Theory Evolution (not "Theory of Evolution")

If lasers lights can be made to go faster than light, then perhaps the entire universe has different light speeds. Scientists are able to slow the speed of light and speed it up in the natural (smoke and mirrors). The evidence of science evolving is that light can be made to go faster in the natural. Is gravity but evidence too that there is light waves undetectable supporting string theory.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/841690.stmThe bible within the book of Job says that God is able to bind or loosen these bands. That he alone is responsible for the expansion of the heavens. That he treadeth the waters, that the Lord was able to walk on the waters. This too me is all about string theory the visible being created from the invisible.Perhaps in time scientists will find scientific evidence that the galaxies are spreading away from each other. If there is any visible evidence that lights speed is violated between the galaxies, then the sciences would be evolving.It would be supernatural evidence in the natural confirming the theological evidences that God alone is spreading out the heavens.Is there any visible evidence supporting lights speed is violated in the heavens. The bible suggests that the heavens are expanding, and that God alone is responsible.ID is simply Science evolving its theory and TOE devolving based on the scientific evidences. ID is the Evolution Theory evolving in agreement with Theological evidences. Evolution Theory has simply evolved into ID based on the scientific evidences.TOE is still a theory but appears based on the scientific evidence its devolving(becoming unravelled by the Scientific evidence).This thread appears to be all about Theory Evolution not being the TOE. An example being how ID evolved from the TOE.This message has been edited by The Golfer, 12-12-2005 09:19 PM

Message 1 of 40
12-07-2005 02:33 PM--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message first appeared here, where the message subtitle was "Typical yes/no black/white fundamentalist-creationist reasoning".
How is it a great thing about science that they prove themselves wrong in every generation?It is not that scientific theories are discarded wholesale. They are modified to be improved versions. Much/most of the previous content remains being considered valid.It is not that scientists show ("prove") themselves to be completely wrong. It's that scientists show themselves to be less than completely right. There is alway room for improvement in a theory.Many mainstream Christians also have found that there is room for improvement in their theology. It is the fundamentialists that are stuck in the "it's all right or it's all wrong" line of reasoning.-------------------------------------------------------------------Whats off topic by suggesting ID evolved from the TOE. And for suggesting that ID is an improvement of the TOE based on evolution theory. ID is not addressing theology but the sciences. Meaning not stuck in the fundamentialists all right or its all wrong line of reasoning Minnemooseus credited to the fundamentalists.TE is about is about Minnemooseus belief that scientists are not completely right (not a black and white thing) and that science is evolving. (Theory Evolution not Theory of Evolution) Science is evolving.An example of science evolving is the theory of relativity, now that light speed has been broken. Its not about its all right or wrong, because ID too is evolving based on the scientific evidence.I hear you though. That the theolgical evidence supporting the scientific evidences is not the premise of this thread. Its more about the sciences evolving not on a black and white premise of fundementalists theologies but based on the scientific evidences.This message has been edited by The Golfer, 12-12-2005 09:15 PM