Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,341 Year: 3,598/9,624 Month: 469/974 Week: 82/276 Day: 10/23 Hour: 4/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hurricane Katrina
dsv
Member (Idle past 4742 days)
Posts: 220
From: Secret Underground Hideout
Joined: 08-17-2004


Message 166 of 315 (239819)
09-01-2005 10:25 PM
Reply to: Message 162 by Thor
09-01-2005 10:14 PM


Re: Louisiana without clout
So we're taking the alternative of a "wait and see" policy? I don't see any marines on the ground taking control of the city and surely we can't just let people starve.
Furthermore, I'm not talking about landing. I'm talking about dropping. I'm talking about an African resource type of operation. This is a desperate measure but something needs to be done. Choppers can and do fly tight in situations that call for it.
This is why we have a military that spends trillions of dollars on training. First and foremost it's protecting our citizens.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by Thor, posted 09-01-2005 10:14 PM Thor has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by randman, posted 09-01-2005 10:32 PM dsv has replied
 Message 173 by RAZD, posted 09-01-2005 11:10 PM dsv has not replied
 Message 175 by Thor, posted 09-01-2005 11:16 PM dsv has not replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4917 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 167 of 315 (239820)
09-01-2005 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 162 by Thor
09-01-2005 10:14 PM


Re: Louisiana without clout
marines with amphibious vehicles
There are a lots of options. It just looks to me like the Homeland Security stuff is load of crap. FEMA worked better before they were put under Homeland Security.
What we needed down there was some strong leadership commandeering forces to evacuate all of the people, and to have 10,000 or more armed troops, 101st and Marines, and tell them to shoot anyone looting, except for grocery stores, which imo is not really looting since the food would go bad anyway and the people need supplies.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by Thor, posted 09-01-2005 10:14 PM Thor has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Thor, posted 09-01-2005 11:19 PM randman has replied
 Message 206 by Lizard Breath, posted 09-02-2005 3:01 PM randman has replied
 Message 212 by robinrohan, posted 09-02-2005 4:35 PM randman has not replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4917 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 168 of 315 (239821)
09-01-2005 10:32 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by dsv
09-01-2005 10:25 PM


Re: Louisiana without clout
I'm with you. This is deplorable. We need some leadership bad, and when it doesn't happen, Bush should step in to make it happen.
Declare martial law. What I wish the president had done and would do is put one man in charge of all of the resources, and give him a special cell-phone number direct to the president, and tell the guy the president is available personally night and day, and that anytime he needs back-up, call the president on the phone and let him talk to whoever needs to be corrected, and just get the job done.
This has been heart-breaking to watch. It really seem negligent.
Of course, the president should not have to be the one to make this happen. First off, the governor of Louisiana should be making it happen. Secondly, the FEMA guys should be doing something more, but really in a catastrophe this size, we should have had the military take-over entirely and told them to restore and maintain order, and immediately evacuate the people from the city.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by dsv, posted 09-01-2005 10:25 PM dsv has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 169 by dsv, posted 09-01-2005 10:40 PM randman has not replied

dsv
Member (Idle past 4742 days)
Posts: 220
From: Secret Underground Hideout
Joined: 08-17-2004


Message 169 of 315 (239823)
09-01-2005 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by randman
09-01-2005 10:32 PM


Re: Louisiana without clout
but really in a catastrophe this size, we should have had the military take-over entirely and told them to restore and maintain order, and immediately evacuate the people from the city.
I agree, especially when the mayor and the citizens are begging for it. As the mayor of New Orleans said, S.O.S!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by randman, posted 09-01-2005 10:32 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 185 by Monk, posted 09-02-2005 2:21 AM dsv has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 413 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 170 of 315 (239824)
09-01-2005 10:40 PM


I'm sorry but many of the comments in this thread are just plain funny.
You folk seem surprised?
Were you really that clueless?
What will your reaction be when something really big happens?
Why are you worrying about what should have been done?
When will you start planning for the future?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by crashfrog, posted 09-02-2005 9:52 AM jar has not replied
 Message 252 by tsig, posted 09-03-2005 3:50 PM jar has not replied

Monk
Member (Idle past 3943 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 171 of 315 (239825)
09-01-2005 10:41 PM


Not just the coast
My sister and her husband survived the storm in Ocean Springs, MS which is just north of Biloxi. They watched as homes on either side of their location were demolished. When they evacuated, they drove north on Hwy 49 up through Hattiesburg and on to Jackson where my other sister lives.
All along the way, there was complete devastation. Every single power pole they passed was down. It didn't really start to get any better until they approached Jackson which is 150 miles away.
All of the media coverage is focused on the coastal areas, but it is much worse than that.

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by RAZD, posted 09-01-2005 11:08 PM Monk has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 172 of 315 (239827)
09-01-2005 11:08 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by Monk
09-01-2005 10:41 PM


Re: Not just the coast
Glad they were able to get out. I used to live in Pascagoula, and there was one tropical depression that came over while we were there - that was bad enough thanks.
of course, then we moved to "tornado alley" ...

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Monk, posted 09-01-2005 10:41 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 176 by Monk, posted 09-01-2005 11:17 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 173 of 315 (239828)
09-01-2005 11:10 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by dsv
09-01-2005 10:25 PM


Re: Louisiana without clout
you mean like the food and medical supplies that were dropped in Afghanistan?

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by dsv, posted 09-01-2005 10:25 PM dsv has not replied

Thor
Member (Idle past 5929 days)
Posts: 148
From: Sydney, Australia
Joined: 12-20-2004


Message 174 of 315 (239829)
09-01-2005 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 164 by jar
09-01-2005 10:19 PM


Re: Louisiana without clout
Somalia
My thoughts exactly.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by jar, posted 09-01-2005 10:19 PM jar has not replied

Thor
Member (Idle past 5929 days)
Posts: 148
From: Sydney, Australia
Joined: 12-20-2004


Message 175 of 315 (239830)
09-01-2005 11:16 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by dsv
09-01-2005 10:25 PM


Re: Louisiana without clout
So we're taking the alternative of a "wait and see" policy?
I certainly hope not. I’d really like to see something better done, I was just speculating on the problems that be have to be overcome.
Furthermore, I'm not talking about landing. I'm talking about dropping.
Yes, but that would appear to have it’s problems too. To drop supplies, there needs to be places to drop it. In Africa there are big open spaces of dry ground to drop things on. In a city, a flooded city no less, there are few good drop zones, and if food supplies were to be dropped into flood water full of corpses, waste and god only knows what else, could be more harmful than good. Then there is still the issue of the armed gangs.
This is why we have a military that spends trillions of dollars on training. First and foremost it's protecting our citizens.
Which makes me wonder why so many of them are in Iraq.
Anyway, I certainly don’t want to defend the inaction of the powers that be, I’m just trying to visualise what they have to work with. It’s really quite tragic that they have to work out how to deal with these issues now, after the fact, when some contingency planning before the fact may have dealt with at least some of them. Hundreds of lives may have been saved.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by dsv, posted 09-01-2005 10:25 PM dsv has not replied

Monk
Member (Idle past 3943 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 176 of 315 (239831)
09-01-2005 11:17 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by RAZD
09-01-2005 11:08 PM


Re: Not just the coast
of course, then we moved to "tornado alley"
Yea, so did I. I traded hurricanes for tornados, ah well.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by RAZD, posted 09-01-2005 11:08 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by RAZD, posted 09-01-2005 11:26 PM Monk has replied

Thor
Member (Idle past 5929 days)
Posts: 148
From: Sydney, Australia
Joined: 12-20-2004


Message 177 of 315 (239832)
09-01-2005 11:19 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by randman
09-01-2005 10:26 PM


Re: Louisiana without clout
marines with amphibious vehicles
Agreed, but they have to get them into the area, and they are big and heavy and not real fast. I think the major marine bases with large numbers of amtracks are on the east & west coasts near the major naval bases (and then one wonders how many of them are being used in Iraq). But I guess it goes back to the planning issue. Having some amtrack units based near major population centres during hurricane season would have been a good piece of forward thinking. Maybe something to think about for future planning.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by randman, posted 09-01-2005 10:26 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by randman, posted 09-01-2005 11:27 PM Thor has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 178 of 315 (239833)
09-01-2005 11:26 PM
Reply to: Message 176 by Monk
09-01-2005 11:17 PM


Re: Not just the coast
at least you have time to evacuate from hurricanes. we were hardly there a week and had to run from the (rented mobile home) to the shelter ... it knocked down trees in the neighboring town, not a long walk away.
now on the east coast, all I have to worry about is nor'easters.
Do you have any word of Pascagoula? I haven't heard any, and with Ingalls there ...
This message has been edited by RAZD, 09*01*2005 11:26 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by Monk, posted 09-01-2005 11:17 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by Monk, posted 09-01-2005 11:34 PM RAZD has replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4917 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 179 of 315 (239834)
09-01-2005 11:27 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by Thor
09-01-2005 11:19 PM


Re: Louisiana without clout
Yea, I mean what the heck is the department of Homeland Security for? Everyone has been talking about the Big One in New Orleans, and talking about nuke and other attacks on US cities as well.
We should have some major military mobile emergency response nearby every major metropolitan city in the nation.
Obviously they don't.
It's pretty much just as we feared. The Homeland Security, a misguided political response to 911 imo, is harming us.
The hurricane was the first major test of FEMA since it became part of the Homeland Security Department, a massive new bureaucracy that many feared would make the well-respected FEMA another sluggish federal agency.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050901/D8CBNMA88.html
FEMA was still functioning well a year ago.
What we need to do is eliminate the department of Homeland Security, get rid of the beaurocrats, and return federal agencies like FEMA to working order again.
What happened here is atrocious, and the government has let these poor people down.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by Thor, posted 09-01-2005 11:19 PM Thor has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 182 by Nuggin, posted 09-02-2005 12:56 AM randman has not replied

Monk
Member (Idle past 3943 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 180 of 315 (239838)
09-01-2005 11:34 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by RAZD
09-01-2005 11:26 PM


Re: Not just the coast
Do you have any word of Pascagoula? I haven't heard any, and with Ingalls there ...
No, I haven't heard about that area, but its only about 25 miles east of Biloxi. That can't be good.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by RAZD, posted 09-01-2005 11:26 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by RAZD, posted 09-02-2005 6:56 PM Monk has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024