|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,483 Year: 3,740/9,624 Month: 611/974 Week: 224/276 Day: 0/64 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
dogmai Guest |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: We are the gods.. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
John Inactive Member |
Hi TJ! I missed ya man.
quote: But is it true? Secondly, I don't think the ToE removes any moral responsibility. Morality and ethics are practical, functional, social constructs. Religion coops these for itself but doesn't create them.
quote: That isn't the point. I wouldn't argue against this. What I would argue is that "God's Laws" are so fuzzy as codified in the Bible that virtually any activity can be justified wholeheartedly. And this is precisely what has been done throughout history. And this is why we have ~600 denominations of Christianity, not all of them compatible despite the gloss to the contrary.
quote: I'm not talking about individuals exclusively but about groups as well.
quote: Why do you think SCIENTISTS are going to become the supreme authority?
quote: Bet you don't have breeches on your piano legs eh?
quote: So now you fear an armed revolt of amoral scientists?
quote: But you do.
quote: Sure, but not a majority. There are plenty of people around now who feel that way. We put them in prison.
quote: Nope.
quote: And we have christians who want to ship minorities back to there native countries or worse. You miss the point that not all people believe that these extremes of behavior are correct.
quote: To whom must it make sense now? You are behaving as if ALL safeguards are religious. That simply isn't the case. In fact, most are not religious. Not much would change if you eliminate God.
quote: That depends on who the action effects, just like it works right now.
quote: No they can't. Just look at the creationist's arguments. LOL.
quote: Just like some do now.
quote: A sin, no, but that doesn't mean I approve. Some of us have values derived from careful consideration instead of "a book told me so"
quote: You desperately need to do some cross-cultural comparisons.
quote: But you tag his name to cultural norms codified thousands of years ago.
quote: I ask for evidence.
quote: I am arguing that this condition of no absolute morality is precisely the condition we've lived in all along.
quote: Faith based morality is not hollow? "A book says so....." is not hollow? "I can't prove it, but I believe it" is not hollow?
quote: Dunno. And I am not arrogant enough to make pronouncements about it.
quote: Dunno. Sickle cell sometimes pays off.
quote: LOL. Throwing rocks in a glass house my friend.
quote: That is exactly how evolution works TJ. The people who survive to reproduce are the ones who pass along the genes. Evolution isn't a thing that cares about the conditions of the survivors or about the possible future consequences if malaria wasn't a factor or if the populations moved. Selections works NOW. If selection causes an organism to adapt to an environment which then vanishes, that organism may die out. Its adaptations may not be suitable for the new environment.
quote: What kind of logic, TJ, dead on target logic?
quote: Circumcision isn't a medical practice. It is a cultural ritual like scarification.
quote: Can't imprison them for something that is not currently illegal, but the practise ought to be outlawed.
quote: Your reaction would have some bite if circumcision were a medical practice instead of an ancient tribal ritual. It does no good. Setting a broken bone, while painful, actually does do some good.
quote: Now you are really flying off on a tangent.
quote: No it hasn't. Your scenario is crap. It doesn't happen.
quote: Circumcision Information and Resource Pages Read it and weep. I trust you will.
quote: I said they got it from the Egyptians, not that they were enslaved by the Egyptians. The Isrealites were once indistiguishable from the Babylonians and lived in Egypt under the name Hyksos.
quote: Yeah, probably, unless I look at the archeological data. [qutoe]The Bible says God instructed them to circumcise their males.[/quote] So the myth goes.... it isn't supported by the data we have.
quote: LOL. I have data and you don't.
quote: I believe you asked me if I knew of a culture that supported inflicting pain on babies. This qualifies. Throwing around the idea of torture is misleading.
quote: Yeah, no kidding.
quote: Well, TJ, if one culture dissents it isn't absolute.
quote: That's a bit twisted in itself. She is punished, in effect, for being raped. She marries her rapists or doesn't marry. Pretty vicious.
quote: Right. What was that about moral relativity?
quote: Yet you defend the behavior? [qutoe]However, even in arranged marriages, it had nothing to do with the woman's desires. That was just the way it happened.[/quote] LOL.... glad to see that a world based on God's laws is so appealing.
quote: Surely god knew that this was a wrong decision. Why then wasn't Lot punished? God was quick to punish back in the good old days.
quote: hmm...... give my daughter up to be gang raped? gee.... I wonder what I should do?
quote: Strangely, you seem to going just that direction, even after arguing the opposite earlier in the post.
quote: God sure threatened it. Isaiah 13:16. And... 2 Samuel 12:11 which threat was carried out in 2 Samuel 16:22 by David's own son Absalom. There are many tales of conquest and kidnapping as well, most of which God lets slide, thereby showing approval.
quote: Yup. Pay the dad and marry the victim.
quote: And whomever convinces the people that he has the ear of God gets to order the massacres. This is precisely what I have been saying.
quote: Absolutely. I think slaves are quite valuable.
quote: Like hell. Maybe you should review the rules governing such things.
quote: Applicable only to fellow Isrealites, by the way.
quote: Right.
quote: Niether.
quote: Do you think I haven't checked these claims? Precious little has ever been validated. Pull your head out of the sand.
quote: Anything that might hold clues to the past is valuable to archeologists. That is a long way from saying it is accurate.
quote: You haven't veriefied it yet? Very sneaky.
quote: Its in another thread.
EvC Forum: Luke and Matthews geneologies quote: Deuteronomy 7:2, 20:13, 20:16 Please, TJ, its just painful to watch the denial.
quote: Right. They weren't Isrealites and didn't worship him. Oldest excuse in the book.
quote: I guess Allah was judging us on the Sept. 11. Or maybe it was God who wasn't happy with us? ------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
John Inactive Member |
quote: Yes indeed, or perhaps just foolish.
quote: Oops... you seemed to have missed a large and very relevant bit. Let me refresh your memory.
Morality and ethics are practical, functional, social constructs. Thus your claim that evolution removes morality is false. None of the practical social functions are lost if one assumes evolution. You assume that morality comes from some divine source. It doesn't
quote: I have this thing about believing what is true.
quote: hmmm.... you flip a coin and get heads. So you accept that you flipped a coin and got heads. Where is the 'absolute moral value?' It seems you are just quibbling.
quote: No, it isn't very interesting. Things fall down so I accept it as true. If I did not I may be tempted to jump off a building in order to fall upward to the next floor. Where is the value judgement in that? BTW, what are you typing to get those weird character strings? Your post are riddled with things like this: ’t.
quote: I don't have to prove that God doesn't exist, you have to prove that he does. You or I can prove anything by claiming that something is true until proven false. Proof requires evidence, and only things that exist produce evidence. Thus, technically, no proof is possible for things that don't exist. This is why people try to prove EXISTENCE not non-existence. The latter is an exercise in futility.
quote: My opinion is based upon things we know, maybe it is wrong. Yours is based upon something for which we have no evidence-- God. There is a big difference.
quote: ... not a very good example.
quote: You are arguing that fact should be subservient to belief or to human emotional need. Sorry, but it doesn't work that way. This is just practical knowlegde. I can believe that I am invulnerable but that won't stop a bullet from cracking my skull.
quote: So principles that are written in plain language are acceptable? All of them, or only some? Is the NT more important than the OT? If your claim were true there would not be six hundred extant versions of Christianity and who knows how many extinct sects.
quote: Really? Name something and I bet a case can be made, if it hasn't already.
quote: Then your ignorance of history is profound. Sorry to be so blunt. Take a look at the history of the RCC. Or of the churches in the Southern States pre-civil war. Or of the destruction of the native americans by the spanish.
quote: ok, good so far...
quote: Not really... I wish this were more true than it is.
[quote][b]but if scientists can persuade the educational community that it is right[quote][b] You are glossing over the possibility that scientists actually come up with good answers. You word this as if science is a propaganda machine out to convince people that its views are right. This isn't the case. Do you criticise science? The basic methods of science, I mean? Do you have a problem with looking at evidence and drawing conclusions?
quote: What opinion would be more appropriate? The conclusions of science are the most analyzed and criticised conclusion in the history of humanity. What more do you want? Oh, you want your un-critical belief.
quote: What? You mean there is a problem with the average person believing what is shown to be true repeatedly for decades?
quote: All you have to do is provide evidence for a designer and you are in like Flynn. There isn't any such evidence. ID has evidence of the caliber presented when defending spoon-bending and astrology. That is, it has laughable evidence.
quote: It fact, your fear of information and knowledge is quite amusing.
quote: Perhaps, but science does not force this scenario. You are just paranoid.
quote: I could find dozens of examples of religion devaluing human life. I think Christianity as it exists today is one of the worst in this respect. The OT is full of such things and you'd be blind not to see it. The point being that science or evolution can't be blamed for this type of behavior. Humans have been at it for millenia.
quote: Whoa.... animal rights movement?????????
quote: Honestly, I don't fear what you fear. And that is kinda what I have been trying to point out. Feel free to make a case for or against something, but basically it looks like your argument is that you are afraid so we shouldn't do 'stuff.' Forgive me if I don't jump to attention.
quote: Most probably do want their research to be unregulated. But ask a slightly different question. Ask if they feel that ALL research should be unregulated. A scientist may be irritated that his/her work on the black plague is hampered by governmental regulation, but I doubt you'd find many scientist who'd say those regulations should be abolished. You are reaching too far if you want to make that claim.
quote: Not so. I deal with regulations that I consider restrictive, but grudgingly admit the utility and necessity of those regulations.
quote: When has science ever been unfettered, that you can make this claim to historical knowledge? Secondly, you are continually glosing over the fact that people can think and act responsibily outside of your, or any, religious paradigm.
quote: Peculiar that people pushing belief systems with no evidential base 'need accountability.'
quote: Paranoia..... I haven't made this argument.
quote: Of course it is.
quote: Everything I say is my opinion. That should be obvious. Shall I post this non-answer in response to your assertions? The point being... that some people are mean and nasty? Yeah, no kidding.
quote: Could be because people use quack science to criticise the ToE. Good evidence will be accepted. Trash won't be. The problem for creationism is that it is trash in the worst way. I have yet to see one good argument. Life would be more interesting if creationists had good arguments, but they don't and the longer I post here the more convinced I become of that.
quote: uh-huh.... When? Where? Who? Back it up or you're just spreading rumors.
quote: The exact statistic I could not find, but what is interesting is that I could not find ONE racist organization that is athiestic. All have religious affiliations/agendas.
quote: Cross culturally people behave pretty much the same. Different gods, different ritual, different environments but all people behave pretty much the same. Some have no Gods, but we still get the same basic moral patterns. Even chimps show those patterns of behavior. You are just blowing smoke. You need a good education in anthropology.
quote: Actually, I do believe that.
quote: Only the ones with whom I am familiar. Probably this foolishness does not extend into all areas. Creationists are selectively blind is the nice way to put it.
quote: No I am not. Aristotle declared that the sun orbits the earth and he did so based on very good logic for the time. He couldn't detect the minute angles that we can detect today. The rules change as knowledge increases.
quote: Doesn't matter. There are no good creationist arguments. The same trash is repeated over and over again. Besides, there are far more intelligent people who are scientists who are not creationists. How do I know this? Because the consensus of science is nowhere near even considering creationism as a valid option.
quote: Woefully ignorant? Try me. Point out one good creationist theory. Point out just one that is not full of holes and contradictions.
quote: Why then do the same laws recur worldwide rather than just in the law-books of God's chosen? That is what one would expect if God gave moral law to a people as is claimed in the OT.
quote: Then I can keep slaves so long as they are not Isrealites? And I can pillage my neighbors and take young girls for concubines? And throw them away if I don't like the merchandise? Come on. How can you be so obtuse?
quote: There probably are reasons, though not always the cherry-on-top reasons the religious push.
quote: hmmmm..... I can study culture and behavior. There is no evidence for God. So a morality, or a theory of morality mor properly, based on something for which we have no evidence is on a stronger foundation that a morality that is based on evidence? LOL.....
quote: Really? Willful ignorance is not attractive. [qutoe]People's opinions do not determine morality according to the Bible and that is my basis for my belief as well as what my heart(conscience) tells me.[/quote] Nor does the Bible determine your morality, since the Bible doesn't give a damn about rape unless God's chosen are the victims. Don't be a hypocrit.
quote: Hmmm... well anyone can say this same thing with equal conviction. Buddhist, Hindu, Voodoo..... So what does it matter? It is hollow. Until you have evidence for this creator all you have is a fairy tale.
quote: Yes, you said it. Forgive me for doubting. This has been covered above.
quote: ummmm..... ok. Are you now agreeing to go with the best supported theory?
quote: And again your world view is based on a critter no one has ever seen.
quote: So demonstrate that it is true.
quote: No. My phrasing is correct. We have a book. It claims to be the word of God, but any book can claim that. There is no evidence that it is anything but a book.
quote: Is that what we are doing? Then I win. YOU HAVE NO EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AT ALL.
quote: Glad to have you on the team.
quote: Typical response intended to discredit my arguments by casting doubt on my motivations and character. This is fallacious.
quote: No there isn't. If your view turns out to be true, I change my mind. Problem solved. Can you say the same?
quote: Living inside the lie as you do, you cannot see the vaste damage that it does and has done for ages. This is what you would have to face, should you ever open your eyes.
quote: Like hell!!! It the first thing people do. Just look around you. Most of the world 'bows to a creator.' How is it that this goes against every bone in our bodies? The fact is that appealling to daddy is the easy way out. God is easier than taking responsibility.
quote: Another typical subtly derogatory religious comment.
quote: No, it isn't, not by a lot. You seem to desperately want to believe that but it isn't true.
quote: Perhaps? So what? I wasn't talking about curing disease, but about eugenics. Genetic manipulation of my cells to cure a cancer is not the same as cutting out a slice of DNA. The latter could have dire unforseen consequences.
quote: I claim there is no evidence for God, just like there is no evidence for Zeus, Ra, or spider-man. The way you feel about Zeus and Ra? Chances are, that is how I feel about your god.
quote: This is just silly. In areas where malaria is rampant, sickle cell is more benificial than harmful. Your misunderstanding of the dynamics is blatantly obvious.
quote: A mutation that provides a net increase in an individual's chances to reproduce, given the environmental factors, is a bad example of evolution?
quote: Downward? From what? From perfect forms that no one has ever seen, and for which there is no evidence? Come on TJ.
quote: You present no argument, just incredulity.
quote: You've made this part up. Lot choose that land because it was very fertile.
quote: I'm sorry. LOT'S PUNISHMENT IS TO HAVE HIS DAUGHTERS RAPED? Are you insane man? Is your mind truly that twisted and desperate to hang onto your myth?
quote: No. You have made this part up. Lot lost his stuff because God decided to tourch the city. He would have lost this whether the angels came to warn him or not, but Abraham convinced God that Lot should be spared, so you can't twist this into a type of punishment. Lot wasn't being punished. Lot is never included in the people who are to be punished. Lot is the one 'right and just' guy in the city.
quote: So you can make up what you feel has been left out? That isn't much of a holy book. You are exemplifying what I mentioned above-- that one can make whatever one wants out of the Bible.
quote: Peculiar then that God doesn't seem to mind.
quote: You've made this bit up. And given the misogyny of the ancient Isrealites, I kinda doubt it. Girls aren't real people.
quote: Much of what you argue is blatantly relativistic, though you don't see it.
quote: Rape and enslavement is fair punishment TJ? This, essentially, is what you are saying? So when we take Iraq the soldiers can bring back teenage trophies? Please.... this is absurd.
quote: If you have kids, is this a punishment you would feel comfortable allowing?
quote: BS. And you'd realize this if we were not talking about your religion.
quote: Depends on the sin... some things you claim to be wrong are not condemned in the Bible.
quote: Could be, but if he actually judged we'd straighten up right quick. Humans aren't that stupid, but God doesn't judge in any clear way. It requires convoluted theories to connect God to anything at all.
quote: Hey, I won't argue that there is a need for such judgement, but that does not make it so and this idea did not exist in the Isrealite worldview until long after the OT was written.
quote: But you are above that this isn't the case. Look way up at the beginning of this long post.
quote: The exceptions are continuous, one after the other, in history. How is this not 'the rule'?
quote: Actually, not. You have your numbers very wrong. Pretty much everyone throughout history has been religious, yet look at the havoc. And that is the point of this, that religion does not check this sort of thing as you claim it does.
No webpage found at provided URL: http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat0.htm quote: Your statement was that slavery then was different from slavery now. This is crap. It is true that Isrealite slaves had special rights, but non-Isrealite slaves were chattel. Period. Just read the rules in the OT and open your eyes. Pay attention. For example, it is not ok to beat a slave to death, but if the slaves lives for a day or two after the beating and then dies it is ok. Is this a better form of slavery? Hardly. Beating the slave to death outright is probably more humane.
quote: No, it couldn't be, but you aren't really interested in the answer. This is a patented religious response and really is designed to discredit.
quote: I have looked at your site. It makes a lot of claims and backs up none of them that I can tell. This is just the sort of Biblical archeology that gives the term a bad taste. Not the mention that this sort of willingness to use fuzzy logic reflects badly on christianity as a whole. If there is something particular you want to discuss, start a new thread and I'll join you.
quote: So, you don't bothe to check your sources? You just post whatever suits you?
quote: Still very painful to watch the denial. Living inside the lie, I am sure you are blind to this.
quote: LOL.... so killing idol worshippers is ok. Killing sinners in general is ok. LOL.......
quote: But God doesn't take it. People do. This is the problem. Until there is some convincing reason to believe in God, all you've got is people killing people and claiming divine rights to do it.
quote: Big deal. Look at the history of some other densly populated region. You'll see the same types of conquest and power-exchanges and find the same sorts of God-punished-somebody stories but with different Gods. Are this all true as well, because somebody says so?
quote: No it isn't interesting at all. It allows the Jews to pretend that they, rather there God, is in control the whole time. Simple.
quote: So you won't commit to the same opinions when the events are current as when they are thousands of years in the past. This should tell you something. ------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024