Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Attn IDers, what would it take...?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Attn IDers, what would it take...?
Phat
Member
Posts: 18299
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1

Normal Thread Display
Message 5 of 86 (243679)
09-15-2005 3:38 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Nuggin
09-15-2005 2:59 AM

"Exactly what would it take to convince an IDer of ToE?"
​
I dunno...I've never had a problem believing in a literal God and His literal Son Jesus Christ without necessarily embracing literal word for word Bible. My belief is not majority consensus in the churches I have attended, however. A sister question to this would be:
​
What would it take to convince traditional geologists/biologists/archeologists that I.D. is valid science?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Nuggin, posted 09-15-2005 2:59 AM Nuggin has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Parasomnium, posted 09-15-2005 4:04 AM Phat has not replied
  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18299
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1

Normal Thread Display
Message 8 of 86 (243684)
09-15-2005 4:13 AM 		Reply to: Message 7 by arachnophilia
09-15-2005 4:09 AM

Re: Two questions, two answers.
Additionally, if an evolutionist saw an angelic appearance or a distinct demonstration of a supernatural event..with a friend, perhaps to corroborate...science would be un-necessary to prove God from that point. They might well remain evolutionists, however. I think that I.D. is a house of cards verified by other I.D.ers with impressive resumes. It is a belief in a faith that has been embraced before the evidence was found. Evidence was then "explained" to legitimize it.
​
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 09-15-2005 02:15 AM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by arachnophilia, posted 09-15-2005 4:09 AM arachnophilia has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by arachnophilia, posted 09-15-2005 4:46 AM Phat has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024