Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,821 Year: 3,078/9,624 Month: 923/1,588 Week: 106/223 Day: 4/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Discovery Institute's "400 Scientist" Questionaire
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1399 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 8 of 22 (244456)
09-17-2005 7:45 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by RAZD
09-17-2005 1:51 PM


Re: one question
Wow, it's nice to have one question, but you've basically conflated four quesiton in one by making the answers REALLY complex. How about this:
Do you think this statement:
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged"
(1) {Yes No}: Is a normal statement of scientific skepticism
(2) {Yes No}: Is similar to statements that can be made about any scientific theory
(3) {Yes No}: Is critical of some aspects of evolutionary theory more than other sciences
(4) {Yes No}: Promotes Intelligent Design as a valid alternative
This message has been edited by Ben, Saturday, 2005/09/17 04:47 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by RAZD, posted 09-17-2005 1:51 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by RAZD, posted 09-17-2005 8:15 PM Ben! has not replied
 Message 11 by arachnophilia, posted 09-19-2005 12:03 AM Ben! has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024