Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 0/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Theism arrogant?
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5840 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 8 of 60 (255618)
10-30-2005 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by robinrohan
10-24-2005 6:05 PM


Everyone ought to believe in God.
Everyone ought to believe in TOE.
Both are arrogant.
However the statement "everyone should believe that the ToE is the best scientific explanation for the diversity of life we have at this time" is not arrogant. It is a definitional issue and appraisal of facts in relation to that definition. Whether one believes that the best science has to offer at this time is the actual explanation, is different than whether something is in fact the best science has to offer at this time.
Everyone feels the presence of God.
Everyone has secret fears.
Anyone who claims to feel the presence of God is deluded. What they feel, without knowing it, is the cultural pressure to be a believer.
The first is arrogant, unless it is changed to almost everyone feels something which many take (describe) to be the presence of God.
The second is almost arrogant. It depends on what one means by secret and fear. Unknown to onesself? Fear of something in particular?
The last is certainly arrogant. If a person said they believe that such people are deluded, or that they could be deluded is one thing. To make a statement as if that were knowledge is beyond their actual capability.
In levels of arrogance, telling a person what they ought to believe is only slightly more arrogant than telling them what they do believe.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by robinrohan, posted 10-24-2005 6:05 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by robinrohan, posted 10-30-2005 8:32 PM Silent H has replied

Silent H
Member (Idle past 5840 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 19 of 60 (255749)
10-31-2005 5:09 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by robinrohan
10-30-2005 8:32 PM


The very nature of a claim carries with it the idea that the claimer is right and anyone who disagrees with him is wrong. Arrogance only occurs with claims that include a personal element--e.g., "I, being an X, am better than you, being a Y."
It appears we have a slightly different definition of arrogance, or perhaps a different read on the situation.
To me arrogance is the assertion of one's position as being greater than it actually is. Thus to believe you think you know it is raining outside, when you've been indoors all day without any ability to see outside or get info from people outside, is arrogance.
Essentially it is the position "I, being me, am better at knowing than you, being someone other than me."
You can always believe you are right,and you are correct all claims carry that idea, but to the degree you advance to another that you must be right, or they cannot be, without any qualifiers is (to my definition) arrogance.
Thus telling a person what deity they ought to believe in means you are a better judge of reality than them. And telling a person what they do believe is such a pretense to omniscience that I am at a loss how that is not arrogance. That is about the height of hubris. No one can know truly what is in another person's head, or how they experience the world.
This message has been edited by holmes, 10-31-2005 05:10 AM

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by robinrohan, posted 10-30-2005 8:32 PM robinrohan has not replied

Silent H
Member (Idle past 5840 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 21 of 60 (255753)
10-31-2005 5:27 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by robinrohan
10-31-2005 5:12 AM


Re: Arrogance
To be arrogant, it has to be a claim about oneself, that oneself is superior. It's not about making claims about what somebody else thinks or feels.
Note that in my post #19, I lay out how that very thing is a hidden premise in the claims under discussion.
Just because a person doesn't explicitly say I am like a God, does not mean the argument made by that person does not actually include that as a logical requirement.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by robinrohan, posted 10-31-2005 5:12 AM robinrohan has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024