He points out that American computer science expert Simon Berkovich and Dutch brain researcher Herms Romijn, working independently of one another, came to the same conclusion: that it is impossible for the brain to store everything you think and experience in your life.
But nobody's brain
does store everything they think and experience. I mean, how much stuff have
you forgotten? How much do you simply not pay any attention to in the first place? How often are you thinking about the way your clothes feel? Or how much your hair weighs?
Haven't you ever gotten in the car to drive a significant distance, and when you get there, you remember absolutely nothing about the trip? Nobody remembers a continuous video of their lives, so these calculations are meaningless.
This would require a processing speed of 1024 bits per second.
Is that 1024 bits, or 10^24 bits? The first doesn't really seem like a stretch for the brain.
Anyway, the idea that the brain "isn't enough" is just nonsense. If the brain doesn't do the thinking and remembering, then why do we have brains? And why does damage to the brain change, literally, the way you think? How does psychopharmacology work if the brain isn't actually where the thinking and remembering happens?
These cases include NDE vision in persons blind from birth.
Which is a very good proof that these "visions" are simply artifacts produced by the brain.
Nevertheless, she correctly described instruments used by the doctors and conversations held between the doctors and nurses conducting the operation.
And she's never watched
ER? Or the Discovery Channel?
I could probably describe the conversations held between the doctors and nurses at that time, with probably the same degree of accuracy.