Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution for Dummies and Christians
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 189 of 299 (266403)
12-07-2005 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by Carico
12-07-2005 1:14 PM


Re: Please be consistent
Hey Carico... do you belive the earth revolves around the sun or the sun around the earth?
Last time I checkd God's law was wrong on that one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 1:14 PM Carico has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 1:32 PM Yaro has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 191 of 299 (266409)
12-07-2005 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by Carico
12-07-2005 1:23 PM


Carico. You have been repeating this same point in several threads. Have you bothered to read anyones refutations?
You are compleatly, utterly, wrong. You don't understand evolution or how it works. Would you like to understand it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 1:23 PM Carico has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 1:32 PM Yaro has replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 194 of 299 (266417)
12-07-2005 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 193 by Carico
12-07-2005 1:32 PM


So how can animals and humans exchange genes if we cannot breed with each other?
Animals and humans DON'T exchange genes. This is not what the Theory of Evolution (ToE) says. ToE describes the process by which a given population of organisms change, geneticaly, over time.
This "genetic drift" is caused by random mutation of the genome during reproduction. Think of your siblings, you don't look exactly like them do you? Now think about your grandparents, you probably look even more unlike them as well. This is due to small changes in the DNA which causes various similarities and differences to express themselves.
ToE is much more complicated than this but your imediate family is a good example for explanatory purposes. Now imagine, if you will, those changes going back several hundred generations. I bet your ancestors 1000 years ago look way WAY different than you do today.
Now imagine your ancestors 6 million years ago. Well, those ancestors didn't even look like modern humans
ToE is basically little changes over vast amounts of time that compound uppon themselves to make big changes in the future.
Do you have that so far? Let me know. And I will explain further as to why we say men are descended from a common ancestor with apes.
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-07-2005 01:46 PM
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-07-2005 01:50 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 1:32 PM Carico has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 1:55 PM Yaro has replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 197 of 299 (266431)
12-07-2005 2:05 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by Carico
12-07-2005 1:55 PM


I've heard all of what you said for 30 years before I became a Christian. But again, it overlooks the original premise of how offspring are produced. We cannot even begin to get into populations without addressing the feasibility of how even one creature in that population was created. So that is what needs to be examined before the rest of the theory can even be looked at.
Sir, with all due respect, you don't understand the theory. I am explaining it to you. It has nothing to do with, origins, or first offspring, or anything you just mentioned.
Before the rest of the theory is "looked at" you first need to have a basic grasp of the theory. You don't have to agree with it, but you should first understand it.
So again, how did 2 primates breed an offspring so different than themselves to be given the name of a new species; namely,a "Homonid" ?
First, you are expecting two ancient primates to one day, have sex, and out pops a human. That's absurd and that isn't what happens. Remember what I said before? ToE is "genetic drift" (change) in a POPULATION over time.
Several million years ago a population of ancient primates were isolated from the rest. Over time, these creatures began to change thrugh random mutation acted upon by natural selection. At some point in this process our common ancestor with apes arose.
A common ancestor means we are both related to this creature. Modern apes would be your like your cusins. Our common ancestor would be like your grandparents.
Do you understand this so far?
This has never happened since the beginning of recorded history because again, there is a natural sperme barrier between humans and animals that makes interbreeding impossible.
Carico, by this point you should understand that the ToE does not require crossbreeding humans and animals. Do you understand this?
ABE: If you are not following any of the points so far. Please ask me to elaborate on what is confusing you.
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-07-2005 02:14 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 1:55 PM Carico has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 2:20 PM Yaro has replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 199 of 299 (266442)
12-07-2005 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 198 by Carico
12-07-2005 2:20 PM


No. I am not proposing at all that 2 beasts got together and instantly produced a human. I am simply saying that offspring come from the mating of their parents, which evolutionists seem to overlook entirely.
No we don't. The changes we are talking about are small and would not prevent the creature from mating within it's population. Remember the ENTRE POPULATION is changing, not just the individual.
A good example would be dogs. Now, all dog breeds are in the same species, and they all came from wolves. Yet, all dog breeds can't mate with each other.
Look at the chihuahua and the Great Dane. Now, both the Great Dane and Chihuahu are dogs, but for obvious physical characteristics (and iirc also genetic variation) they cannot interbreed! Does this change the fact that both came from wolves?
Of course not. Chihuahuas, as a population, became succesively smaller over time while great danes became larger. It's the same way with humans and apes except projected over several million years.
That does not put humans and animals in the same species like evolutionists would like us to believe.
Well, first of all, animal is not a species. Animal is a kingdom. Species is a much smaller taxa. And species H. Sapiens, contains only us. So you shouldn't have a problem with this.
Therefore, since species cannot cross-breed, then how in the heck can we be the descendants of apes? it's impossible except in the imagination.
Look at the example I just gave with the chihuahua. Then revisit this point.
So are you saying we can change into birds through random mutation? If so, then where's your proof? If not, then how can you say that apes can turn into humans?
Random mutation acted upon by Natural Selection. The Natural Selection is the important bit. But let's not go here yet.
Before we discuss Natural Selection you first need to grasp how eveolutionary change works. Again, revist the point about the chihuahua and the great dane. Once you understand that concept we will proceed.
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-07-2005 02:44 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 2:20 PM Carico has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 2:48 PM Yaro has replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 202 of 299 (266462)
12-07-2005 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 201 by Carico
12-07-2005 2:48 PM


And how do you know that the Chihuahua came from a wolf? Who said? Last I heard, Chrihuahuas came from chihuahuas. And why are wolves not breeding chihuahuas today?
Carico, do you know what dog breeding is? It is a well documented, known, fact that all modern dog breeds descend directly from wolves because HUMANS CREATED DOG BREEDS.
It is a known fact! Some dog breeds have been created as recently as a few hundred years ago. It's done thrugh selective breeding.
We can get big dogs from little dogs and vice versa. It's not magic, dog breeders do it all the time. Didn't you know this?
You guys believe anything you read, particularly if the person has a Ph.d after his name!
This is known as an adhominem attack. So far I have not called you names or accused you of anything. I expect the same courtesy from you.
Now, I am not going to proceed unless you understand the point about dog breeding. Do you now accept that chihuahuas and great danes are related even though they cannot interbreed?
After all, WE CREATED chihuahuas and great danes.
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-07-2005 02:57 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 2:48 PM Carico has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 203 by Yaro, posted 12-07-2005 3:05 PM Yaro has not replied
 Message 214 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 11:28 PM Yaro has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 203 of 299 (266465)
12-07-2005 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 202 by Yaro
12-07-2005 2:56 PM


Dogs, dogs, and more dogs
Here is an example of the breeding we have done with dogs
Pomeranian dog - Wikipedia
quote:
The Pomeranian originated from the sled dogs of Iceland and Lapland, which were eventually brought into Europe. The Germans improved the coat and bred the dogs down for city living, but they were still 20 pounds or more when they reached England.
English breeders, through trial and error and Mendelian theories, are credited for reducing the dog's size and developing the many colors. The Pomeranian of today is small due to selective breeding, but the breed still retains the hardy disposition and thick coat typical of dogs in cold climates.
The Pomeranian became internationally popular when Queen Victoria returned from vacation in Florence, Italy with a Pomeranian named Marco.
The closest relatives of the Pomeranian are the Norwegian Elkhound, the Samoyed, the Schipperke, and the whole Spitz group.
Here is the sort of sled dog (from which pomeraninans descend):
Sled dog - Wikipedia
And we KNOW this, because WE, HUMANS, did it.
EDIT: Changed the image to a Norweigan Elkhound. A closer relative than the Greenland Dog.
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-07-2005 03:07 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by Yaro, posted 12-07-2005 2:56 PM Yaro has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 3:17 PM Yaro has replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 206 of 299 (266474)
12-07-2005 3:21 PM
Reply to: Message 204 by Carico
12-07-2005 3:17 PM


Re: Dogs, dogs, and more dogs
But you forget that apes and humans cannot interbreed so your point is moot. We're talking about human origins. And since apes and humans cannot interbreed then apes and humans cannot be intermingled. To say that they can is insinuating bestiality.
You obviously don't understand the point. Chihuahuas and Great Danes can't interbreed and we KNOW they are related.
I am mentioning this is an example of how a POPULATION of animals can change over time to the point where they can no longer interbreed with the parent population.
We wouldn't expect modern apes and humans to be able to interbreed. Although, not to cloud the issue, it's pretty likely humans and chimps can interbreed. We are close enugh geneticaly. Though the ethical questions involved prevent such an experiment.
Anyway, do you understand now? Do you see how populations can change over time to the point where they can no longer interbreed with the parent population?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 3:17 PM Carico has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 209 by Minnemooseus, posted 12-07-2005 5:23 PM Yaro has replied
 Message 213 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 11:21 PM Yaro has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 208 of 299 (266510)
12-07-2005 5:01 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by Carico
12-07-2005 4:48 PM


*bump*
Carico, given all that has been explained, do you now see how a population of animals can change over time to the point where they can no longer interbreed? (e.g. Great Danes and Chihuahuas)
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-07-2005 05:07 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by Carico, posted 12-07-2005 4:48 PM Carico has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 210 of 299 (266524)
12-07-2005 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 209 by Minnemooseus
12-07-2005 5:23 PM


Re: Dogs, dogs, and more dogs
Hey moose, Im aware of the gray areas. And the fact that perhaps, (artifical ensimination) may produce offspring. The greater point however is that the physical difficulties involved with a chihuahua and Great Dane copulating in effect makes them unable to breed (under natural conditions).
I am trying to give this topic a narrow focus in order as not to confuse Curico. I want him to understand the larger concepts first. Then we can get specific.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by Minnemooseus, posted 12-07-2005 5:23 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 241 of 299 (266744)
12-08-2005 8:41 AM
Reply to: Message 237 by Carico
12-08-2005 8:03 AM


No Arguments Please!
Hey Carico,
Just got on, seem's like you are getting swamped!
May I suggest to you, and to everyone, not to get into an argument. It will soon become a shouting match. I think we would all do best to simply explain to Carico how ToE works. Carico, I only ask that you listen, and follow along.
Anyway, before I brought up the dog example. I showed you how we have bread dogs to be unable to breed (chihuahua Great Dane). I know we had a hand in it, but at least you can see that it is possible for genetic variation to lead to a group of creatures being unable to breed with a previous group of creatures. Do you agree with this Carico?
If you do, we can move on. All you need to do is answer Yes/No.
If you would like, me and you could have a Great Debate topic where only you and I will discuss. That way you won't be swamped by all the other board members. Do you think this would be helpfull?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 237 by Carico, posted 12-08-2005 8:03 AM Carico has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 243 by Carico, posted 12-08-2005 8:54 AM Yaro has replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 242 of 299 (266745)
12-08-2005 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 240 by Carico
12-08-2005 8:37 AM


Re: The "premise of evolution"?
Carico, again, no one is saying humans came from an ape.
It's a common ancestor. Did you come from your cusin? No. But you are related by virtue of your grandparents.
Millions of years agao there was an ape-like creature that lead both to humans and modern apes. No ape/human crossbreed necissary.
Oh, and please reply to this mesage Message 241
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-08-2005 08:44 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by Carico, posted 12-08-2005 8:37 AM Carico has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 265 by NosyNed, posted 12-08-2005 10:58 AM Yaro has replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 244 of 299 (266749)
12-08-2005 8:59 AM
Reply to: Message 243 by Carico
12-08-2005 8:54 AM


Re: No Arguments Please!
I will listen. But if I see contradictions, am I free to point them out?
Of course. But please, don't simply shout "AHA! SEE YOUR WRONG!" That get's us nowhere. If you see something you feel is in conflict, or that you don't understand, point it out. I would be happy to address the issue.
I have heard the same statements about evolution for over 30 years, so I don't think there's anything new you can tell me.
Well, from what I have read from you so far, whatever you have heard for the last 30 years is compleatly worng. I'm sorry to say, but you are very misinformed.
Look, you don't have to accept the theory. You can think it's total hogwash for all I care. But, it's important for you to understand how the theory works. I would like to explain it to you if you will listen.
And then when i point out contradictions, they either change their premis or yell at me because of their contradictions. So what do you suggest I do?
Well.... would you like to have a great Debate Topic Just you and me?
I know I'm going to hear things I've heard many times before. But i'm wondering if it's possible for evolutionists themsleves to see their own contradictions. Is it?
Sure. I'm open to the possibility that I may be wrong. But you must first learn the subject you wish to debate. Namely the ToE.
Would you like to start a great debate topic?
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-08-2005 09:02 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by Carico, posted 12-08-2005 8:54 AM Carico has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 249 of 299 (266757)
12-08-2005 9:19 AM
Reply to: Message 246 by Carico
12-08-2005 9:07 AM


So is this common ancestor half-man, half-beast? If not, then how can it be common to both humans and apes? If so, then how did it develop the traits of another species without mating with it? Are you saying that animals spontaneously turn into other species without mating?
Well first off, before I address this, you need to understand two concepts.
First, given the dog example (chihuahua and great dane) do you now see how one population of creatures can change to the point where they can no longer breed with a previous population?
Second, do you agree that random mutations in genes occur, and that this is the reason for genetic variation "drift"?
This message has been edited by Yaro, 12-08-2005 09:27 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 246 by Carico, posted 12-08-2005 9:07 AM Carico has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 252 by Carico, posted 12-08-2005 9:38 AM Yaro has replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6517 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 253 of 299 (266764)
12-08-2005 9:44 AM
Reply to: Message 252 by Carico
12-08-2005 9:38 AM


Random mutation is exactly that. Random. It does not keep adding new genes to a cell in the same offspring over and over and over again in the same species. It is random and happens by chance. That also means that the likelihood of this mutant's offspring also having a random mutation is almost nil, ESPECIALLY adding another superior gene like the ability to talk. But that's what evolutionists propose for us to believe, which is a contradiction. The number of mutations that would have to have occured for MILLIONS of years for an ape to turn into a man is more impossible than anything in the bible!!
Ok.. so you agree that it happens right? Random mutations and genetic variation. That's why we get tall people, short people, dark people, light-skinned people, blond hair, black hair, etc. Just random variations in the genome that crop up over time. We agree?
No. You still haven't proven how a great Dane and a Chihuaua were ever able to breed. I know it's possible for a human to manipulate genes, but not for animals themselves to do it. So without human manipulation, how can a Great Dane and a chihuahua produce offspring together? And where is the proof that they ever could?
Humans didn't manipulate the genes. It's a process known as selective beeding. And it's essentially what goes on in nature all the time. Except in nature humans aren't doing the selecting, the environment is.
In any case, you can see that a chihuahua and great dane cannot naturaly mate? Even if size is the only reason. You agree with me there correct? That chihuhua is a dog bread to the point where it can no longer mate with other, larger, groups of dogs?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by Carico, posted 12-08-2005 9:38 AM Carico has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 254 by Carico, posted 12-08-2005 9:49 AM Yaro has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024