Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,479 Year: 3,736/9,624 Month: 607/974 Week: 220/276 Day: 60/34 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   YEC approaches to empirical investigation
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3933 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 231 of 303 (243894)
09-15-2005 4:46 PM
Reply to: Message 230 by PurpleYouko
09-15-2005 4:19 PM


Re: Fact versus interpretation/theory
I think what Faith is suggesting though, is that the upwelling of magma is exerting a hydraulic pressure that is actively pushing the plates apart. If this were possible then it would tend to explain the way she sees things.
I'll explain in brief here but you can also go to the other thread to see more. That seems like a good idea until you learn why the magma is coming up. It is not just welling up on its own, it is welling up because the rifting creates cracks in the crust allowing it to rise.
This might be confusing to some who think of the "classical" style of volcanoe like the ones on the ring of fire (e.g. Mt. St. Helens). These volcanoes are created by magma that is rising up because it is hot enough to rise through the crust.
There are two ways to make liquid or air expand right. One is to heat it, the other is to decrease the pressure. The volcanoes at the ridges are due to the latter. Hope that makes sense.

No smoking signs by gas stations. No religion in the public square. The government should keep us from being engulfed in flames on earth, and that is pretty much it. -- Jon Stewart, The Daily Show

This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by PurpleYouko, posted 09-15-2005 4:19 PM PurpleYouko has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 232 by Faith, posted 09-15-2005 5:13 PM Jazzns has replied

Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3933 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 233 of 303 (243909)
09-15-2005 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 232 by Faith
09-15-2005 5:13 PM


Re: Fact versus interpretation/theory
Hi Faith,
Did you read my response to you over in the links and information thread? That post had much more detail.
I do not see that WHY it is rising up makes any difference at all.
The why is extremely important. At a rift all the magma is doing is filling up the space created by the rift. It is not pushing on anything. The only reason it rises is because room was made for it to rise.
On the opposite side of things, Mt. St. Helens for example, the magma there rose because it was heated. That DOES displace crust causing all kinds of neat things like intrusions and metamorphism.
It is still the rising up and spreading out of this magma that is pushing the plates -- basically by creating more sea floor. No matter how you look at it, the action that is moving the continents originates with the spreading magma, and this is a PUSHING action.
No it is not. It is not pushing the plates at all. If it could push the plate then magma at any random spot under the ocean crust could do it. The only reason the magma rises is becuase of the rifting due to the plates moving apart.
The key here is that magma does not spontaneously rise to the surface any more than air or a liquid will spontaneously expand. It either has to be heated or the pressure exerted on it by the crust has to be lightened.
Magma that is heated does push its way through the crust but it dosen't do it the way we see it happening at divergent boundaries. The ring of fire has all kinds of volcanoes all due to magma that rose to the surface but they are in no way breaking the plate up and pushing it anywhere. Magma is a liquid so like a liquid it will follow the path of least resistance which is up not sideways.
Again, HOW or WHY it is expanding does not change the fact that it is exerting a PUSHING action on the continental mass by the simple fact that it IS expanding and creating new sea floor.
First off when magma cools it contracts. Second, you don't get to make up your own facts. The observation at a divergent boundary is that magma rises due to rifting not the other way around. That is the observation.
It doesn't matter if it exploded out of the ridge or rises up because of the rift itself. As long as it is rising and creating new sea floor and pushing older magma ahead of it,
Bingo! That is where you are backwards. Look at the bolded section. The magma at a divergent boundary does not push older magma or rock out of the way. It rises because there is a hole to fill. There is space. All it is pushing is water or air. This IS the observation. This IS the fact.
it is this pushing action that is also moving the continents.
The only thing being pushed at a divergent boundary is the empty space created by the rifting.
The plates might be moving because the theorized convection cells are "pushing" it but none of that is observation. Regardless of what theorized force is moving the plates they are RIFTING at the boundary. Empty spaces are being created, rift valleys are dropping out, and normal faults are forming. All of can't occur with a pushing action. Pushing fills in holes, uplifts land, and creates reverse faults.
I am not feeding you any bullshit here. This is what we observe. If you don't believe me then check out those links I posted, search for some more, or ask me to provide more resources for you.

No smoking signs by gas stations. No religion in the public square. The government should keep us from being engulfed in flames on earth, and that is pretty much it. -- Jon Stewart, The Daily Show

This message is a reply to:
 Message 232 by Faith, posted 09-15-2005 5:13 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 234 by Faith, posted 09-15-2005 6:32 PM Jazzns has replied
 Message 235 by Faith, posted 09-15-2005 6:50 PM Jazzns has not replied

Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3933 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 236 of 303 (243923)
09-15-2005 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 234 by Faith
09-15-2005 6:32 PM


Re: Fact versus interpretation/theory
Jazz, I already said those links were too much to ask me to read. YOu need to to do a better job of explaining in your own words.
Once again, did you read my last post in the Links thread? Please answer. Anyway, the links are there for you to follow up on in case you think I am just pulling this out of thin air.
On the positive side. There are lots of good questions here.
So what's causing the rift that the magma is filling?
The rift is caused by the plate moving apart. We do not know why the plates are moving apart. We just know that they ARE moving apart. That is an observation.
WHat's causing the movement of the plates?
No one knows. We cannot observe the mechanics of the mantle. The leading theory is the convection cell theory which says that plates are similar to big conveyer belts of material and move around.
What we do know is that, in the example of the mid atlantic ridge, is that the two plates are moving apart, splitting the crust, creating rifts. That is it. That is the observation. The cause of the movement of the plates is unknown except via theory.
The illustrations do NOT show a rift being filled. They show magma rising up and pushing cooler magma away from the ridge. That's what they SHOW.
I can see where there is some confusion. You are coming from the perspective of wanting it to be that way and thus the animations certainly look like the magma that is coming up is pushing the rocks aside. But think about this critically for a moment. If magma, being a liquid, is rising up to the surface and it has the choice to displace a rock laterally or displacing nothing by moving vertically what do yout think is going to happen? Because it is a liquid it will take the path of least resistance and go up into the empty space above it rather than the filled space to the sides.
If you want to focus your case on a gif animation then first of all realize that it is just a darned gif. Second, think of it in the context of the other information that you know. Magma is prevented from coming to the surface by the crust. When you remove crust the magma will come up. Now look at that animation as if the plates are moving first and THEN the magma fills up into the space. Supplement your knowledge not just based on this one picture but also the text of the sources that explain that picture just how I am explaining it to you here.
There is no need to repeat the distinction from volcanic action. That was never the point and it makes NO difference.
It is very pertinent to the discussion or I would not have said it. One of the primary observations that makes a divergent boundary different from a convergent boundary is the type of volcanism that happens there. IT is one of the observations. We don't want to ignore facts now do we?
I have NO idea what this means. You are not being clear. WHAT "empty spaces?"
A rift is a hole. A hole is an empty space. Before the hole is made there is no way for the magma underneath the crust to come up like it wants to. When a rift is made there is now an empty space. Now the magma can come up and fill that empty space. That is the point I am trying to show you. The magma comes up not because it is pushing on the crust. The magma comes up because the crust moved out of its way. It works the opposite way at a convergent boundary.
What is creating the empty spaces?
Take a cloth and pull on it from two opposite sides. If you pull hard enough you will make it rip at some point in the middle. You have just created an empty space in the cloth. The empty spaces in the crust are created by one plate moving in on direction, another plate moving in the opposite direction. At some point something has to give. What gives is called a rift.
What is a "rift valley" and what does it mean that they are "dropping out?"
Think of a normal valley but instead of a river carving it or something it is created by the land falling at a fault. This should be one of the key points for you because you already know that if it were being compressed that it would be pushing things up like those hills we are trying to describe. This is the opposite of that and is the opposite action that creates it. Pushing makes hills, pulling and rifting makes valleys.
Are you saying that the plates are moving and as they move the previously extruded magma moves with them and that leaves space that is filled by new magma?
Yea. The magma comes up to fill the empty spaces. Then it hardens joining the two plates again. The plates rift more spliting that newly formed rock and more magma comes up to fill the gap.
How odd that the new magma doesn't just pile up on top of the old.
How can it? It won't get past old magma unless the plates cause another rift. Remember, the only reason it is rising is because room was made for it to rise. Once that room is take up again it stops until more room is made by another rift.
How come the rate of movement is precisely right for creating this apparently continuous new sea floor?
It has nothing to do with any rates. The magma wants to come up but the crust stops it. Make a hole in the crust and the magma will come up. You can do this at any pace.
It matters where the movement originates. If not the continental ridge, then where?
Unknown. How the plates move is currently explained by convection cell theory. We cannot see into the mantle AFAIK.
Clearly it doesn't originate in the Pacific trenches. Those are explained as collisions of plates in which one dives under the other -- a movement toward one another.
We cannot say clearly because we do not know. The plate is moving due to some mechanism. The leading theory it is moving due to convection in the mantle meaning that it isn't being pulled or pushed on either "end" of the plate.
It is at the Atlantic ridge that there is this divergent action, and this has to be the driving force that moves the continents.
No it dosen't have to be the driving force. Certainly not just because you say so. IN fact we specifically know it is not the driving force which is the point of this whole discussion.
The best way to simplify this I think is simply that what is happening at a divergent boundary is a weakening of the crust. That is why normal faults occur. That is why the land sinks. That is why the land break apart (rifts). The crust is letting its guard down which is why the magma CAN rise to the surface. It is a passive reaction. These are the things we observe. Period.
This message has been edited by Jazzns, 09-15-2005 05:43 PM

No smoking signs by gas stations. No religion in the public square. The government should keep us from being engulfed in flames on earth, and that is pretty much it. -- Jon Stewart, The Daily Show

This message is a reply to:
 Message 234 by Faith, posted 09-15-2005 6:32 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by Faith, posted 09-15-2005 9:39 PM Jazzns has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024