The very nature of a claim carries with it the idea that the claimer is right and anyone who disagrees with him is wrong. Arrogance only occurs with claims that include a personal element--e.g., "I, being an X, am better than you, being a Y."
It appears we have a slightly different definition of arrogance, or perhaps a different read on the situation.
To me arrogance is the assertion of one's position as being greater than it actually is. Thus to believe you think you know it is raining outside, when you've been indoors all day without any ability to see outside or get info from people outside, is arrogance.
Essentially it is the position "I, being me, am better at
knowing than you, being someone other than me."
You can always believe you are right,and you are correct all claims carry that idea, but to the degree you advance to another that you
must be right, or they
cannot be, without any qualifiers is (to my definition) arrogance.
Thus telling a person what deity they ought to believe in means you are a better judge of reality than them. And telling a person what they do believe is such a pretense to omniscience that I am at a loss how that is not arrogance. That is about the height of hubris. No one can know truly what is in another person's head, or how they experience the world.
This message has been edited by holmes, 10-31-2005 05:10 AM
holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)