where was the transition within fossil record?? [Stalled: randman]

Yawn, asked and answered. It's not my fault if you are incapable of grasping the reality of the process that new features would have to arise and exist within distinct populations and no analogy is going to change that fact.

You stated 8 species "between", but that is inaccurate. The reference between suggests some sort of chronology, does it not?The fact we see ancient whales does not alter the fact we don't see the transitions between ancient whales and their predecessors.

It's not my fault if you are incapable of grasping the reality of the process that new features would have to arise and exist within distinct populations and no analogy is going to change that fact.What part of the above statement do you not understand?

By the way, some of these just appear to be varities of dolphins or whales. For example, look at the pic of Prosqualodon in the following link.http://www.angellis.net/Web/DFG-mam/Prosqualodon.htmWhat's the big deal? Hardly some sort of evolutionary link.

Btw, just for a hoot, check out the evo propaganda on Pakicetus I just ran across. http://www.allaboutrainforests.com/...ion/Whalefossils.shtmlIn reality, Pakicetus did not have flippers and was a hooved land animal, but that never stopped evos. This probably was published when all they had was a skull, and the evo maxim seems to be, to me at least, to make a wild claim and assume it is true unless it can be disproven.If you guys took the time to really look at some of absurdities within your own camp, you would not be so hostile with the doubters.