Off Topic. Please do not reply to this post

I always like these evolution v. Creationism debates. First of all do scientists claim to have all the answers: "No!" Second, was evolution even considered prior to Darwin coming along? "No!" Third, have the evolutionists come up with an experiment that show that live spontanteously was creeted in water then through successive "evolutions" left the water and entered the trees as monkeys then climbed out as men?" No!" So what do the "objective" scientists say. . . . evolution is the only valid theory of how man was created. .. . hahahahahhaThis message has been edited by Shamgar, 12-10-2005 12:11 PMThis message has been edited by AdminJar, 12-10-2005 12:47 PM[AdminBen] Edited to fix html tag problem.This message has been edited by AdminBen, Saturday, 2005/12/10 11:07 AM

Well the theory of evolution has "evolved". . . first they were trying to get everyone to belief the ape theory. .. but since they were unable to get all the skulls they needed (too many people refused to buy the story) they needed to "evolve" the theory in other areas to "prove" evolution. .. the biggest "evolution" was to start saying "evolution" for everything in biology. This or that creature or plant "evolved" over time. .(after all the more you say a word the more people begin to "evolve" and use the word) . . . .. yet the original "evolution" of the theory of evolution had yet to be proven. . . .they still have yet to prove the original premise.. . . .that man came out of the trees from an ape. . . in spite of all their failures to prove their premise. . . .they still want to harp that they have "trends" that show evolution, evedince that "shows" evolution. . . the reality is the scientists can continue to twist and distort the evidence all they want ( as they have repeatedly done) but without ALL THE PIECES they cannot prove that "evolution" is the way man came into being. .. . and science does not admit to having all the pieces. . .and that is a fact. ..

Really Yaro? So you have scientific evidence which disprove all the claims of the Scriptures. . .I would be happy to see that study. ..Sounds like more claims without basis in fact on your side. . . you should "evolve" a new response. . .Romans 1: 19 because the thing which may be known of God is clearly revealed within them, for God revealed it to them. 20 For the unseen things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being realized by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, for them to be without excuse. 21 Because, knowing God, they did not glorify Him as God, neither were thankful. But they became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man, and birds, and four-footed animals, and creeping things. 24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves. 25 For they changed the truth of God into a lie, and they worshiped and served the created thing more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

Sure nrw, the "theory" has "evolved" since science is built on mistakes.
In fact to create a new drug it take 10 to 15 years of mistakes before the new drug is "safe". . .that is unless the data is "cooked" and them maybe after enough people drop dead the drug is taken off the market. . . so to say a theory "evolves" is bogus since obvioulsy the original hypothesis (a fancy word for GUESS) was was off so it had to be "tweaked" repeatedly by new guess to make the process seem "scientific".
Many "discoveries" of science were blunders. .. plastic was an example of a failed experiment. . . . so "Yes" evolution of theories is mandatory.

AdminNosy, well you see I have a Bachelors degree in biology and a minor in Chemistry so obviously I do know what I am taking about. . .so I don't need to sit back and "hold my tongue" on biology topics. ..thank you very much. .. .This message has been edited by Shamgar, 12-10-2005 02:48 PM

AdminNosy, hahahahaha I can talk theory in chemistry, biology, speech, medicine/health, and the Scriptures. . . oh it appears I am "introducing more scripture than biology" since it trumps what you have said. . .go figure. . .