Sexual expression: your opinion

Sexual expression involving consenting people is nobody's business, except for the people involved. The government should keep out of it, the newspapers should keep out of it, the politicians (as in Monica-gate) should keep out of it.Hmm, the churches should also keep out of it.Not long ago, someone posted a message in which he expressed guilt at his sin of masturbation. Christians should stop this nonsense. For someone with no other outlet, masturbation should be seen as good. It exercises the organs. Your urologist will probably advise it to better maintain prostate health.

I am skeptical as to whether there was consent in all of those cases.

It is outside my experience. Maybe my skepticism is ignorant. Still, for the present I am skeptical.

Then you need some anger control. Be careful of hearsay reports.In most cases, porn does not lead to rape.There isn't much point in being angry over porn, because there isn't much you can do about it anyway. Your anger is wasted. Start by controlling your anger. I doubt that.In any case, the time you spend reading and posting at evcforum is time that you are not spending on porn.Keep up a varied and interesting life, and you will be fine. People with interesting activities soon find porn to be boring. People who become addicted are mostly people who would otherwise be bored.And don't forget to work on that anger.

You still need some anger management.

Because you shouldn't be angry.Sure, anyone can be briefly angry as a response to some provocation. But that should quickly dissipate. You shouldn't be angry enough to be mentioning that in your posts.To much anger is not good for you.

quote:

---

Of course children are born because of lust.

​

So you are not planning on having children?

---

Come now, holmes. That was unfair.You ought to have taken Guidosoft to be saying "some children are born because of lust." After all, you were leading him on with your comment about children born as a result of rape.

It's hard to say what he meant. He has immature ideas as to what is lust, what is love, what is sex. I would not agree with that. Perhaps Guidosoft would. It seems to me that you have a dubious meaning for "lust". According to Wikipedia it is "inappropriate sexual desire."

I don't have any problem with those definitions. It still seems to me that you are using "lust" too broadly.