Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Cyanobacteria weren't first, but last?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Cyanobacteria weren't first, but last?
Sepiraph
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 6 of 7 (26455)
12-12-2002 9:07 PM 		Reply to: Message 5 by blitz77
11-07-2002 1:48 AM

quote:
Originally posted by blitz77:
Of course, according to the article cyanobacteria aren't the first bacteria. But my point still stands-or are you suggesting these sulfur-loving bacteria produced the first oxygen in the reducing atmosphere?
​
[This message has been edited by blitz77, 11-07-2002]
​
Well, whether true or not, that's what they're teaching in undergraduate microbiology courses these days.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by blitz77, posted 11-07-2002 1:48 AM blitz77 has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Quetzal, posted 12-13-2002 1:39 AM Sepiraph has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024