Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Board Administration ⇒ Suggestions and Questions ⇒

General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consecution

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consecution
tsig
Member (Idle past 2929 days)
Posts: 738
From: USA
Joined: 04-09-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 155 of 300 (243143)
09-13-2005 9:48 PM 		Reply to: Message 153 by jar
09-13-2005 8:26 PM

On topic re; moderation proedures
Might I suggest that when a poster starts a topic with another posters reply , that they be given a notice.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by jar, posted 09-13-2005 8:26 PM jar has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by jar, posted 09-13-2005 9:53 PM tsig has not replied
tsig
Member (Idle past 2929 days)
Posts: 738
From: USA
Joined: 04-09-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 159 of 300 (243465)
09-14-2005 6:48 PM 		Reply to: Message 158 by jar
09-14-2005 3:11 PM

Re: I met your demand, please acknowledge it
I have supported maintaining posting privileges for you simply because I believe it is important that everyone understand that there are people such as yourself that are incapable of reasoned thinking. I will continue to support your ability to post here.
​
Jar, there are many other sites to witness Faith-based behavior.
​
Every thread Faith is in becomes about Faith.
​
I feel there is much unrest in the ranks about the uneven playing field.
​
If there were a poll I think you know how I'd vote.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by jar, posted 09-14-2005 3:11 PM jar has not replied
tsig
Member (Idle past 2929 days)
Posts: 738
From: USA
Joined: 04-09-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 168 of 300 (243574)
09-14-2005 10:37 PM 		Reply to: Message 164 by jar
09-14-2005 7:32 PM

Favoitism
Folk have bent over backwards to grant you special consideration. Stop whining
​
No, you, Jar have changed the rules to give Faith special consideration.
​
How can you moderate when you admit you favor some over others?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by jar, posted 09-14-2005 7:32 PM jar has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 169 by Faith, posted 09-14-2005 11:03 PM tsig has replied
 Message 189 by Phat, posted 10-10-2005 10:05 AM tsig has not replied
tsig
Member (Idle past 2929 days)
Posts: 738
From: USA
Joined: 04-09-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 170 of 300 (243600)
09-14-2005 11:43 PM 		Reply to: Message 169 by Faith
09-14-2005 11:03 PM

Re: Favoritism?
Sigh. I don't buy this whole idea myself. I'm more aware of being summarily suspended from forums without warning, and from the site itself from time to time, a couple times when I knew it was coming, than I am of any favoritism
​
The "poor little me syndrome"
This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by Faith, posted 09-14-2005 11:03 PM Faith has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by Nuggin, posted 09-14-2005 11:48 PM tsig has not replied
 Message 182 by iano, posted 10-07-2005 11:22 AM tsig has replied
tsig
Member (Idle past 2929 days)
Posts: 738
From: USA
Joined: 04-09-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 185 of 300 (249938)
10-07-2005 10:43 PM 		Reply to: Message 182 by iano
10-07-2005 11:22 AM

Brevity is the soul of wit*
Had a quick scan of your last 20 posts DHR. Your average musing per post on this basis is 1.85 lines of text. It is not surprising thus that you provide no evidence to back up this assertion.
​
You may not agree with Faith but at least she puts some effort into making her case.
​
Like, it's the easiest thing to sit on the fence and throw rocks...
​
Just not all that admirable...
​
It's not the length of the text, but the content of the text. Did you read them to see if they fit into the context of the discussion?
​
I don't see any sylistic requirements in the EvC forum guideline.
​
I am not here for your admiration or any other form of approval.
​
If you had felt that I had made an assertion you should have asked me to provide evidence,or you could have picked out one of those comments and replied, instead you attack my posting history.
​
*not my quote
This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by iano, posted 10-07-2005 11:22 AM iano has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024