Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 46/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   First Gay marriage, then Polygamy (its happening!)
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1431 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 3 of 94 (248147)
10-02-2005 10:15 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Silent H
10-02-2005 8:38 AM


Heh. Better tell Pat Robertson ...
This is where I say (again, have said, etc) that "marriage" should be a religious issue and defined by the church(es) in question. That secular society, especially government institutions, should not have any laws based on this concept as it discriminates for no secular purpose.
The mormon fundies should be happy with this eh? As should the Muslim, and Jewish traditions that have multiple wives.
Slippery slope?
Not unless you can suddenly contract between adults and children of minor age or animals ...
And then we also get into the non compos mentis issue eh?
There is nothing wrong with contracts between consenting adults.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Silent H, posted 10-02-2005 8:38 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by nator, posted 10-02-2005 10:24 AM RAZD has not replied
 Message 7 by Silent H, posted 10-02-2005 1:22 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1431 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 11 of 94 (248214)
10-02-2005 2:29 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Silent H
10-02-2005 1:22 PM


The idea that children are the equivalent of animals or the insane,
I didn't necessitate equivalence, these were just other "examples" from the extremists of the slippery slope issue.
The interesting issue is that using a contract issue as the basis that kids can be better protected (but not necessarily -- parents used to sell kids into slavery, so approving a contract where the parents benefit while the child loses would not be much better).
Of course there have also been wills where the entire estate has been left to some pet or other, and the legal difference between this and a {contract partnership} with legal inheritance is pretty minor.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Silent H, posted 10-02-2005 1:22 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Silent H, posted 10-02-2005 3:25 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1431 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 17 of 94 (248254)
10-02-2005 3:43 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Nuggin
10-02-2005 2:21 PM


Re: Cause and Effect?
Polygamy has as much (or more) in common with straight marriage than gay marriage.
Your assumptions are showing. They could be {bisexual-in-the middle\group-sexual}, just because a minimum of (one) het coupling is required doesn't mean that it is the rule.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Nuggin, posted 10-02-2005 2:21 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Nuggin, posted 10-02-2005 10:22 PM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1431 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 18 of 94 (248255)
10-02-2005 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Silent H
10-02-2005 3:25 PM


the fact that liberals are generally against child rights for sex or marriage, yet feel they are competent and should have sole discretion with regard to birth control and abortion. So sex and relationships no, but consequences of such things... yes.
heh
That's because we want them to complete a liberal education before settling down to a job

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Silent H, posted 10-02-2005 3:25 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024