Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,334 Year: 3,591/9,624 Month: 462/974 Week: 75/276 Day: 3/23 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Thou Shalts and Thou Shalnts
iano
Member (Idle past 1959 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 91 of 204 (252444)
10-17-2005 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by jar
10-17-2005 4:32 PM


Re: Blessing, not Condemnation
jar writes:
The same way you test any map, by how closely it correspondes to reality.
And therein lies the rub. The standard against which all is measured is a standard which has not been calibrated to indicate that it is a true standard against which to measure.
Putting a dead true straight-edge against a very imperfect, warped "straight"edge and declaring the dead straight to be warped is to be expected if the warped is considered true in the first place.
So which is the warped reality: ours or the bibles. And how does one figure this?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by jar, posted 10-17-2005 4:32 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by jar, posted 10-17-2005 4:52 PM iano has replied
 Message 100 by Legend, posted 10-18-2005 8:26 AM iano has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 92 of 204 (252445)
10-17-2005 4:52 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by iano
10-17-2005 4:44 PM


Re: Blessing, not Condemnation
So which is the warped reality: ours or the bibles.
That's easy enough. It will of course depend on the specifics.
For example, the Creation Myths are both mutually exclusive and do not correspond to reality. The Earth is more than 6000 years old.
GOD, if GOD exists is neither stupid nor vainglorious.
The Bible is but a human construct. It is neither GOD nor even a record written by GOD. The Universe is far more directly the hand of GOD and a record than any anthology could ever be.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by iano, posted 10-17-2005 4:44 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by iano, posted 10-17-2005 5:26 PM jar has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 430 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 93 of 204 (252448)
10-17-2005 4:54 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by iano
10-17-2005 4:06 PM


Re: Blessing, not Condemnation
iano writes:
Or can we at this point clear that up and decided simply that what is recorded is (for the purpose of this discussion) accurately recorded and examine it in that light ie: Jesus words are accurately recorded as are Pauls.
That's exactly what I've been saying: for the purpose of this discussion, you and I are both assuming that the Bible has been handed down to us, word-for-word, as if dictated by God Herself.
Romans 1-8 is an expostion of the workings of the Gospel. Very little in here has anything to do with the church in Rome specifically.
Nonetheless, that epistle was addressed to the church of Rome and deliverd to the church of Rome. It is a mistake to extrapolate what Paul said to the Romans, as if it was universally applicable. If you think what he said was universally applicable to all Christians, show us where he said the same things (i.e. about condemnation) in his other epistles.
Jesus said "Love God..." and "Love your neighbour... that's the commandments/Law in a nutshell".
Now hands up all those who follow these commandments.
In case you can't see it, my hand is up. Just over the horizon, I think I can see that jar's hand is up too. I see a lot of hands up.
No, we don't succeed in following those commandments 100% all the time. Show us in the Bible where it says we have to be 100% successful.
I don't know how to make it any plainer: Jesus said, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. On these two commandments hang ALL THE LAW and the prophets."
You have not addressed that point: ALL THE LAW. There is no need for any "explanation" by Paul. ALL THE LAW consists of loving God and loving thy neighbour. And nothing is said about a 100% success rate.
You can complain all you like about the idea of "trying" to keep the law, but you haven't shown where the Bible says anything else. Since the Bible makes it quite plain that we are not perfect, it stands to reason that perfection is not required of us.

People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by iano, posted 10-17-2005 4:06 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by iano, posted 10-18-2005 8:45 AM ringo has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1959 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 94 of 204 (252457)
10-17-2005 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by jar
10-17-2005 4:52 PM


Re: Blessing, not Condemnation
That's easy enough. It will of course depend on the specifics.
It sure will. But the question was how do we figure our reality is the straightedge?
For example, the Creation Myths are both mutually exclusive and do not correspond to reality. The Earth is more than 6000 years old.
The bible doesn't say the earth is 6000 years old. It can be read that way by some. But clear on this it is not (see EvCforum.net)
The Universe is far more directly the hand of GOD and a record than any anthology could ever be.
The Universe may tell us there is a God and he is something else. But it won't tell us a thing about salvation and how one gets it
Your wiggling Jar
What use the bible for anything if none of it is to be considered accurate?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by jar, posted 10-17-2005 4:52 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by jar, posted 10-17-2005 5:32 PM iano has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 95 of 204 (252460)
10-17-2005 5:32 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by iano
10-17-2005 5:26 PM


Re: Blessing, not Condemnation
What use the bible for anything if none of it is to be considered accurate?
It's a map, a guide.
But GOD never expected us to check our brains at the door.
When the map says the bridge is fine but we can see it's been washed away, it is foolish to simply drive across.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by iano, posted 10-17-2005 5:26 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by iano, posted 10-18-2005 5:20 AM jar has not replied
 Message 97 by iano, posted 10-18-2005 5:21 AM jar has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1959 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 96 of 204 (252617)
10-18-2005 5:20 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by jar
10-17-2005 5:32 PM


Re: Blessing, not Condemnation
edit to delete: double post
This message has been edited by iano, 18-Oct-2005 10:22 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by jar, posted 10-17-2005 5:32 PM jar has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1959 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 97 of 204 (252618)
10-18-2005 5:21 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by jar
10-17-2005 5:32 PM


Re: Blessing, not Condemnation
Another map reader blows himself and others up in an israeli disco. Why is his map reading ability (or reality standard) less correct than yours. He sees bridges down in a different way to you. Is his way as valid as yours?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by jar, posted 10-17-2005 5:32 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by jar, posted 10-18-2005 8:04 AM iano has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 98 of 204 (252651)
10-18-2005 8:04 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by iano
10-18-2005 5:21 AM


Re: Blessing, not Condemnation
Another map reader blows himself and others up in an israeli disco. Why is his map reading ability (or reality standard) less correct than yours.
What makes you think he's a map reader? It sounds far more like he is the typical Literalist and Fundamentalist.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by iano, posted 10-18-2005 5:21 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by iano, posted 10-18-2005 8:15 AM jar has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1959 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 99 of 204 (252659)
10-18-2005 8:15 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by jar
10-18-2005 8:04 AM


Re: Blessing, not Condemnation
"Sounds like" to you. And you "sound like" to him etc etc. Point being your approach is as subjective as his.
Without any firm mooring (even if only assumed for the sake of discussion) then discussion is impossible due to "that bit isn't true and this bit is" being totally arbitary and personal - measured against what ever reality happens to be in force today
Not much fun in that so.... see you around Jar

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by jar, posted 10-18-2005 8:04 AM jar has not replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5024 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 100 of 204 (252661)
10-18-2005 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 91 by iano
10-17-2005 4:44 PM


There's only one Reality
iano writes:
So which is the warped reality: ours or the bibles. And how does one figure this?
Reality is reality. The sum of your sensory inputs is YOUR reality.
If YOUR reality matches that of the rest of the world then it becomes OUR reality
A book is not reality. It just projects an image.
If that image doesn't match OUR reality, then the book is warped.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by iano, posted 10-17-2005 4:44 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by iano, posted 10-18-2005 8:58 AM Legend has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1959 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 101 of 204 (252664)
10-18-2005 8:45 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by ringo
10-17-2005 4:54 PM


Re: Blessing, not Condemnation
Ringo writes:
That's exactly what I've been saying: for the purpose of this discussion, you and I are both assuming that the Bible has been handed down to us, word-for-word, as if dictated by God Herself.
Phew. You wouldn't believe how rarely I've heard those words spoken. You can be 20 messages in with discussion then someone says..well Pauls writings are corrupted etc.
Nonetheless, that epistle was addressed to the church of Rome and deliverd to the church of Rome. It is a mistake to extrapolate what Paul said to the Romans, as if it was universally applicable. If you think what he said was universally applicable to all Christians, show us where he said the same things (i.e. about condemnation) in his other epistles.
Why attempt to? If Romans is not to be extrapolated outside that bunch of Christians then why Galations or Thessalonians. Why extrapolate even the words Jesus spoke to the woman at the well to apply to any other than the woman at the well?
You ask later to show where the bible says follow all the law. But if the bible isn't seen relevant to you there is little point in quoting from it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by ringo, posted 10-17-2005 4:54 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by ringo, posted 10-18-2005 12:10 PM iano has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1959 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 102 of 204 (252669)
10-18-2005 8:58 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by Legend
10-18-2005 8:26 AM


Re: There's only one Reality
legend writes:
Reality is reality. The sum of your sensory inputs is YOUR reality. If YOUR reality matches that of the rest of the world then it becomes OUR reality
reality is not defined by saying "Reality is reality"
We are more than the sum of our sensory inputs. Remove them and I still have a reality
5 witnesses to an accident will give 5 different accounts. There is no such thing as OUR reality. Harmony, accordance, disharmony, discordance in varying measures. No OUR. No collective reality
6,000,000,000 people reading Jars 'map'. Each one as valid as the other cos there is nothing objective to compare any of them to.
1 book cannot match 6,000,000,000 realities...but one shouldn't point the finger at the book

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Legend, posted 10-18-2005 8:26 AM Legend has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by nwr, posted 10-18-2005 9:05 AM iano has replied
 Message 108 by Legend, posted 10-18-2005 1:23 PM iano has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 103 of 204 (252671)
10-18-2005 9:05 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by iano
10-18-2005 8:58 AM


Re: There's only one Reality
We are more than the sum of our sensory inputs. Remove them and I still have a reality
Remove all sensory input, and you will very likely die.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by iano, posted 10-18-2005 8:58 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by iano, posted 10-18-2005 9:25 AM nwr has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1959 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 104 of 204 (252682)
10-18-2005 9:25 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by nwr
10-18-2005 9:05 AM


Re: There's only one Reality
Sight, smell, taste, touch, hearing.
Losing all isn't fatal
This message has been edited by iano, 18-Oct-2005 02:25 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by nwr, posted 10-18-2005 9:05 AM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by nwr, posted 10-18-2005 9:56 AM iano has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 105 of 204 (252694)
10-18-2005 9:56 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by iano
10-18-2005 9:25 AM


Re: There's only one Reality
There is also a lot of sensory input from proprioception - internal signals about the state of the body.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by iano, posted 10-18-2005 9:25 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by iano, posted 10-18-2005 9:57 AM nwr has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024