|
Author
|
Topic: November, 2005, Posts of the Month
|
Minnemooseus
Member Posts: 3971 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: 11-11-2001 Member Rating: 7.1
|
|
Message 2 of 65 (256780)
11-04-2005 11:34 AM
|
|
|
Omnivorous, at "The Three Minute SOAPBOX:"
Name: Omnivorous Forum: Coffee House Thread: The Three Minute SOAPBOX: Post #: 3 The last paragraph:
Omnivorous writes: Why are so many environmentalists and lovers of all creatures secularists? Where are the voices of the faithful? Why is there no chorus rising from the churches to stop the destruction of this gorgeous world? This is in a "please, no reply to messages" themed topic, so don't debate the matter either there or in this POTM topic. But I would love to see that message in a "to be dabated" place. Moose
Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment. "Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 4 by Omnivorous, posted 11-04-2005 2:55 PM | | Minnemooseus has not replied |
|
Minnemooseus
Member Posts: 3971 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: 11-11-2001 Member Rating: 7.1
|
|
|
Message 7 of 65 (257105)
11-05-2005 4:11 PM
|
|
|
Yaro at "evolutionary chain" topic
Name: Yaro Forum: Biological Evolution Thread: evolutionary chain Post #: 41 Photographs of your ancestors - A brilliant analogy to the fossil record. Moose
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 8 by Yaro, posted 11-05-2005 4:37 PM | | Minnemooseus has not replied |
|
Minnemooseus
Member Posts: 3971 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: 11-11-2001 Member Rating: 7.1
|
|
|
Message 19 of 65 (258075)
11-09-2005 9:24 AM
|
|
|
Omnivorous, at "By their fruits shall ye know them."
Name: Omnivorous Forum: Social Issues and Creation/Evolution Thread: By their fruits shall ye know them. Post #: 15 At least the first couple of replies to this message could also get honorable mentions. Moose ps: Omnivourous started the topic, at my prompting. Honorable mention also to message 1.
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 20 by Omnivorous, posted 11-09-2005 10:21 AM | | Minnemooseus has not replied |
|
Minnemooseus
Member Posts: 3971 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: 11-11-2001 Member Rating: 7.1
|
Re: minnemooseus on public schools and religious subjects - Thanks, but...
Thanks for giving me my first POTM nomination, but I'm afraid that message 140 was a blotched effort (is this what they call "irony"?). See my message 159 at that topic, as well as Ben's preceeding message 158, and the Holmes message Ben there cites. Maybe you can edit that "140" into a "142"?  Moose Added by edit - Not really POTM material, but Holmes has done an important restating/clarification of his intents for and perspectives of the topic at message 168. Added by second edit: Please see next message. It seems to have turned out that my POTM nominated message may have been more on target than I realized. This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 11-17-2005 11:00 AM This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 11-17-2005 11:52 AM
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 32 by Chiroptera, posted 11-16-2005 7:59 PM | | Chiroptera has not replied |
|
Minnemooseus
Member Posts: 3971 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: 11-11-2001 Member Rating: 7.1
|
Holmes at "Randman's call for nonSecular education..."
Name: Holmes Forum: Coffee House Thread: Randman's call for nonSecular education... Post #: 168 OK - Despite what I just added by edit in my previous message, I'm going to give Holmes a POTM nomination. Not really POTM material (or is it?), but Holmes has done an important restating/clarification of his intents for and perspectives of the topic. Moose Added by edit: Ben thought I was misunderstanding Holmes' intent for the topic. But my understanding of the topic's intent was the same as Ben's. But Ben's understanding of the topic's intent was wrong, and therefore Ben's appraisal of my understanding of the topic's intent was right. D'oh This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 11-17-2005 11:42 AM
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 33 by Minnemooseus, posted 11-17-2005 12:17 AM | | Minnemooseus has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 35 by Silent H, posted 11-18-2005 10:18 AM | | Minnemooseus has not replied |
|
Minnemooseus
Member Posts: 3971 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: 11-11-2001 Member Rating: 7.1
|
|
|
Message 42 of 65 (261932)
11-21-2005 11:36 AM
|
|
|
Berberry - Debates seldom happen here ( "YEC approaches to empirical investigation")
Name: berberry Forum: Is It Science? Thread: YEC approaches to empirical investigation Post #: 260 The above cited is a response to a message containing:
Faith writes: I don't need to support what God said. What God said trumps all challenges of any sort. People - Remember, this forum is not a place to debate the cited material. Moose Edited to replace "No further comment" with the Faith quotation. This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 11-21-2005 12:04 PM
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 43 by berberry, posted 11-21-2005 1:01 PM | | Minnemooseus has not replied |
|
Minnemooseus
Member Posts: 3971 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: 11-11-2001 Member Rating: 7.1
|
|
|
Message 54 of 65 (263337)
11-26-2005 1:55 PM
|
|
|
Mike the Wiz, at the "The Clergy Project" topic
Name: Mike the Wiz Forum: In The News Thread: The Clergy Project Post #: 30 Includes:
I'm happy to say at least, that a literal interpretation of scripture that specifically excludes evolutionary science, is infact something which cannot be supported by any reasonable person, IMHO. Such an exclusive ideology on what God says, is heavily biased, and infact no man can claim to understand scripture this thoroughly, IMHO. God would be asking us to observe something in nature, which appears to happen, according to the evidence, as false. He would be asking me to dismiss the causality of honest atheists/theists etc, which led them to such brilliantly clever findings. I support the previous nomination of a Faith message. The (IMO misplaced/off-topic) Mike the Wiz message functions as commentary on Faith's position, and I suggested to Mike that it would be better in Faith's topic. Perhaps Mike should offer up a variation of his message, as a new "Proposed New Topic". Regardless, the cited content should not be debated in the POTM forum. Moose
|
™ Version 4.2