The egg came first

With very few exceptions (and I think non in the animals) there is no time when an animal will give birth to something that isn't the same species as it is.This is just one example of how very,very little you know about evolution. I suggest that you stop now and read a very simple introductory text or spend a lot of time browsing this site and others give in links here. You can not say one way or the other is evolution is flawed if you knowledge of it is flawed. Believe me, you knowledge is very very flawed. In fact it is about as bad as anyone else who has ever dropped in here -- and boy! is that saying something.Each sentence you have is totally off base since it is from an idea of evolution that is utterly WRONG. What you are arguing against isn't something which exists. It is, possible, some nonsense you have read from a creationist site that knows NOTHING of the topic.This message has been edited by NosyNed, 09-14-2005 01:47 AM

The first half of your post, bk, is because the various posts aren't always exactly clear about separating species and individuals.A species can give rise to another species but an individual always** gives birth to an individual of the same species as the parent.**always isn't exactly true but in this context it is close enough.So no red jungle fowl ever gives birth to a chicken but a red jungle fowl population eventually produced a chicken population.Have I helped at all?