... you actually 'proved' something.
In the now closed thread, I had written:
"Never mind that he [Borger] has claimed - and been unable to support (because there IS NO support) - that conserved sequences in introns falsifies the neutral theory."
The cretinist in question responded with:
quote:
I say:
Wanna have proof? Take a subscribtion to JBC:
WBlanc V, Davidson NO. Related Articles, Books, LinkOut
C to U RNA editing: Mechanisms leading to genetic diversity.
J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 20 [epub ahead of print]
PMID: 12446660 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
The autors show that RNA editing requires intron-exon alignment and that implicates conserved regions in the intron. Case proven.
I ask the rational reader - Did the creationist prove that conserved sequence in introns - which I mentioned some time ago - falsifies the Neutral Theory with his citation?
Or was the creationist's response utterly irrelevant, as it seems to me?
[This message has been edited by SLPx, 11-30-2002]