08-30-2005 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Nighttrain
08-30-2005 4:14 AM


Re: History
quote:
we`re talking about religion in action.
You can't blame religion, the people that believe in a religion are to blame.
quote:
or a Christian using 'smart bombs' that go astray and wipe out unarmed women and children
When? What did that Christian say after it happened?
quote:
It`s the doctrine that enables killers to justify their actions. Whether a Jew blowing up a refugee camp, an Islamic terrorist taking out civilians on trains
Islam doesn't tell people to kill people, the 'terrorist' usually has motives relative to land, holy city occupation, or political opposition.
Provide me with real life examples please, stop with this pretending.

porteus@gmail.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Nighttrain, posted 08-30-2005 4:14 AM Nighttrain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Nighttrain, posted 08-31-2005 9:19 PM joshua221 has not replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4012 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 56 of 56 (239255)
08-31-2005 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by joshua221
08-30-2005 1:37 PM


Re: History
Islam doesn't tell people to kill people, the 'terrorist' usually has motives relative to land, holy city occupation, or political opposition.
Read a little Wahabbi history.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by joshua221, posted 08-30-2005 1:37 PM joshua221 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024